5b54286640
Remove the "which is required by `{root_obligation}`" post-script in
"the trait `X` is not implemented for `Y`" explanation in E0277. This
information is already conveyed in the notes explaining requirements,
making it redundant while making the text (particularly in labels)
harder to read.
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `NotCopy: Copy` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/wf-static-type.rs:10:13
|
LL | static FOO: IsCopy<Option<NotCopy>> = IsCopy { t: None };
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `Copy` is not implemented for `NotCopy`
|
= note: required for `Option<NotCopy>` to implement `Copy`
note: required by a bound in `IsCopy`
--> $DIR/wf-static-type.rs:7:17
|
LL | struct IsCopy<T:Copy> { t: T }
| ^^^^ required by this bound in `IsCopy`
```
vs the prior
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `NotCopy: Copy` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/wf-static-type.rs:10:13
|
LL | static FOO: IsCopy<Option<NotCopy>> = IsCopy { t: None };
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `Copy` is not implemented for `NotCopy`, which is required by `Option<NotCopy>: Copy`
|
= note: required for `Option<NotCopy>` to implement `Copy`
note: required by a bound in `IsCopy`
--> $DIR/wf-static-type.rs:7:17
|
LL | struct IsCopy<T:Copy> { t: T }
| ^^^^ required by this bound in `IsCopy`
```
17 lines
507 B
Plaintext
17 lines
507 B
Plaintext
error[E0277]: `()` is not a future
|
|
--> $DIR/issue-101715.rs:11:10
|
|
|
|
|
LL | .await
|
|
| -^^^^^
|
|
| ||
|
|
| |`()` is not a future
|
|
| help: remove the `.await`
|
|
|
|
|
= help: the trait `Future` is not implemented for `()`
|
|
= note: () must be a future or must implement `IntoFuture` to be awaited
|
|
= note: required for `()` to implement `IntoFuture`
|
|
|
|
error: aborting due to 1 previous error
|
|
|
|
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0277`.
|