Files
rust/tests/codegen
Jubilee 33eb552ceb Rollup merge of #143410 - scottmcm:redo-transmute-again, r=RalfJung,workingjubilee
Block SIMD in transmute_immediate; delete `OperandValueKind`

Vectors have been causing me problems for years in this code, for example https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/110021#discussion_r1160975086 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/143194

See conversation in <https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/131828-t-compiler/topic/Is.20transmuting.20a.20.60T.60.20to.20.60Tx1.60.20.28one-element.20SIMD.20vector.29.20UB.3F/near/526262799>.

By blocking SIMD in `transmute_immediate` it can be simplified to just take the `Scalar`s involved -- the backend types can be gotten from those `Scalar`s, rather than needing to be passed.  And there's an assert added to ICE it if it does get hit.

Accordingly, this changes `rvalue_creates_operand` to not send SIMD transmutes through the operand path, but to always go through memory instead, like they did back before rust-lang/rust#108442.

And thanks to those changes, I could also remove the `OperandValueKind` type that I added back then which `@RalfJung` rightly considers pretty sketchy.

cc `@folkertdev` `@workingjubilee` from the zulip conversation too
2025-07-04 23:26:24 -07:00
..
2025-05-21 07:24:43 +00:00
2024-05-31 15:56:43 +10:00
2025-04-06 21:41:47 +02:00
2025-04-20 11:18:38 +02:00
2024-05-31 15:56:43 +10:00
2025-07-04 12:29:27 -07:00
2025-02-24 09:26:54 +00:00
2025-02-24 09:26:54 +00:00
2025-06-18 12:37:08 +02:00
2025-02-24 09:26:54 +00:00
2025-02-24 09:26:54 +00:00
2025-02-24 09:26:54 +00:00
2025-02-24 09:26:54 +00:00
2025-02-24 09:26:54 +00:00
2024-05-31 15:56:43 +10:00
2024-05-31 15:56:43 +10:00
2024-04-11 21:42:35 -04:00
2025-04-16 17:13:50 -04:00
2024-05-31 15:56:43 +10:00
2025-02-24 09:26:54 +00:00
2024-05-31 15:56:43 +10:00
2024-04-24 13:12:33 +01:00
2025-02-03 10:39:32 -05:00
2024-05-31 15:56:43 +10:00
2025-02-24 09:26:54 +00:00
2024-05-31 15:56:43 +10:00
2025-02-24 09:26:54 +00:00
2025-07-01 19:00:21 +00:00
2025-02-24 09:26:54 +00:00
2024-07-14 13:48:29 +03:00
2025-02-24 09:26:54 +00:00
2024-07-14 13:48:29 +03:00
2025-02-24 09:26:54 +00:00
2024-05-31 15:56:43 +10:00
2024-07-14 13:48:29 +03:00
2024-05-31 15:56:43 +10:00
2025-02-24 09:26:54 +00:00
2025-03-02 18:53:49 +00:00
2025-02-24 09:26:54 +00:00
2024-08-07 00:41:48 -04:00
2024-05-31 15:56:43 +10:00
2024-09-09 19:39:43 -07:00

The files here use the LLVM FileCheck framework, documented at https://llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/FileCheck.html.

One extension worth noting is the use of revisions as custom prefixes for FileCheck. If your codegen test has different behavior based on the chosen target or different compiler flags that you want to exercise, you can use a revisions annotation, like so:

// revisions: aaa bbb
// [bbb] compile-flags: --flags-for-bbb

After specifying those variations, you can write different expected, or explicitly unexpected output by using <prefix>-SAME: and <prefix>-NOT:, like so:

// CHECK: expected code
// aaa-SAME: emitted-only-for-aaa
// aaa-NOT:                        emitted-only-for-bbb
// bbb-NOT:  emitted-only-for-aaa
// bbb-SAME:                       emitted-only-for-bbb