Add FileCheck annotations to MIR-opt inlining tests
Part of #116971, adds FileCheck annotations to MIR-opt tests in `tests/mir-opt/inline`.
I left out a few (such as `inline_cycle`) where it mentioned that the particular outcome of inlining isn't important, just that the inliner doesn't get stuck in an infinite loop.
r? cjgillot
Account for `ref` and `mut` in the wrong place for pattern ident renaming
If the user writes `S { ref field: name }` instead of `S { field: ref name }`, we suggest the correct code.
Fix#72298.
Support enum variants in offset_of!
This MR implements support for navigating through enum variants in `offset_of!`, placing the enum variant name in the second argument to `offset_of!`. The RFC placed it in the first argument, but I think it interacts better with nested field access in the second, as you can then write things like
```rust
offset_of!(Type, field.Variant.field)
```
Alternatively, a syntactic distinction could be made between variants and fields (e.g. `field::Variant.field`) but I'm not convinced this would be helpful.
[RFC 3308 # Enum Support](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3308-offset_of.html#enum-support-offset_ofsomeenumstructvariant-field_on_variant)
Tracking Issue #106655.
Clean up unchecked_math, separate out unchecked_shifts
Tracking issue: #85122
Changes:
1. Remove `const_inherent_unchecked_arith` flag and make const-stability flags the same as the method feature flags. Given the number of other unsafe const fns already stabilised, it makes sense to just stabilise these in const context when they're stabilised.
2. Move `unchecked_shl` and `unchecked_shr` into a separate `unchecked_shifts` flag, since the semantics for them are unclear and they'll likely be stabilised separately as a result.
3. Add an `unchecked_neg` method exclusively to signed integers, under the `unchecked_neg` flag. This is because it's a new API and probably needs some time to marinate before it's stabilised, and while it *would* make sense to have a similar version for unsigned integers since `checked_neg` also exists for those there is absolutely no case where that would be a good idea, IMQHO.
The longer-term goal here is to prepare the `unchecked_math` methods for an FCP and stabilisation since they've existed for a while, their semantics are clear, and people seem in favour of stabilising them.
Match usize/isize exhaustively with half-open ranges
The long-awaited finale to the saga of [exhaustiveness checking for integers](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/50912)!
```rust
match 0usize {
0.. => {} // exhaustive!
}
match 0usize {
0..usize::MAX => {} // helpful error message!
}
```
Features:
- Half-open ranges behave as expected for `usize`/`isize`;
- Trying to use `0..usize::MAX` will tell you that `usize::MAX..` is missing and explain why. No more unhelpful "`_` is missing";
- Everything else stays the same.
This should unblock https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/37854.
Review-wise:
- I recommend looking commit-by-commit;
- This regresses perf because of the added complexity in `IntRange`; hopefully not too much;
- I measured each `#[inline]`, they all help a bit with the perf regression (tho I don't get why);
- I did not touch MIR building; I expect there's an easy PR there that would skip unnecessary comparisons when the range is half-open.
Replace switch to unreachable by assume statements
`UnreachablePropagation` currently keeps some switch terminators alive in order to ensure codegen can infer the inequalities on the discriminants.
This PR proposes to encode those inequalities as `Assume` statements.
This allows to simplify MIR further by removing some useless terminators.
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #113241 (rustdoc: Document lack of object safety on affected traits)
- #117388 (Turn const_caller_location from a query to a hook)
- #117417 (Add a stable MIR visitor)
- #117439 (prepopulate opaque ty storage before using it)
- #117451 (Add support for pre-unix-epoch file dates on Apple platforms (#108277))
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rustdoc: Document lack of object safety on affected traits
Closes#85138
I saw the issue didn't have any recent activity, if there is another MR for it I missed it.
I want the issue to move forward so here is my proposition.
It takes some space just before the "Implementors" section and only if the trait is **not** object
safe since it is the only case where special care must be taken in some cases and this has the
benefit of avoiding generation of HTML in (I hope) the common case.
Accept less invalid Rust in rustdoc
pulled out of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117213 where this change was already approved
This only affects rustdoc, and has up to [20% perf regressions in rustdoc](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117213#issuecomment-1785776288). These are unavoidable, as we are simply doing more checks now, but it's part of the longer term plan of making rustdoc more resistant to ICEs by only accepting valid Rust code.
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #116267 (Some codegen cleanups around SIMD checks)
- #116712 (When encountering unclosed delimiters during lexing, check for diff markers)
- #117416 (Also consider TAIT to be uncomputable if the MIR body is tainted)
- #117421 (coverage: Replace impossible `coverage::Error` with assertions)
- #117438 (Do not ICE on constant evaluation failure in GVN.)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Also consider TAIT to be uncomputable if the MIR body is tainted
Not totally sure if this is the best solution. We could, alternatively, look at the hir typeck results and try to take a type from there instead of just falling back to type error, inferring `u8` instead of `{type error}`. Not certain it really matters, though.
Happy to iterate on this.
Fixes#117413
r? ``@oli-obk`` cc ``@Nadrieril``
Store #[deprecated] attribute's `since` value in parsed form
This PR implements the first followup bullet listed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117148#issue-1960240108.
We centralize error handling to the attribute parsing code in `compiler/rustc_attr/src/builtin.rs`, and thereby remove some awkward error codepaths from later phases of compilation that had to make sense of these #\[deprecated\] attributes, namely `compiler/rustc_passes/src/stability.rs` and `compiler/rustc_middle/src/middle/stability.rs`.
Detect object safety errors when assoc type is missing
When an associated type with GATs isn't specified in a `dyn Trait`, emit an object safety error instead of only complaining about the missing associated type, as it will lead the user down a path of three different errors before letting them know that what they were trying to do is impossible to begin with.
Fix#103155.
When an associated type with GATs isn't specified in a `dyn Trait`, emit
an object safety error instead of only complaining about the missing
associated type, as it will lead the user down a path of three different
errors before letting them know that what they were trying to do is
impossible to begin with.
Fix#103155.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #116862 (Detect when trait is implemented for type and suggest importing it)
- #117389 (Some diagnostics improvements of `gen` blocks)
- #117396 (Don't treat closures/coroutine types as part of the public API)
- #117398 (Correctly handle nested or-patterns in exhaustiveness)
- #117403 (Poison check_well_formed if method receivers are invalid to prevent typeck from running on it)
- #117411 (Improve some diagnostics around `?Trait` bounds)
- #117414 (Don't normalize to an un-revealed opaque when we hit the recursion limit)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Don't normalize to an un-revealed opaque when we hit the recursion limit
Currently, we will normalize `Opaque := Option<&Opaque>` to something like `Option<&Option<&Option<&...Opaque>>>`, hitting a limit and bottoming out in an unnormalized opaque after the recursion limit gets hit.
Unfortunately, during `layout_of`, we'll simply recurse and try again if the type normalizes to something different than the type:
e6e931dda5/compiler/rustc_ty_utils/src/layout.rs (L58-L60)
That means then we'll try to normalize `Option<&Option<&Option<&...Opaque>>>` again, substituting `Opaque` into itself even deeper. Eventually this will get to the point that we're just stack-overflowing on a really deep type before even hitting an opaque again.
To fix this, we just bottom out into `ty::Error` instead of the unrevealed opaque type.
Fixes#117412
r? `@oli-obk`
Improve some diagnostics around `?Trait` bounds
* uses better spans
* clarifies a message that was only talking about generic params, but applies to `dyn ?Trait` and `impl ?Trait` as well
