coverage: Avoid creating malformed macro name spans
This is a workaround for #117788. It detects a particular scenario where we would create malformed coverage spans that might cause `llvm-cov` to immediately exit with an error, preventing the user from processing coverage reports.
The patch has been kept as simple as possible so that it's trivial to backport to beta (or stable) if desired.
---
The `maybe_push_macro_name_span` method is trying to detect macro invocations, so that it can split a span into two parts just after the `!` of the invocation.
Under some circumstances (probably involving nested macros), it gets confused and produces a span that is larger than the original span, and possibly extends outside its enclosing function and even into an adjacent file.
In extreme cases, that can result in malformed coverage mappings that cause `llvm-cov` to fail. For now, we at least want to detect these egregious cases and avoid them, so that coverage reports can still be produced.
The included measurements have varied over the years. At one point there
were quite a few more, but #49558 deleted a lot that were no longer
used. Today there's just four, and it's a motley collection that doesn't
seem particularly valuable.
I think it has been well and truly subsumed by self-profiling, which
collects way more data.
This is a aspect of Rust that frequently trips up people who are not
aware of it yet. This diagnostic attempts to explain what's happening
and why the lifetime constraint, that was never mentioned in the source,
arose.
This method is trying to detect macro invocations, so that it can split a span
into two parts just after the `!` of the invocation.
Under some circumstances (probably involving nested macros), it gets confused
and produces a span that is larger than the original span, and possibly extends
outside its enclosing function and even into an adjacent file.
In extreme cases, that can result in malformed coverage mappings that cause
`llvm-cov` to fail. For now, we at least want to detect these egregious cases
and avoid them, so that coverage reports can still be produced.
Deny more `~const` trait bounds
thereby fixing a family of ICEs (delayed bugs) for `feature(const_trait_impl, effects)` code.
As discussed
r? `@fee1-dead`
Allow adding values to the `!llvm.module.flags` metadata for a generated
module. The syntax is
`-Z llvm_module_flag=<name>:<type>:<value>:<behavior>`
Currently only u32 values are supported but the type is required to be
specified for forward compatibility. The `behavior` element must match
one of the named LLVM metadata behaviors.viors.
This flag is expected to be perma-unstable.
Add `std:#️⃣:{DefaultHasher, RandomState}` exports (needs FCP)
This implements rust-lang/libs-team#267 to move the libstd hasher types to `std::hash` where they belong, instead of `std::collections::hash_map`.
<details><summary>The below no longer applies, but is kept for clarity.</summary>
This is a small refactor for #27242, which moves the definitions of `RandomState` and `DefaultHasher` into `std::hash`, but in a way that won't be noticed in the public API.
I've opened rust-lang/libs-team#267 as a formal ACP to move these directly into the root of `std::hash`, but for now, they're at least separated out from the collections code in a way that will make moving that around easier.
I decided to simply copy the rustdoc for `std::hash` from `core::hash` since I think it would be ideal for the two to diverge longer-term, especially if the ACP is accepted. However, I would be willing to factor them out into a common markdown document if that's preferred.
</details>
Partial removal of storage statements for a local is incorrect, so a
decision to optimize cannot be make independently for each statement.
Avoid the issue by performing the transformation completely or not at
all.
On method chain expression failure, look for missing method in earlier segments of the chain
This PR tries to fix the issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/115222
As suggested by `@estebank` , I did the following:
1. Add new test `tests/ui/structs/method-chain-expression-failure.rs`
2. In `compiler/rusct_hir_tycheck/src/method/suggest.rs`
walking up the method chain and calling `probe_for_name` with the method name. But the call fails to return `Ok`.
It's not clear to me (klinvill) that UserTypeProjections are produced
anymore with the removal of type ascriptions as per
https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3307. Furthermore, it's not clear
to me which variants of ProjectionElem could appear in such projections.
For these reasons, I'm reverting projections in UserTypeProjections to
simple strings until I can get more clarity on UserTypeProjections.
This commit includes richer projections for both Places and
UserTypeProjections. However, the tests only touch on Places. There are
also outstanding TODOs regarding how projections should be resolved to
produce Place types, and regarding if UserTypeProjections should just
contain ProjectionElem<(),()> objects as in MIR.
It was added way back in #28585 under the name `-Zkeep-mtwt-tables`. The
justification was:
> This is so that the resolution results can be used after analysis,
> potentially for tool support.
There are no uses of significance in the code base, and various Google
searches for both option names (and variants) found nothing of interest.
@petrochenkov says removing this part (and it's only part) of the
hygiene data is dubious. It doesn't seem that big, so let's just keep it
around.
It currently has the syntax
`current_rustc_version!(env!("CFG_RELEASE"))` where the
`env!("CFG_RELEASE")` part looks like a normal expression but it is
actually parsed and processed by the `current_rustc_version` macro.
The documented rationale for this is that you'll find it if you grep for
`env!("CFG_RELEASE")`. But I think that's of very little use -- I would
personally grep for just "CFG_RELEASE" -- and it complicates the macro,
requiring the use of `syn`.
This commit simplifies the macro.
