Fix use of SetHandleInformation on UWP
The use of `SetHandleInformation` (introduced in #96441 to make `HANDLE` inheritable) breaks UWP builds because it is not available for UWP targets.
Proposed workaround: duplicate the `HANDLE` with `inherit = true` and immediately close the old one. Traditional Windows Desktop programs are not affected.
cc `@ChrisDenton`
Add rustc_nonnull_optimization_guaranteed to Owned/Borrowed Fd/Socket
PR #94586 added support for using
`rustc_nonnull_optimization_guaranteed` on values where the "null" value
is the all-ones bitpattern.
Now that #94586 has made it to the stage0 compiler, add
`rustc_nonnull_optimization_guaranteed` to `OwnedFd`, `BorrowedFd`,
`OwnedSocket`, and `BorrowedSocket`, since these types all exclude
all-ones bitpatterns.
This allows `Option<OwnedFd>`, `Option<BorrowedFd>`, `Option<OwnedSocket>`,
and `Option<BorrowedSocket>` to be used in FFI declarations, as described
in the [I/O safety RFC].
[I/O safety RFC]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/3128-io-safety.md#ownedfd-and-borrowedfdfd-1
ExitCode::exit_process() method
cc `@yaahc` / #93840
(eeek, hit ctrl-enter before I meant to and right after realizing the branch name was wrong. oh, well)
I feel like it makes sense to have the `exit(ExitCode)` function as a method or at least associated function on ExitCode, but maybe that would hurt discoverability? Probably not as much if it's at the top of the `process::exit()` documentation or something, but idk. Also very unsure about the name, I'd like something that communicates that you are exiting with *this* ExitCode, but with a method name being postfix it doesn't seem to flow. `code.exit_process_with()` ? `.exit_process_with_self()` ? Blech. Maybe it doesn't matter, since ideally just `code.exit()` or something would be clear simply by the name and single parameter but 🤷
Also I'd like to touch up the `ExitCode` docs (which I did a bit here), but that would probably be good in a separate PR, right? Since I think the beta deadline is coming up.
Clarify what values `BorrowedHandle`, `OwnedHandle` etc. can hold.
Reword the documentation to clarify that when `BorrowedHandle`, `OwnedHandle`, or `HandleOrNull` hold the value `-1`, it always means the current process handle, and not `INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE`.
`-1` should only mean `INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE` after a call to a function documented to return that to report errors, which should lead I/O functions to produce errors rather than succeeding and producing `OwnedHandle` or `BorrowedHandle` values. So if a consumer of an `OwnedHandle` or `BorrowedHandle` ever sees them holding a `-1`, it should always mean the current process handle.
PR #94586 added support for using
`rustc_nonnull_optimization_guaranteed` on values where the "null" value
is the all-ones bitpattern.
Now that #94586 has made it to the stage0 compiler, add
`rustc_nonnull_optimization_guaranteed` to `OwnedFd`, `BorrowedFd`,
`OwnedSocket`, and `BorrowedSocket`, since these types all exclude
all-ones bitpatterns.
This allows `Option<OwnedFd>`, `Option<BorrowedFd>`, `Option<OwnedSocket>`,
and `Option<BorrowedSocket>` to be used in FFI declarations, as described
in the [I/O safety RFC].
[I/O safety RFC]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/3128-io-safety.md#ownedfd-and-borrowedfdfd-1
In the previous implementation, if the standard streams were open,
but the RLIMIT_NOFILE value was below three, the poll would fail
with EINVAL:
> ERRORS: EINVAL The nfds value exceeds the RLIMIT_NOFILE value.
Switch to the existing fcntl based implementation to avoid the issue.
Clarify that when `BorrowedHandle`, `OwnedHandle`, or `HandleOrNull`
hold the value `-1`, it always means the current process handle, and not
`INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE`.
Make `BorrowedFd::borrow_raw` a const fn.
Making `BorrowedFd::borrow_raw` a const fn allows it to be used to
create a constant `BorrowedFd<'static>` holding constants such as
`AT_FDCWD`. This will allow [`rustix::fs::cwd`] to become a const fn.
For consistency, make similar changes to `BorrowedHandle::borrow_raw`
and `BorrowedSocket::borrow_raw`.
[`rustix::fs::cwd`]: https://docs.rs/rustix/latest/rustix/fs/fn.cwd.html
r? `@joshtriplett`
CC #27709 (tracking issue for the `ip` feature which contains more
functions)
The function `Ipv6Addr::to_ipv4` is bad because it also returns an IPv4
address for the IPv6 loopback address `::1`. Stabilize
`Ipv6Addr::to_ipv4_mapped` so we can recommend that function instead.
Issue #84096 changed the hashmap RNG to use BCryptGenRandom instead of
RtlGenRandom on Windows.
Mozilla Firefox started experiencing random failures in
env_logger::Builder::new() (Issue #94098) during initialization of their
unsandboxed main process with an "Access Denied" error message from
BCryptGenRandom(), which is used by the HashMap contained in
env_logger::Builder
The root cause appears to be a virus scanner or other software interfering
with BCrypt DLLs loading.
This change adds a fallback option if BCryptGenRandom is unusable for
whatever reason. It will fallback to RtlGenRandom in this case.
Fixes#94098
Revert "Implement [OsStr]::join", which was merged without FCP.
This reverts commit 4fcbc53820, see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/96744. (I'm terribly sorry, and truly don't remember r+ing it, or even having seen it before yesterday, which is... genuinely very worrisome for me).
r? `@m-ou-se`
Improve floating point documentation
This is my attempt to improve/solve https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/95468 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73328 .
Added/refined explanations:
- Refine the "NaN as a special value" top level explanation of f32
- Refine `const NAN` docstring: add an explanation about there being multitude of NaN bitpatterns and disclaimer about the portability/stability guarantees.
- Refine `fn is_sign_positive` and `fn is_sign_negative` docstrings: add disclaimer about the sign bit of NaNs.
- Refine `fn min` and `fn max` docstrings: explain the semantics and their relationship to the standard and libm better.
- Refine `fn trunc` docstrings: explain the semantics slightly more.
- Refine `fn powi` docstrings: add disclaimer that the rounding behaviour might be different from `powf`.
- Refine `fn copysign` docstrings: add disclaimer about payloads of NaNs.
- Refine `minimum` and `maximum`: add disclaimer that "propagating NaN" doesn't mean that propagating the NaN bit patterns is guaranteed.
- Refine `max` and `min` docstrings: add "ignoring NaN" to bring the one-row explanation to parity with `minimum` and `maximum`.
Cosmetic changes:
- Reword `NaN` and `NAN` as plain "NaN", unless they refer to the specific `const NAN`.
- Reword "a number" to `self` in function docstrings to clarify.
- Remove "Returns NAN if the number is NAN" from `abs`, as this is told to be the default behavior in the top explanation.
Remove `#[rustc_deprecated]`
This removes `#[rustc_deprecated]` and introduces diagnostics to help users to the right direction (that being `#[deprecated]`). All uses of `#[rustc_deprecated]` have been converted. CI is expected to fail initially; this requires #95958, which includes converting `stdarch`.
I plan on following up in a short while (maybe a bootstrap cycle?) removing the diagnostics, as they're only intended to be short-term.
Add more diagnostic items
This just adds a handful diagnostic items I noticed were missing.
Would it be worth doing this for all of the remaining types? I'm willing to do it if it'd be helpful.
Create clippy lint against unexpectedly late drop for temporaries in match scrutinee expressions
A new clippy lint for issue 93883 (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/93883). Relies on a new trait in `marker` (called `SignificantDrop` to enable linting), which is why this PR is for the rust-lang repo and not the clippy repo.
changelog: new lint [`significant_drop_in_scrutinee`]
Remove hard links from `env::current_exe` security example
The security example shows that `env::current_exe` will return the path used when the program was started. This is not really surprising considering how hard links work: after `ln foo bar`, the two files are _equivalent_. It is _not_ the case that `bar` is a “link” to `foo`, nor is `foo` a link to `bar`. They are simply two names for the same underlying data.
The security vulnerability linked to seems to be different: there an attacker would start a SUID binary from a directory under the control of the attacker. The binary would respawn itself by executing the program found at `/proc/self/exe` (which the attacker can control). This is a real problem. In my opinion, the example given here doesn’t really show the same problem, it just shows a misunderstanding of what hard links are.
I looked through the history a bit and found that the example was introduced in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/33526. That PR actually has two commits, and the first (8478d48dad) explains the race condition at the root of the linked security vulnerability. The second commit proceeds to replace the explanation with the example we have today.
This commit reverts most of the second commit from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/33526.
Add aliases for std::fs::canonicalize
The aliases are `realpath` and `GetFinalPathNameByHandle` which are explicitly mentioned in `canonicalize`'s documentation.
Use 64-bit time on 32-bit linux-gnu
The standard library suffered the [Year 2038 problem][Y2038] in two main places on targets with 32-bit `time_t`:
- In `std::time::SystemTime`, we stored a `timespec` that has `time_t` seconds. This is now changed to directly store 64-bit seconds and nanoseconds, and on 32-bit linux-gnu we try to use `__clock_gettime64` (glibc 2.34+) to get the larger timestamp.
- In `std::fs::Metadata`, we store a `stat64`, which has 64-bit `off_t` but still 32-bit `time_t`, and unfortunately that is baked in the API by the (deprecated) `MetadataExt::as_raw_stat()`. However, we can use `statx` for 64-bit `statx_timestamp` to store in addition to the `stat64`, as we already do to support creation time, and the rest of the `MetadataExt` methods can return those full values. Note that some filesystems may still be limited in their actual timestamp support, but that's not something Rust can change.
There remain a few places that need `timespec` for system call timeouts -- I leave that to future work.
[Y2038]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2038_problem
