`SessionDiagnostic` isn't suitable for use on lints as whether or not it
creates an error or a warning is decided at compile-time by the macro,
whereas lints decide this at runtime based on the location of the lint
being reported (as it will depend on the user's `allow`/`deny`
attributes, etc). Re-using most of the machinery for
`SessionDiagnostic`, this macro introduces a `LintDiagnostic` derive
which implements a `DecorateLint` trait, taking a
`LintDiagnosticBuilder` and adding to the lint according to the
diagnostic struct.
`sess` field of `SessionDiagnosticDeriveBuilder` is never actually used
in the builder's member functions, so it doesn't need to be a field.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
Move the logic for building a field mapping (which is used by the
building of format strings in `suggestion` annotations) into a helper
function.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
lints: mostly translatable diagnostics
As lints are created slightly differently than other diagnostics, intended to try make them translatable first and then look into the applicability of diagnostic structs but ended up just making most of the diagnostics in the crate translatable (which will still be useful if I do make a lot of them structs later anyway).
r? ``@compiler-errors``
Change enum->int casts to not go through MIR casts.
follow-up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/96814
this simplifies all backends and even gives LLVM more information about the return value of `Rvalue::Discriminant`, enabling optimizations in more cases.
clean up the borrowing in rustc_hir_pretty
A whole lot of the `&`s and `ref`s were redundant. I hope doing this in one big commit is fine, because all of the changes are pretty self-contained.
`@rustbot` label: +C-cleanup
fix interpreter validity check on Box
Follow-up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/98554: avoid walking over parts of the value twice.
And then move all that logic into the general visitor so not each visitor implementation has to deal with it...
Interpret: AllocRange Debug impl, and use it more consistently
The two commits are pretty independent but it did not seem worth having two PRs for them.
r? ``@oli-obk``
more `need_type_info` improvements
this now deals with macros in suggestions and the source cost computation does what I want for `channel` 🎉
r? ``@estebank``
Add method to mutate MIR body without invalidating CFG caches.
In addition to adding this method, a handful of passes are updated to use it. There's still quite a few passes that could in principle make use of this as well, but do not at the moment because they use `VisitorMut` or `MirPatch`, which needs additional support for this.
The method name is slightly unwieldy, but I don't expect anyone to be writing it a lot, and at least it says what it does. If anyone has a suggestion for a better name though, would be happy to rename.
r? rust-lang/mir-opt
We currently do a match on the comparison of every field in a struct or
enum variant. But the last field has a degenerate match like this:
```
match ::core::cmp::Ord::cmp(&self.y, &other.y) {
::core::cmp::Ordering::Equal =>
::core::cmp::Ordering::Equal,
cmp => cmp,
},
```
This commit changes it to this:
```
::core::cmp::Ord::cmp(&self.y, &other.y),
```
This is fairly straightforward thanks to the existing `cs_fold1`
function.
The commit also removes the `cs_fold` function which is no longer used.
(Note: there is some repetition now in `cs_cmp` and `cs_partial_cmp`. I
will remove that in a follow-up PR.)
incr.comp.: Make split-dwarf commandline options [TRACKED].
This commandline options have an influence on the contents of object files (and .dwo files), so they need to be `[TRACKED]`.
r? `@davidtwco`
interpret: don't rely on ScalarPair for overflowed arithmetic
This is for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/97861.
Cc `@eddyb`
I would like to avoid making this depend on `dest.layout.abi` to avoid a branch that we are not usually covering both sides of. Though OTOH this seems like fairly straight-forward code. But let's benchmark this option first to see how bad that extra `force_allocation` really is.
