LLVM can usually optimize these away, but especially for things like transmutes of newtypes it's silly to generate the `alloc`+`store`+`load` at all when it's actually a nop at LLVM level.
Do not suppress temporary_cstring_as_ptr in macros.
There isn't really a reason to skip the lint when part of the expression comes from an expansion.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/94694
Move a const-prop-lint specific hack from mir interpret to const-prop-lint and make it fallible
fixes#109743
This hack didn't need to live in the mir interpreter. For const-prop-lint it is entirely correct to avoid doing any const prop if normalization fails at this stage. Most likely we couldn't const propagate anything anyway, and if revealing was needed (so opaque types were involved), we wouldn't want to be too smart and leak the hidden type anyway.
Don't collect return-position impl traits for documentation
#104889 modified the rustdoc ast collection step to use a HIR visitor, which more thoroughly walks the HIR tree. that means that we're going to encounter inner items (incl return-position impl traits and async fn opaque futures) that are not possible to document.
FIxes (but does not close due to being a beta regression) #109931
r? `@GuillaumeGomez`
rustdoc: escape GAT args in more cases
Fixes#109488.
Previously we printed the *un*escaped form of GAT arguments not only when `f.alternate()` was true but *also* when we failed to compute the URL of the trait associated with the type projection, i.e. when `href(…)` returned an `Err(_)`.
In this PR the argument printing logic is entirely separate from the link resolution code above as it should be.
Further, we now only try to compute the URL if the HTML format was requested with `!f.alternate()`. Before, we would sometimes compute the `href` only to throw it away later.
Emit feature error for parenthesized generics in associated type bounds
We don't actually do AST->HIR lowering with some `-Zunpretty` flags, so it's not correct to just delay a bug instead of emitting a feature error.
Some diagnostics regressed because of the new errors, but oh well. 🤷Fixes#109898
Fix `non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns` lint span
Fixes#109837
`DUMMY_SP` was being passed as the span in many cases where we have a span available to use. This meant that the location of the violating pattern wasn't shown, or the list of un-covered variants
r? `@Nilstrieb`
Pull some tuple variant fields out into their own struct
This is groundwork for adding more fields to those new structs, but I believe the change to be useful on its own.
r? `@Nilstrieb` but feel free to reroll for `compiler`
Previously if the expression contained generic consts and did not have a directly equivalent
type, transmuting the type in this way was forbidden, despite the two sizes being identical.
Instead, we should be able to lazily tell if the two consts are identical, and if so allow them
to be transmuted.
Never consider int and float vars for `FnPtr` candidates
This solves a regression where `0.0.cmp()` was ambiguous when a custom trait with a `cmp` method was in scope.
For integers it shouldn't be a problem in practice so I wasn't able to add a test.
I'm not sure whether there could be more issues hidden in the shadows as mentioned in the issue, but this should at least fix the problematic regression immediately.
fixes#109892
r? oli-obk
This solves a regression where `0.0.cmp()` was ambiguous when a custom
trait with a `cmp` method was in scope.
FOr integers it shouldn't be a problem in practice so I wasn't able to
add a test.
