Pin::new_unchecked: discuss pinning closure captures
Regardless of how the discussion in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/102737 turns out, pinning closure captures is super subtle business and probably worth discussing separately.
Fix doc example for `wrapping_abs`
The `max` variable is unused. This change introduces the `min_plus` variable, to make the example similar to the one from `saturating_abs`. An alternative would be to remove the unused variable.
add examples to chunks remainder methods.
add examples to chunks remainder methods.
my motivation for adding the examples was to make it very clear that the state of the iterator (in terms of where its cursor lies) has no effect on what remainder returns.
Also fixed some links to rchunk remainder methods.
This moves the stable sort implementation to the core::slice::sort module. By
virtue of being in core it can't access `Vec`. The two `Vec` used by merge sort,
`buf` and `runs`, are modelled as custom types that implement the very limited
required `Vec` interface with the help of provided allocation and free
functions. This is done to allow future re-use of functions and logic between
stable and unstable sort. Such as `insert_head`.
clarify that realloc refreshes pointer provenance even when the allocation remains in-place
This [matches what C does](https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/memory/realloc):
> The original pointer ptr is invalidated and any access to it is undefined behavior (even if reallocation was in-place).
Cc `@rust-lang/wg-allocators`
`VecDeque::resize` should re-use the buffer in the passed-in element
Today it always copies it for *every* appended element, but one of those clones is avoidable.
This adds `iter::repeat_n` (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/104434) as the primitive needed to do this. If this PR is acceptable, I'll also use this in `Vec` rather than its custom `ExtendElement` type & infrastructure that is harder to share between multiple different containers:
101e1822c3/library/alloc/src/vec/mod.rs (L2479-L2492)
* Fix doc examples for Platforms with underaligned integer primitives.
* Mutable pointer doc examples use mutable pointers.
* Fill out tracking issue.
* Minor formatting changes.
Enforce that `dyn*` coercions are actually pointer-sized
Implement a perma-unstable, rudimentary `PointerSized` trait to enforce `dyn*` casts are `usize`-sized for now, at least to prevent ICEs and weird codegen issues from cropping up after monomorphization since currently we enforce *nothing*.
This probably can/should be removed in favor of a more sophisticated trait for handling `dyn*` conversions when we decide on one, but I just want to get something up for discussion and experimentation for now.
r? ```@eholk``` cc ```@tmandry``` (though feel free to claim/reassign)
Fixes#102141Fixes#102173
Simplify some pointer method implementations
- Make `pointer::with_metadata_of` const (+simplify implementation) (cc #75091)
- Simplify implementation of various pointer methods
r? ```@scottmcm```
----
`from_raw_parts::<T>(this, metadata(self))` was annoying me for a while and I've finally figured out how it should _actually_ be done.
Fix mod_inv termination for the last iteration
On usize=u64 platforms, the 4th iteration would overflow the `mod_gate` back to 0. Similarly for usize=u32 platforms, the 3rd iteration would overflow much the same way.
I tested various approaches to resolving this, including approaches with `saturating_mul` and `widening_mul` to a double usize. Turns out LLVM likes `mul_with_overflow` the best. In fact now, that LLVM can see the iteration count is limited, it will happily unroll the loop into a nice linear sequence.
You will also notice that the code around the loop got simplified somewhat. Now that LLVM is handling the loop nicely, there isn’t any more reasons to manually unroll the first iteration out of the loop (though looking at the code today I’m not sure all that complexity was necessary in the first place).
Fixes#103361
