Fix `...` in multline code-skips in suggestions
When we have long code skips, we write `...` in the line number gutter.
For suggestions, we were "centering" the `...` with the line, but that was inconsistent with what we do in every other case *and* off-center.
Add `f16` inline ASM support for 32-bit ARM
Adds `f16` inline ASM support for 32-bit ARM. SIMD vector types are taken from [here](https://developer.arm.com/architectures/instruction-sets/intrinsics/#f:`@navigationhierarchiesreturnbasetype=[float]&f:@navigationhierarchieselementbitsize=[16]&f:@navigationhierarchiesarchitectures=[A32]).`
Relevant issue: #125398
Tracking issue: #116909
`@rustbot` label +F-f16_and_f128
Added an associated `const THIS_IMPLEMENTATION_HAS_BEEN_TRIPLE_CHECKED`
to the `StableOrd` trait to ensure that implementors carefully consider
whether the trait's contract is upheld, as incorrect implementations can
cause miscompilations.
Add a tidy rule to check that fluent messages and attrs don't end in `.`
This adds a new dependency on `fluent-parse` to `tidy` -- we already rely on it in rustc so I feel like it's not that big of a deal.
This PR also adjusts many error messages that currently end in `.`; not all of them since I added an `ALLOWLIST`, excluded `rustc_codegen_*` ftl files, and `.teach_note` attributes.
r? ``@estebank`` ``@oli-obk``
Add `f16` inline ASM support for RISC-V
This PR adds `f16` inline ASM support for RISC-V. A `FIXME` is left for `f128` support as LLVM does not support the required `Q` (Quad-Precision Floating-Point) extension yet.
Relevant issue: #125398
Tracking issue: #116909
`@rustbot` label +F-f16_and_f128
These things don't need to be `Vec`s; boxed slices are enough.
The frequent one here is call arguments, but MIR building knows the number of arguments from the THIR, so the collect is always getting the allocation right in the first place, and thus this shouldn't ever add the shrink-in-place overhead.
Rename a bunch of things in the new solver and `rustc_type_ir`
* Renames `interner()` to `cx()` in the solver and `TypeFolder`.
* Renames `Infcx` generic param to `D`
* Moves `infcx.rs` to `delegate.rs`
r? lcnr
Stop sorting `Span`s' `SyntaxContext`, as that is incompatible with incremental
work towards https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90317
Luckily no one actually needed these to be sorted, so it didn't even affect diagnostics. I'm guessing they'd have been sorted by creation time anyway, so it wouldn't really have mattered.
r? `@cjgillot`
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #126125 (Improve conflict marker recovery)
- #126481 (Add `powerpc-unknown-openbsd` maintenance status)
- #126613 (Print the tested value in int_log tests)
- #126617 (Expand `avx512_target_feature` to include VEX variants)
- #126700 (Make edition dependent `:expr` macro fragment act like the edition-dependent `:pat` fragment does)
- #126707 (Pass target to inaccessible-temp-dir rmake test)
- #126767 (`StaticForeignItem` and `StaticItem` are the same)
- #126774 (Fix another assertion failure for some Expect diagnostics.)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
More ptr metadata gvn
There's basically 3 parts to this PR.
1. Allow references as arguments to `UnOp::PtrMetadata`
This is a MIR semantics addition, so
r? mir
Rather than just raw pointers, also allow references to be passed to `PtrMetadata`. That means the length of a slice can be just `PtrMetadata(_1)` instead of also needing a ref-to-pointer statement (`_2 = &raw *_1` + `PtrMetadata(_2)`).
AFAIK there should be no provenance or tagging implications of looking at the *metadata* of a pointer, and the code in the backends actually already supported it (other than a debug assert, given that they don't care about ptr vs reference, really), so we might as well allow it.
2. Simplify the argument to `PtrMetadata` in GVN
Because the specific kind of pointer-like thing isn't that important, GVN can simplify all those details away. Things like `*const`-to-`*mut` casts and `&mut`-to-`&` reborrows are irrelevant, and skipping them lets it see more interesting things.
cc `@cjgillot`
Notably, unsizing casts for arrays. GVN supported that for `Len`, and now it sees it for `PtrMetadata` as well, allowing `PtrMetadata(pointer)` to become a constant if that pointer came from an array-to-slice unsizing, even through a bunch of other possible steps.
3. Replace `NormalizeArrayLen` with GVN
The `NormalizeArrayLen` pass hasn't been running even in optimized builds for well over a year, and it turns out that GVN -- which *is* on in optimized builds -- can do everything it was trying to do.
So the code for the pass is deleted, but the tests are kept, just changed to the different pass.
As part of this, `LowerSliceLen` was changed to emit `PtrMetadata(_1)` instead of `Len(*_1)`, a small step on the road to eventually eliminating `Rvalue::Len`.
Fix another assertion failure for some Expect diagnostics.
Very similar to #126719. So much so that I added a new case to the test from that PR rather than creating a new one.
r? `@oli-obk`
`StaticForeignItem` and `StaticItem` are the same
The struct `StaticItem` and `StaticForeignItem` are the same, so remove `StaticForeignItem`. Having them be separate is unique to `static` items -- unlike `ForeignItemKind::{Fn,TyAlias}`, which use the normal AST item.
r? ``@spastorino`` or ``@oli-obk``
Make edition dependent `:expr` macro fragment act like the edition-dependent `:pat` fragment does
Parse the `:expr` fragment as `:expr_2021` in editions <=2021, and as `:expr` in edition 2024. This is similar to how we parse `:pat` as `:pat_param` in edition <=2018 and `:pat_with_or` in >=2021, and means we can get rid of a span dependency from `nonterminal_may_begin_with`.
Specifically, this fixes a theoretical regression since the `expr_2021` macro fragment previously would allow `const {}` if the *caller* is edition 2024. This is inconsistent with the way that the `pat` macro fragment was upgraded, and also leads to surprising behavior when a macro *caller* crate upgrades to edtion 2024, since they may have parsing changes that they never asked for (with no way of opting out of it).
This PR also allows using `expr_2021` in all editions. Why was this was disallowed in the first place? It's purely additive, and also it's still feature gated?
r? ```@fmease``` ```@eholk``` cc ```@vincenzopalazzo```
cc #123865
Tracking:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123742
Expand `avx512_target_feature` to include VEX variants
Added 5 new target features for x86:
- `AVX-IFMA`
- `AVX-NE-CONVERT`
- `AVX-VNNI`
- `AVX-VNNI_INT8`
- `AVX-VNNI_INT16`
Both LLVM and GCC already have support for these.
See also the [stdarch PR](https://github.com/rust-lang/stdarch/pull/1586)
Improve conflict marker recovery
<!--
If this PR is related to an unstable feature or an otherwise tracked effort,
please link to the relevant tracking issue here. If you don't know of a related
tracking issue or there are none, feel free to ignore this.
This PR will get automatically assigned to a reviewer. In case you would like
a specific user to review your work, you can assign it to them by using
r? <reviewer name>
-->
closes#113826
r? ```@estebank``` since you reviewed #115413
cc: ```@rben01``` since you opened up the issue in the first place
