Emit a wrap expr span_bug only if context is not tainted
Fixes#127332
The ICE occurs because of this `span_bug`: 51917e2e69/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/expr_use_visitor.rs (L732-L738)
which is triggered by the fact that we're trying to use an `enum` in a `with` expression instead of a `struct`.
The issue originates in commit 814bfe9335 from PR #127202. As per the title of that commit the ICEing code should not be reachable any more, but looks like it still is.
This PR changes the code so that the `span_bug` will be emitted only if the context is not tainted by a previous error.
Currently the second element is a `Vec<(FlatToken, Spacing)>`. But the
vector always has zero or one elements, and the `FlatToken` is always
`FlatToken::AttrTarget` (which contains an `AttributesData`), and the
spacing is always `Alone`. So we can simplify it to
`Option<AttributesData>`.
An assertion in `to_attr_token_stream` can can also be removed, because
`new_tokens.len()` was always 0 or 1, which means than `range.len()`
is always greater than or equal to it, because `range.is_empty()` is
always false (as per the earlier assertion).
The only place it is meaningfully used is in a panic message in
`TokenStream::from_ast`. But `node.span()` doesn't need to be printed
because `node` is also printed and it must contain the span.
Don't try to label `ObligationCauseCode::CompareImplItem` for an RPITIT, since it has no name
The old (current) trait solver has a limitation that when a where clause in param-env must be normalized using the same where clause, then we get spurious errors in `normalize_param_env_or_error`. I don't think there's an issue tracking it, but it's the root cause for many of the "fixed-by-next-solver" labeled issues.
Specifically, these errors may occur when checking predicate entailment of the GAT that comes out of desugaring RPITITs. Since we use `ObligationCauseCode::CompareImplItem` for these predicates, we try calling `item_name` on an RPITIT which fails, since the RPITIT has no name.
We simply suppress this logic when we're reporting a predicate entailment error for an RPITIT. RPITITs should never have predicate entailment errors, *by construction*, but they may due to this bug in the old solver.
Addresses the ICE in #127331, though doesn't fix the underlying issue (which is fundamental to the old solver).
r? types
Uplift outlives components to `rustc_type_ir`
We need this to uplift `push_outlives_components`, since the elaborator uses `push_outlives_components` to elaborate type outlives obligations and I want to uplift elaboration.
This ends up reworking and inlining a fair portion of the `GenericArg::walk_shallow` function, whose only callsite was this one. I believe I got the logic correct, but may be worthwhile to look at it closely just in case. Unfortunately github was too dumb to understand that this is a rename + change -- I could also rework the git history to split the "copy the file over" part from the actual logical changes if that makes this easier to review.
r? lcnr
Elaboration tweaks
Removes `Filter::OnlySelfThatDefines` and reimplements `transitive_bounds_that_define_assoc_item` as a separate function, since I don't want to have to uplift that mode since it's both an implementation detail (only exists to avoid cycles in astconv) and requires exposing `Ident` as an associated type on `Interner`.
r? lcnr
offset_from, offset: clearly separate safety requirements the user needs to prove from corollaries that automatically follow
By landing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116675 we decided that objects larger than `isize::MAX` cannot exist in the address space of a Rust program, which lets us simplify these rules.
For `offset_from`, we can even state that the *absolute* distance fits into an `isize`, and therefore exclude `isize::MIN`. This PR also changes Miri to treat an `isize::MIN` difference like the other isize-overflowing cases.
