Use a multipart suggestion instead of a single whole-span replacement:
```
error[E0796]: creating a shared reference to a mutable static
--> $DIR/reference-to-mut-static-unsafe-fn.rs:10:18
|
LL | let _y = &X;
| ^^ shared reference to mutable static
|
= note: this shared reference has lifetime `'static`, but if the static ever gets mutated, or a mutable reference is created, then any further use of this shared reference is Undefined Behavior
help: use `addr_of!` instead to create a raw pointer
|
LL | let _y = addr_of!(X);
| ~~~~~~~~~ +
```
```
error[E0560]: struct `S` has no field named `x`
--> $DIR/nested-non-tuple-tuple-struct.rs:8:19
|
LL | pub struct S(f32, f32);
| - `S` defined here
...
LL | let _x = (S { x: 1.0, y: 2.0 }, S { x: 3.0, y: 4.0 });
| ^ field does not exist
|
help: `S` is a tuple struct, use the appropriate syntax
|
LL | let _x = (S(/* f32 */, /* f32 */), S { x: 3.0, y: 4.0 });
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
```
```
error[E0533]: expected value, found struct variant `E::Empty3`
--> $DIR/empty-struct-braces-expr.rs:18:14
|
LL | let e3 = E::Empty3;
| ^^^^^^^^^ not a value
|
help: you might have meant to create a new value of the struct
|
LL | let e3 = E::Empty3 {};
| ++
```
```
error[E0533]: expected value, found struct variant `E::V`
--> $DIR/struct-literal-variant-in-if.rs:10:13
|
LL | if x == E::V { field } {}
| ^^^^ not a value
|
help: you might have meant to create a new value of the struct
|
LL | if x == (E::V { field }) {}
| + +
```
```
error[E0618]: expected function, found enum variant `Enum::Unit`
--> $DIR/suggestion-highlights.rs:15:5
|
LL | Unit,
| ---- enum variant `Enum::Unit` defined here
...
LL | Enum::Unit();
| ^^^^^^^^^^--
| |
| call expression requires function
|
help: `Enum::Unit` is a unit enum variant, and does not take parentheses to be constructed
|
LL - Enum::Unit();
LL + Enum::Unit;
|
```
```
error[E0599]: no variant or associated item named `tuple` found for enum `Enum` in the current scope
--> $DIR/suggestion-highlights.rs:36:11
|
LL | enum Enum {
| --------- variant or associated item `tuple` not found for this enum
...
LL | Enum::tuple;
| ^^^^^ variant or associated item not found in `Enum`
|
help: there is a variant with a similar name
|
LL | Enum::Tuple(/* i32 */);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;
|
```
The second suggestion shown here would previously incorrectly assume that the span corresponding to `⩵` was 2 bytes wide composed by 2 1 byte wide chars, so a span pointing at `==` could point only at one of the `=` to remove it. Instead, we now replace the whole thing (as we should have the whole time):
```
error: unknown start of token: \u{2a75}
--> $DIR/unicode-double-equals-recovery.rs:1:16
|
LL | const A: usize ⩵ 2;
| ^
|
help: Unicode character '⩵' (Two Consecutive Equals Signs) looks like '==' (Double Equals Sign), but it is not
|
LL | const A: usize == 2;
| ~~
error: unexpected `==`
--> $DIR/unicode-double-equals-recovery.rs:1:16
|
LL | const A: usize ⩵ 2;
| ^
|
help: try using `=` instead
|
LL | const A: usize = 2;
| ~
```
make pub_use_of_private_extern_crate show up in cargo's future breakage reports
This has been a lint for many years.
However, turns out that outright removing it right now would lead to [tons of crater regressions](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127656#issuecomment-2233288534) due to crates depending on an ancient version of `bitflags`. So for now this PR just makes this future-compat lint show up in cargo's reports, so people are warned when they use a dependency that is affected by this.
r? `@petrochenkov`
Fix ambiguous cases of multiple & in elided self lifetimes
This change proposes simpler rules to identify the lifetime on `self` parameters which may be used to elide a return type lifetime.
## The old rules
(copied from [this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117967#discussion_r1420554242))
Most of the code can be found in [late.rs](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nightly-rustc/src/rustc_resolve/late.rs.html) and acts on AST types. The function [resolve_fn_params](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nightly-rustc/src/rustc_resolve/late.rs.html#2006), in the success case, returns a single lifetime which can be used to elide the lifetime of return types.
Here's how:
* If the first parameter is called self then we search that parameter using "`self` search rules", below
* If no unique applicable lifetime was found, search all other parameters using "regular parameter search rules", below
(In practice the code does extra work to assemble good diagnostic information, so it's not quite laid out like the above.)
### `self` search rules
This is primarily handled in [find_lifetime_for_self](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nightly-rustc/src/rustc_resolve/late.rs.html#2118) , and is described slightly [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/117715#issuecomment-1813115477) already. The code:
1. Recursively walks the type of the `self` parameter (there's some complexity about resolving various special cases, but it's essentially just walking the type as far as I can see)
2. Each time we find a reference anywhere in the type, if the **direct** referent is `Self` (either spelled `Self` or by some alias resolution which I don't fully understand), then we'll add that to a set of candidate lifetimes
3. If there's exactly one such unique lifetime candidate found, we return this lifetime.
### Regular parameter search rules
1. Find all the lifetimes in each parameter, including implicit, explicit etc.
2. If there's exactly one parameter containing lifetimes, and if that parameter contains exactly one (unique) lifetime, *and if we didn't find a `self` lifetime parameter already*, we'll return this lifetime.
## The new rules
There are no changes to the "regular parameter search rules" or to the overall flow, only to the `self` search rules which are now:
1. Recursively walks the type of the `self` parameter, searching for lifetimes of reference types whose referent **contains** `Self`.[^1]
2. Keep a record of:
* Whether 0, 1 or n unique lifetimes are found on references encountered during the walk
4. If no lifetime was found, we don't return a lifetime. (This means other parameters' lifetimes may be used for return type lifetime elision).
5. If there's one lifetime found, we return the lifetime.
6. If multiple lifetimes were found, we abort elision entirely (other parameters' lifetimes won't be used).
[^1]: this prevents us from considering lifetimes from inside of the self-type
## Examples that were accepted before and will now be rejected
```rust
fn a(self: &Box<&Self>) -> &u32
fn b(self: &Pin<&mut Self>) -> &String
fn c(self: &mut &Self) -> Option<&Self>
fn d(self: &mut &Box<Self>, arg: &usize) -> &usize // previously used the lt from arg
```
### Examples that change the elided lifetime
```rust
fn e(self: &mut Box<Self>, arg: &usize) -> &usize
// ^ new ^ previous
```
## Examples that were rejected before and will now be accepted
```rust
fn f(self: &Box<Self>) -> &u32
```
---
*edit: old PR description:*
```rust
struct Concrete(u32);
impl Concrete {
fn m(self: &Box<Self>) -> &u32 {
&self.0
}
}
```
resulted in a confusing error.
```rust
impl Concrete {
fn n(self: &Box<&Self>) -> &u32 {
&self.0
}
}
```
resulted in no error or warning, despite apparent ambiguity over the elided lifetime.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/117715
cleanup: remove support for 3DNow! cpu features
In llvm/llvm-project@f0eb5587ce all support for 3DNow! intrinsics and instructions were removed. Per the commit message there, only AMD chips between 1998 and 2011 or so actually supported these instructions, and they were effectively replaced by SSE which was available on many more chips. I'd be very surprised if anyone had ever used these from Rust.
`@rustbot` label: +llvm-main
Remove `TrailingToken`.
It's used in `Parser::collect_tokens_trailing_token` to decide whether to capture a trailing token. But the callers actually know whether to capture a trailing token, so it's simpler for them to just pass in a bool.
Also, the `TrailingToken::Gt` case was weird, because it didn't result in a trailing token being captured. It could have been subsumed by the `TrailingToken::MaybeComma` case, and it effectively is in the new code.
r? `@petrochenkov`
It's used in `Parser::collect_tokens_trailing_token` to decide whether
to capture a trailing token. But the callers actually know whether to
capture a trailing token, so it's simpler for them to just pass in a
bool.
Also, the `TrailingToken::Gt` case was weird, because it didn't result
in a trailing token being captured. It could have been subsumed by the
`TrailingToken::MaybeComma` case, and it effectively is in the new code.
More accurate span for anonymous argument suggestion
Use smaller span for suggesting adding `_:` ahead of a type:
```
error: expected one of `(`, `...`, `..=`, `..`, `::`, `:`, `{`, or `|`, found `)`
--> $DIR/anon-params-denied-2018.rs:12:47
|
LL | fn foo_with_qualified_path(<Bar as T>::Baz);
| ^ expected one of 8 possible tokens
|
= note: anonymous parameters are removed in the 2018 edition (see RFC 1685)
help: explicitly ignore the parameter name
|
LL | fn foo_with_qualified_path(_: <Bar as T>::Baz);
| ++
```
More accurate span for type parameter suggestion
After:
```
error[E0229]: associated item constraints are not allowed here
--> $DIR/impl-block-params-declared-in-wrong-spot-issue-113073.rs:3:10
|
LL | impl Foo<T: Default> for String {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^ associated item constraint not allowed here
|
help: declare the type parameter right after the `impl` keyword
|
LL - impl Foo<T: Default> for String {}
LL + impl<T: Default> Foo<T> for String {}
|
```
Before:
```
error[E0229]: associated item constraints are not allowed here
--> $DIR/impl-block-params-declared-in-wrong-spot-issue-113073.rs:3:10
|
LL | impl Foo<T: Default> for String {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^ associated item constraint not allowed here
|
help: declare the type parameter right after the `impl` keyword
|
LL | impl<T: Default> Foo<T> for String {}
| ++++++++++++ ~
```
Accurate `use` rename suggestion span
When suggesting to rename an import with `as`, use a smaller span to render the suggestion with a better format:
```
error[E0252]: the name `baz` is defined multiple times
--> $DIR/issue-25396.rs:4:5
|
LL | use foo::baz;
| -------- previous import of the module `baz` here
LL | use bar::baz;
| ^^^^^^^^ `baz` reimported here
|
= note: `baz` must be defined only once in the type namespace of this module
help: you can use `as` to change the binding name of the import
|
LL | use bar::baz as other_baz;
| ++++++++++++
```
Fix associated item removal suggestion
We were previously telling people to write what was already there, instead of removal (treating it as a `help`). We now properly suggest to remove the code that needs to be removed.
```
error[E0229]: associated item constraints are not allowed here
--> $DIR/E0229.rs:13:25
|
LL | fn baz<I>(x: &<I as Foo<A = Bar>>::A) {}
| ^^^^^^^ associated item constraint not allowed here
|
help: consider removing this associated item binding
|
LL - fn baz<I>(x: &<I as Foo<A = Bar>>::A) {}
LL + fn baz<I>(x: &<I as Foo>::A) {}
|
```
Some parser improvements
I was looking closely at attribute handling in the parser while debugging some issues relating to #124141, and found a few small improvements.
``@spastorino``
Fix precise capturing suggestion for hidden regions when we have APITs
Suggests to turn APITs into type parameters so they can be named in precise capturing syntax for hidden type lifetime errors. We also note that it may change the API.
This is currently done via a note *and* a suggestion, which feels a bit redundant, but I wasn't totally sure of a better alternative for the presentation.
Code is kind of a mess but there's a lot of cases to consider. Happy to iterate on this if you think the approach is too messy.
Based on #127619, only the last commit is relevant.
r? oli-obk
Tracking:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123432
Use smaller span for suggesting adding `_:` ahead of a type:
```
error: expected one of `(`, `...`, `..=`, `..`, `::`, `:`, `{`, or `|`, found `)`
--> $DIR/anon-params-denied-2018.rs:12:47
|
LL | fn foo_with_qualified_path(<Bar as T>::Baz);
| ^ expected one of 8 possible tokens
|
= note: anonymous parameters are removed in the 2018 edition (see RFC 1685)
help: explicitly ignore the parameter name
|
LL | fn foo_with_qualified_path(_: <Bar as T>::Baz);
| ++
```
After:
```
error[E0229]: associated item constraints are not allowed here
--> $DIR/impl-block-params-declared-in-wrong-spot-issue-113073.rs:3:10
|
LL | impl Foo<T: Default> for String {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^ associated item constraint not allowed here
|
help: declare the type parameter right after the `impl` keyword
|
LL - impl Foo<T: Default> for String {}
LL + impl<T: Default> Foo<T> for String {}
|
```
Before:
```
error[E0229]: associated item constraints are not allowed here
--> $DIR/impl-block-params-declared-in-wrong-spot-issue-113073.rs:3:10
|
LL | impl Foo<T: Default> for String {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^ associated item constraint not allowed here
|
help: declare the type parameter right after the `impl` keyword
|
LL | impl<T: Default> Foo<T> for String {}
| ++++++++++++ ~
```
When suggesting to rename an import with `as`, use a smaller span to
render the suggestion with a better format:
```
error[E0252]: the name `baz` is defined multiple times
--> $DIR/issue-25396.rs:4:5
|
LL | use foo::baz;
| -------- previous import of the module `baz` here
LL | use bar::baz;
| ^^^^^^^^ `baz` reimported here
|
= note: `baz` must be defined only once in the type namespace of this module
help: you can use `as` to change the binding name of the import
|
LL | use bar::baz as other_baz;
| ++++++++++++
```
Provided methods currently don't get type erasure performed on them
because they are not in an `impl` block. If we are instantiating a
method that is an associated item, but *not* in an impl block, treat it
as a provided method instead.
We were previously telling people to write what was already there, instead of removal.
```
error[E0229]: associated item constraints are not allowed here
--> $DIR/E0229.rs:13:25
|
LL | fn baz<I>(x: &<I as Foo<A = Bar>>::A) {}
| ^^^^^^^ associated item constraint not allowed here
|
help: consider removing this associated item binding
|
LL - fn baz<I>(x: &<I as Foo<A = Bar>>::A) {}
LL + fn baz<I>(x: &<I as Foo>::A) {}
|
```
In llvm/llvm-project@f0eb5587ce all
support for 3DNow! intrinsics and instructions were removed. Per the commit message
there, only AMD chips between 1998 and 2011 or so actually supported
these instructions, and they were effectively replaced by SSE which was
available on many more chips. I'd be very surprised if anyone had ever
used these from Rust.
