Ensure let stmt compound assignment removal suggestion respect codepoint boundaries
Previously we would try to issue a suggestion for `let x <op>= 1`, i.e.
a compound assignment within a `let` binding, to remove the `<op>`. The
suggestion code unfortunately incorrectly assumed that the `<op>` is an
exactly-1-byte ASCII character, but this assumption is incorrect because
we also recover Unicode-confusables like `➖=` as `-=`. In this example,
the suggestion code used a `+ BytePos(1)` to calculate the span of the
`<op>` codepoint that looks like `-` but the mult-byte Unicode
look-alike would cause the suggested removal span to be inside a
multi-byte codepoint boundary, triggering a codepoint boundary
assertion.
The fix is to use `SourceMap::start_point(token_span)` which properly accounts for codepoint boundaries.
Fixes#128845.
cc #128790
r? ````@fmease````
Use `SourceMap::end_point` instead of `- BytePos(1)` in arg removal suggestion
Previously, we tried to remove extra arg commas when providing extra arg removal suggestions. One of
the edge cases is having to account for an arg that has a closing delimiter `)` following it.
However, the previous suggestion code assumed that the delimiter is in fact exactly the 1-byte `)`
character. This assumption was proven incorrect, because we recover from Unicode-confusable
delimiters in the parser, which means that the ending delimiter could be a multi-byte codepoint
that looks *like* a `)`. Subtracing 1 byte could land us in the middle of a codepoint, triggering a
codepoint boundary assertion.
This is fixed by using `SourceMap::end_point` which properly accounts for codepoint boundaries.
Fixes#128717.
cc ````@fmease```` and #128790
use stable sort to sort multipart diagnostics
I think a stable sort should be used to sort the different parts of a multipart selection. The current unstable sort uses the text of the suggestion as a tie-breaker. That just doesn't seem right, and the order of the input is a better choice I think, because it gives the diagnostic author more control.
This came up when I was building a suggestion where
```rust
fn foo() {}
```
must be turned into an unsafe function, and an attribute must be added
```rust
#[target_feature(enable = "...")]
unsafe fn foo() {}
```
In this example, the two suggestions occur at the same position, but the order is extremely important: unsafe must come after the attribute. But the situation changes if there is a pub/pub(crate), and if the unsafe is already present. It just out that because of the suggestion text, there is no way for me to order the suggestions correctly.
This change probably should be tested, but are there tests of the diagnostics code itself in the tests?
r? ```@estebank```
Add `Steal::is_stolen()`
Writers of rustc drivers (such as myself) often encounter stealing issues. It is currently impossible to gracefully handle them. This PR adds a `Steal::is_stolen()` function for that purpose.
Set LLVM_ENABLE_ZSTD alongside LLVM_ENABLE_ZLIB so that --compress-debug-sections=zstd is an option.
Use static linking to avoid a new runtime dependency. Add an llvm.libzstd bootstrap option for LLVM
with zstd. Set it off by default except for the dist builder. Handle llvm-config --system-libs output
that contains static libraries.
Miscellaneous improvements to struct tail normalization
1. Make checks for foreign tails more accurate by normalizing the struct tail. I didn't write a test for this one.
2. Normalize when computing struct tail for `offset_of` for slice/str. This fixes the new solver only.
3. Normalizing when computing tails for disaligned reference check. This fixes both solvers.
r? lcnr
Previously we would try to issue a suggestion for `let x <op>= 1`, i.e.
a compound assignment within a `let` binding, to remove the `<op>`. The
suggestion code unfortunately incorrectly assumed that the `<op>` is an
exactly-1-byte ASCII character, but this assumption is incorrect because
we also recover Unicode-confusables like `➖=` as `-=`. In this example,
the suggestion code used a `+ BytePos(1)` to calculate the span of the
`<op>` codepoint that looks like `-` but the mult-byte Unicode
look-alike would cause the suggested removal span to be inside a
multi-byte codepoint boundary, triggering a codepoint boundary
assertion.
Issue: <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/128845>
Parser has error recovery for Unicode-confusables, which includes the
right parentheses `)`. If a multi-byte right parentheses look-alike
reaches the argument removal suggestion diagnostics, it would trigger an
assertion because the diagnostics used `- BytePos(1)` which can land
within a multi-byte codepoint.
This is fixed by using `SourceMap::end_point` to find the final right
delimiter codepoint, which correctly respects codepoint boundaries.
By splitting the `FnSig` within `TyKind::FnPtr` into `FnSigTys` and
`FnHeader`, which can be packed more efficiently. This reduces the size
of the hot `TyKind` type from 32 bytes to 24 bytes on 64-bit platforms.
This reduces peak memory usage by a few percent on some benchmarks. It
also reduces cache misses and page faults similarly, though this doesn't
translate to clear cycles or wall-time improvements on CI.
Don't inline tainted MIR bodies
Don't inline MIR bodies that are tainted, since they're not necessarily well-formed.
Fixes#128601 (I didn't add a new test, just copied one from the crashes, since they're the same root cause).
Fixes#122909.
Add comment that bors did not see pushed before it merged
In #128612, bors merged 470ada2de0 instead of 1e07c19.
This means it dropped a useful comment I added, and a stage rename that is more descriptive.
Don't implement `AsyncFn` for `FnDef`/`FnPtr` that wouldnt implement `Fn`
Due to unsafety, ABI, or the presence of target features, some `FnDef`/`FnPtr` types don't implement `Fn*`. Do the same for `AsyncFn*`.
Noticed this due to #128764, but this isn't really related to that ICE, which is fixed in #128792.
The existing code check for `where_bounds.is_empty()` twice when
it can be combined into one. Moreover, the refactored code reads
better and feels straightforward.
```
error[E0277]: the size for values of type `str` cannot be known at compilation time
--> $DIR/unsized-str-in-return-expr-arg-and-local.rs:15:9
|
LL | let x = *"";
| ^ doesn't have a size known at compile-time
|
= help: the trait `Sized` is not implemented for `str`
= note: all local variables must have a statically known size
= help: unsized locals are gated as an unstable feature
help: references are always `Sized`, even if they point to unsized data; consider not dereferencing the expression
|
LL - let x = *"";
LL + let x = "";
|
```
Update E0517 message to reflect RFC 2195.
E0517 occurs when a `#[repr(..)]` attribute is placed on an unsupported item. Currently, the explanation of the error implies that `#[repr(u*/i*)]` cannot be placed on fieldful enums, which is no longer the case since [RFC 2195](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2195) was [stabilized](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/60553), which allows placing `#[repr(u*/i*)]` and/or `#[repr(C)]` on fieldful enums to produce a defined layout.
This PR doesn't (currently) add a description of the semantics of placing `#[repr(u*/i*)]` on a fieldful enum to the error explanation, it just removes the claims/implications that it is not allowed.
Make `validate_mir` ensure the final MIR for all bodies
A lot of the crashes tests use `-Zpolymorphize` or `-Zdump-mir` for their side effect of computing the `optimized_mir` for all bodies, which will uncover bugs with late MIR passes like the inliner. I don't like having all these tests depend on `-Zpolymorphize` (or other hacky ways) for no reason, so this PR extends the `-Zvalidate-mir` flag to ensure `optimized_mir`/`mir_for_ctfe` for all body owners during the analysis phase.
Two thoughts:
1. This could be moved later in the compilation pipeline I guess? I don't really think it matters, though.
1. This could alternatively be expressed using a new flag, though I don't necessarily see much value in separating these.
For example, #128171 could have used this flag, in the `tests/ui/polymorphization/inline-incorrect-early-bound.rs`.
r? mir
Some `const { }` asserts for #128200
The correctness of code in #128200 relies on an array being sorted (so that it can be used in binary search later), which is currently enforced with `// tidy-alphabetical` (and characters being written in `\u{XXXX}` form), as well as lack of duplicate entries with conflicting keys, which is not currently enforced.
This PR changes it to using a `const{ }` assertion (and also checks for duplicate entries). Sadly, we cannot use the recently-stabilized `is_sorted_by_key` here, because it is not const (but it would not allow us to check for uniqueness anyways). Instead, let's write a manual loop.
Alternative approach (perfect hash function): #128463
r? `@ghost`
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #128520 (Skip over args when determining if async-closure's inner coroutine consumes its upvars)
- #128552 (Emit an error for invalid use of the `#[no_sanitize]` attribute)
- #128691 (Update `compiler-builtins` to 0.1.117)
- #128702 (Add -Zmetrics-dir=PATH to save diagnostic metadata to disk)
- #128797 (Fuchsia Test Runner: enable ffx repository server)
- #128798 (refactor(rustc_expand::mbe): Don't require full ExtCtxt when not necessary)
- #128800 (Add tracking issue to core-pattern-type)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
refactor(rustc_expand::mbe): Don't require full ExtCtxt when not necessary
Refactor `mbe::diagnostics::failed_to_match_macro()` to not require a full `ExtCtxt`, but only a `&ParseSess`. It hard-required the `ExtCtxt` only for a call to `cx.trace_macros_diag()`, which we move instead to the only call-site of the function.
Note: This could be a potential change in observed behavior, because a call to `cx.trace_macros_diag()` now always happens after `failed_to_match_macro()` was called, where before it was only called at the end of the main return path of the function. But since `trace_macros_diag()` "flushes" out any not-yet-reported errors, it should be ok to call it for all paths, since there shouldn't be any on the non-main paths I think. However, I don't know the rest of the codebase well enough to say that with 100% confidence, but `tests/ui` still pass, which gives at least some confidence in the change.
Also concretize the return type from `Box<dyn MacResult>` to `(Span, ErrorGuaranteed)`, because this function will _always_ return an error, and never any other kind of result.
Was part of #128605 and #128747, but is a standalone refactoring.
r? ``@petrochenkov``
Emit an error for invalid use of the `#[no_sanitize]` attribute
fixes#128487.
Currently, the use of the `#[no_sanitize]` attribute for Mod, Impl,... is incorrectly permitted. This PR will correct this issue by generating errors, and I've also added some UI test cases for it.
Referenced #128458. As far as I know, the `#[no_sanitize]` attribute can only be used with functions, so I changed that part to `Fn` and `Method` using `check_applied_to_fn_or_method`. However, I couldn't find explicit documentation on this, so I could be mistaken...
Skip over args when determining if async-closure's inner coroutine consumes its upvars
#125306 implements a strategy for when we have an `async move ||` async-closure that is inferred to be `async FnOnce`, it will force the inner coroutine to also be `move`, since we cannot borrow any upvars from the parent async-closure (since `FnOnce` is not lending):
8e86c95671/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/upvar.rs (L211-L229)
However, when this strategy was implemented, it reused the `ExprUseVisitor` data from visiting the whole coroutine, which includes additional statements due to `async`-specific argument desugaring:
8e86c95671/compiler/rustc_ast_lowering/src/item.rs (L1197-L1228)
Well, it turns out that we don't care about these argument desugaring parameters, because arguments to the async-closure are not the *async-closure*'s captures -- they exist for only one invocation of the closure, and they're always consumed by construction (see the argument desugaring above), so they will force the coroutine's inferred kind to `FnOnce`. (Unless they're `Copy`, because we never consider `Copy` types to be consumed):
8e86c95671/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/expr_use_visitor.rs (L60-L66)
However, since we *were* visiting these arg exprs, this resulted in us too-aggressively applying `move` to the inner coroutine, resulting in regressions. For example, this PR fixes#128516. Fascinatingly, the note above about how we never consume `Copy` types is why this only regressed when the argument types weren't all `Copy`.
I tried to leave some comments inline to make this more clear :)
