The version string is difficult to properly normalize out, and removing
it isn't a huge deal (the user can query version info easily through
`rustc --version` or `cargo --version`).
The normalization options were all non-ideal:
- Per-test version string normalization is nasty to maintain, and we
need to maintain `n` copies of it.
- Centralized compiletest normalization (with a directive opt-out) is
also not ideal, because `cfg(version(..))` tests can't have those
accidentally normalized out (and you'd have to remember to opt-out).
Simplify root goal API of solver a bit
Root goal API is more easily distinguished between proof tree and non-proof tree, rather than `eval_goal` vs `eval_goal_raw`.
r? lcnr
fix `-Zmin-function-alignment` on functions without attributes
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82232
related: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/142854
The minimum function alignment was skipped on functions without attributes (because the logic was in a loop that only runs if there is at least one attribute). The underlying reason we didn't catch this before is that in our testing we generally apply `#[no_mangle]` to functions that are tested. I've added a test now that deliberately has no attributes.
r? `@workingjubilee`
Add codegen timing section
And since we now start and end the sections also using separate functions, also add some light checking if we're generating the sections correctly.
I'm integrating `--timings` into Cargo, and I realized that the codegen timings would be quite useful for that. Frontend can be computed simply as `[start of compilation, start of codegen]` for now.
r? `@nnethercote`
the minimum function alignment was skipped on functions without attributes. That is because in our testing we generally apply `#[no_mangle]` to functions that are tested. I've added a test now that deliberately has no attributes
We modify rustc_ast_lowering to prevent all unsupported ABIs
from leaking through the HIR without being checked for target support.
Previously ad-hoc checking on various HIR items required making sure
we check every HIR item which could contain an `extern "{abi}"` string.
This is a losing proposition compared to gating the lowering itself.
As a consequence, unsupported ABI strings will now hard-error instead of
triggering the FCW `unsupported_fn_ptr_calling_conventions`.
This FCW was upgraded to warn in dependencies in Rust 1.87 which was
released on 2025 May 17, and it is now 2025 June, so it has become
active within a stable Rust version.
As we already had errored on these ABIs in most other positions, and
have warned for fn ptrs, this breakage has had reasonable foreshadowing.
However, this does cause errors for usages of `extern "{abi}"` that were
theoretically writeable within source but could not actually be applied
in any useful way by Rust programmers without either warning or error.
For instance, trait declarations without impls were never checked.
These are the exact kinds of leakages that this new approach prevents.
A deprecation cycle is not useful for these marginal cases as upon impl,
even default impls within traits, different HIR objects would be used.
Details of our HIR analysis meant that those objects did get checked.
We choose to error twice if an ABI is also barred by a feature gate
on the presumption that usage of a target-incorrect ABI is intentional.
Co-authored-by: Ralf Jung <post@ralfj.de>
Fix ICE on debug builds where lints are delayed on the crate root
r? ``@oli-obk``
Closesrust-lang/rust#142891
thanks to ``@JonathanBrouwer`` for finding it!
centralize `-Zmin-function-alignment` logic
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82232
discussed in: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/142824#discussion_r2160056244
Apply the `-Zmin-function-alignment` value to the alignment field of the function attributes when those are created, so that individual backends don't need to consider it.
The one exception right now is cranelift, because it can't yet set the alignment for individual functions, but it can (and does) set the global minimum function alignment.
cc ``@RalfJung`` I think this is an improvement regardless, is there anything else that should be done for miri?
Skip no-op drop glue
Since rust-lang/rust#122662 this no longer gets used in vtables, so we're safe to fully
drop generating functions from vtables. Those are eventually cleaned up
by LLVM, but it's wasteful to produce them in the first place.
This doesn't appear to be a significant win (and shows some slight regressions) but
seems like the right thing to do. At minimum it reduces noise in the LLVM IR we generate,
which seems like a good thing.
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#142458 (Merge unboxed trait object error suggestion into regular dyn incompat error)
- rust-lang/rust#142593 (Add a warning to LateContext::get_def_path)
- rust-lang/rust#142594 (Add DesugaringKind::FormatLiteral)
- rust-lang/rust#142740 (Clean-up `FnCtxt::is_destruct_assignment_desugaring`)
- rust-lang/rust#142780 (Port `#[must_use]` to new attribute parsing infrastructure)
- rust-lang/rust#142798 (Don't fail to parse a struct if a semicolon is used to separate fields)
- rust-lang/rust#142856 (Add a few inline directives in rustc_serialize.)
- rust-lang/rust#142868 (remove few allow(dead_code))
- rust-lang/rust#142874 (cranelift: fix target feature name typo: "fxsr")
- rust-lang/rust#142877 (Document why tidy checks if `eslint` is installed via `npm`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Add a few inline directives in rustc_serialize.
I see `debug_strict_add` and `debug_strict_sub` appearing in callgrind output. This bothers me. This PR should make them disappear.
Clean-up `FnCtxt::is_destruct_assignment_desugaring`
I noticed the docstring thing and fixed that; then I thought I'd rewrite the method using let-chains while I'm at it, since that seemed appropriate. But I don't feel too strongly about the second change, so let me know if I should remove it
Add DesugaringKind::FormatLiteral
Implements `DesugaringKind::FormatLiteral` to mark the FormatArgs desugaring of format literals. The main use for this is to stop yapping about about formatting parameters if we're not anywhere near a format literal. The other use case is to fix suggestions such as https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/141350. It might also be useful for new or existing diagnostics that check whether they're in a format-like macro.
cc `@xizheyin` `@fmease`
Merge unboxed trait object error suggestion into regular dyn incompat error
Another hir-walker removed from the well-formed queries. This error was always a duplicate of another, but it was able to provide more information because it could invoke `is_dyn_compatible` without worrying about cycle errors. That's also the reason we can't put the error directly into hir_ty_lowering when lowering a `dyn Trait` within an associated item signature. So instead I packed it into the error handling of wf obligation checking.
completely deduplicate `Visitor` and `MutVisitor`
r? oli-obk
This closesrust-lang/rust#127615.
### Discussion
> * Give every `MutVisitor::visit_*` method a corresponding `flat_map_*` method.
Not every AST node exists in a location where they can be mapped to multiple instances of themselves. Not every AST node exists in a location where they can be removed from existence (e.g. `filter_map_expr`). I don't think this is doable.
> * Give every `MutVisitor::visit_*` method a corresponding `Visitor` method and vice versa
The only three remaining method-level asymmetries after this PR are `visit_stmt` and `visit_nested_use_tree` (only on `Visitor`) and `visit_span` (only on `MutVisitor`).
`visit_stmt` doesn't seem applicable to `MutVisitor` because `walk_flat_map_stmt_kind` will ask `flat_map_item` / `filter_map_expr` to potentially turn a single `Stmt` to multiple based on what a visitor wants. So only using `flat_map_stmt` seems appropriate.
`visit_nested_use_tree` is used for `rustc_resolve` to track stuff. Not useful for `MutVisitor` for now.
`visit_span` is currently not used for `MutVisitor` already, it was just kept in case we want to revive rust-lang/rust#127241. cc `@cjgillot` maybe we could remove for now and re-insert later if we find a use-case? It does involve some extra effort to maintain.
* Remaining FIXMEs
`visit_lifetime` has an extra param for `Visitor` that's not in `MutVisitor`. This is again something only used by `rustc_resolve`. I think we can keep that symmetry for now.
All HIR attributes are outer
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/142649. Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/142759.
All HIR attributes, including parsed and not yet parsed, will now be rendered as outer attributes by `rustc_hir_pretty`. The original style of the corresponding AST attribute(s) is not relevant for pretty printing, only for diagnostics.
r? ````@jdonszelmann````
improve search graph docs, reset `encountered_overflow` between reruns
I think this shouldn't really matter for now. It will be more relevant for my current rework as we otherwise cannot partially reevaluate the root goal in case there has been overflow during the prervious iteration.
r? ````@BoxyUwU````
Port `#[rustc_pub_transparent]` to the new attribute system
Very similar to rust-lang/rust#142498.
This is a part of rust-lang/rust#131229, so
r? ````@jdonszelmann````
---
For reference, the `#[rustc_pub_transparent]` attribute was created by me back in rust-lang/rust#129487.
As mentioned back in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129487#discussion_r1730120385, this attribute does not check that it is applied to an ADT, because it checks that `#[repr(transparent)]` is also applied to the same item, which, in turn, should check for ADT.
Since 122662 this no longer gets used in vtables, so we're safe to fully
drop generating these empty functions. Those are eventually cleaned up
by LLVM, but it's wasteful to produce them in the first place.
This also adds a missing test for fn-ptr casts, which do still need to
generate no-op drop glue. It's possible a future optimization could
point all of those at the same drop glue (e.g., for *mut ()) rather than
for each separate type, but that would require extra work for CFI and
isn't particularly easy to do anyway.
Only traverse reachable blocks in JumpThreading.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131451
We only compute loop headers for reachable blocks. We shouldn't try to perform an opt on unreachable blocks anyway.
