Fix some confusing wording and improve slice-search-related docs
This adds more links between `contains` and `binary_search` because I do think they have some relevant connections. If your (big) slice happens to be sorted and you know it, surely you should be using `[3; 100].binary_search(&5).is_ok()` over `[3; 100].contains(&5)`?
This also fixes the confusing "searches this sorted X" wording which just sounds really weird because it doesn't know whether it's actually sorted. It should be but it may not be. The new wording should make it clearer that you will probably want to sort it and in the same sentence it also mentions the related function `contains`.
Similarly, this mentions `binary_search` on `contains`' docs.
This also fixes some other minor stuff and inconsistencies.
Mutex and Condvar are being replaced by more efficient implementations, which need thread parking themselves (see #93740). Therefore use the pthread synchronization primitives directly. Also, avoid allocating because the Parker struct is being placed in an Arc anyways.
Windows Command: Don't run batch files using verbatim paths
Fixes#95178
Note that the first commit does some minor refactoring (moving command line argument building to args.rs). The actual changes are in the second.
[test] Add test cases for untested functions for VecDeque
Added test cases of the following functions
- get
- get_mut
- swap
- reserve_exact
- try_reserve_exact
- try_reserve
- contains
- rotate_left
- rotate_right
- binary_search
- binary_search_by
- binary_search_by_key
Unstably constify `impl<I: Iterator> IntoIterator for I`
This constifies the default `IntoIterator` implementation under the `const_intoiterator_identity` feature.
Tracking Issue: #90603
No "weird" floats in const fn {from,to}_bits
I suspect this code is subtly incorrect and that we don't even e.g. use x87-style floats in CTFE, so I don't have to guard against that case. A future PR will be hopefully removing them from concern entirely, anyways. But at the moment I wanted to get this rolling because small questions like that one seem best answered by review.
r? `@oli-obk`
cc `@eddyb` `@thomcc`
Reduce allocations for path conversions on Windows
Previously, UTF-8 to UTF-16 Path conversions on Windows unnecessarily allocate twice, as described in #96297. This commit fixes that issue.
Improve Windows path prefix parsing
This PR fixes improves parsing of Windows path prefixes. `parse_prefix` now supports both types of separators on Windows (`/` and `\`).
Fixes: aa67016624 ("make memcmp return a value of c_int_width instead of i32")
Introduce c_num_definition to getting the cfg_if logic easier to maintain
Add newlines for easier code reading
Signed-off-by: Yonggang Luo <luoyonggang@gmail.com>
[fuchsia] Add implementation for `current_exe`
This implementation returns a best attempt at the current exe path. On
fuchsia, fdio will always use `argv[0]` as the process name and if it is
not set then an error will be returned. Because this is not guaranteed
to be the case, this implementation returns an error if `argv` does not
contain any elements.
remove_dir_all_recursive: treat ELOOP the same as ENOTDIR
On older Linux kernels (I tested on 4.4, corresponding to Ubuntu 16.04), opening a symlink using `O_DIRECTORY | O_NOFOLLOW` returns `ELOOP` instead of `ENOTDIR`. We should handle it the same, since a symlink is still not a directory and needs to be `unlink`ed.
Use sys::unix::locks::futex* on wasm+atomics.
This removes the wasm-specific lock implementations and instead re-uses the implementations from sys::unix.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/93740
cc ``@alexcrichton``
Improve AddrParseError description
The existing description was incorrect for socket addresses, and misleading: users would see “invalid IP address syntax” and suppose they were supposed to provide an IP address rather than a socket address.
I contemplated making it two variants (IP, socket), but realised we can do still better for the IPv4 and IPv6 types, so here it is as six.
I contemplated more precise error descriptions (e.g. “invalid IPv6 socket address syntax: expected a decimal scope ID after %”), but that’s a more invasive change, and probably not worthwhile anyway.
Making `BorrowedFd::borrow_raw` a const fn allows it to be used to
create a constant `BorrowedFd<'static>` holding constants such as
`AT_FDCWD`. This will allow [`rustix::fs::cwd`] to become a const fn.
For consistency, make similar changes to `BorrowedHandle::borrow_raw`
and `BorrowedSocket::borrow_raw`.
[`rustix::fs::cwd`]: https://docs.rs/rustix/latest/rustix/fs/fn.cwd.html
This implementation returns a best attempt at the current exe path. On
fuchsia, fdio will always use `argv[0]` as the process name and if it is
not set then an error will be returned. Because this is not guaranteed
to be the case, this implementation returns an error if `argv` does not
contain any elements.
`alloc`: make `vec!` unavailable under `no_global_oom_handling`
`alloc`: make `vec!` unavailable under `no_global_oom_handling`
The `vec!` macro has 3 rules, but two are not usable under
`no_global_oom_handling` builds of the standard library
(even with a zero size):
```rust
let _ = vec![42]; // Error: requires `exchange_malloc` lang_item.
let _ = vec![42; 0]; // Error: cannot find function `from_elem`.
```
Thus those two rules should not be available to begin with.
The remaining one, with an empty matcher, is just a shorthand for
`new()` and may not make as much sense to have alone, since the
idea behind `vec!` is to enable `Vec`s to be defined with the same
syntax as array expressions. Furthermore, the documentation can be
confusing since it shows the other rules.
Thus perhaps it is better and simpler to disable `vec!` entirely
under `no_global_oom_handling` environments, and let users call
`new()` instead:
```rust
let _: Vec<i32> = vec![];
let _: Vec<i32> = Vec::new();
```
Notwithstanding this, a `try_vec!` macro would be useful, such as
the one introduced in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95051.
If the shorthand for `new()` is deemed worth keeping on its own,
then it may be interesting to have a separate `vec!` macro with
a single rule and different, simpler documentation.
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
The existing description was incorrect for socket addresses, and
misleading: users would see “invalid IP address syntax” and suppose they
were supposed to provide an IP address rather than a socket address.
I contemplated making it two variants (IP, socket), but realised we can
do still better for the IPv4 and IPv6 types, so here it is as six.
I contemplated more precise error descriptions (e.g. “invalid IPv6
socket address syntax: expected a decimal scope ID after %”), but that’s
a more invasive change, and probably not worthwhile anyway.
