This doesn't handle `char` because it's a bit awkward to distinguish it
from u32 at this point in codegen.
Note that for some types (like `&Struct` and `&mut Struct`),
we already apply `dereferenceable`, which implies `noundef`,
so the IR does not change.
Stabilize `-Z instrument-coverage` as `-C instrument-coverage`
(Tracking issue for `instrument-coverage`: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/79121)
This PR stabilizes support for instrumentation-based code coverage, previously provided via the `-Z instrument-coverage` option. (Continue supporting `-Z instrument-coverage` for compatibility for now, but show a deprecation warning for it.)
Many, many people have tested this support, and there are numerous reports of it working as expected.
Move the documentation from the unstable book to stable rustc documentation. Update uses and documentation to use the `-C` option.
Addressing questions raised in the tracking issue:
> If/when stabilized, will the compiler flag be updated to -C instrument-coverage? (If so, the -Z variant could also be supported for some time, to ease migrations for existing users and scripts.)
This stabilization PR updates the option to `-C` and keeps the `-Z` variant to ease migration.
> The Rust coverage implementation depends on (and automatically turns on) -Z symbol-mangling-version=v0. Will stabilizing this feature depend on stabilizing v0 symbol-mangling first? If so, what is the current status and timeline?
This stabilization PR depends on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/90128 , which stabilizes `-C symbol-mangling-version=v0` (but does not change the default symbol-mangling-version).
> The Rust coverage implementation implements the latest version of LLVM's Coverage Mapping Format (version 4), which forces a dependency on LLVM 11 or later. A compiler error is generated if attempting to compile with coverage, and using an older version of LLVM.
Given that LLVM 13 has now been released, requiring LLVM 11 for coverage support seems like a reasonable requirement. If people don't have at least LLVM 11, nothing else breaks; they just can't use coverage support. Given that coverage support currently requires a nightly compiler and LLVM 11 or newer, allowing it on a stable compiler built with LLVM 11 or newer seems like an improvement.
The [tracking issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/79121) and the [issue label A-code-coverage](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/A-code-coverage) link to a few open issues related to `instrument-coverage`, but none of them seem like showstoppers. All of them seem like improvements and refinements we can make after stabilization.
The original `-Z instrument-coverage` support went through a compiler-team MCP at https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/278 . Based on that, `@pnkfelix` suggested that this needed a stabilization PR and a compiler-team FCP.
Fix ret > 1 bound if shadowed by const
Prior to a change, it would only look at types in bounds. When it started looking for consts,
shadowing type variables with a const would cause an ICE, so now defer looking at consts only if
there are no types present.
cc ``````@compiler-errors``````
Should Fix#93553
Windows: Disable LLVM crash dialog boxes.
This disables the crash dialog box on Windows. When LLVM hits an assertion, it will open a dialog box with Abort/Retry/Ignore. This is annoying on CI because CI will just hang until it times out (which can take hours).
Instead of opening a dialog box, it will print a message like this:
```
Assertion failed: isa<X>(Val) && "cast<Ty>() argument of incompatible type!", file D:\Proj\rust\rust\src\llvm-project\llvm\include\llvm/Support/Casting.h, line 255
```
Closes#92829
Prior to a change, it would only look at types in bounds. When it started looking for consts,
shadowing type variables with a const would cause an ICE, so now defer looking at consts only if
there are no types present.
The "CI" environment var isn't universal (for example, I think Azure
uses TF_BUILD). However, we are mostly concerned with rust-lang/rust's
own CI which currently is GitHub Actions which does set "CI". And I
think most other providers use "CI" as well.
Correct incorrect description of preorder traversals
The internal documentation for the `Preorder` type gave an incorrect description (the description is not even correct for the example provided, since C is visited after one of its successors). This corrects the description, and adds in a sentence explaining more precisely how the traversals are performed.
Make rustc use `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` by default
Compiler panics should be rare - when they do occur, we want the report
filed by the user to contain as much information as possible. This is
especially important when the panic is due to an incremental compilation
bug, since we may not have enough information to reproduce it.
This PR sets `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` inside `rustc` if the user has not
explicitly set `RUST_BACKTRACE`. This is more verbose than
`RUST_BACKTRACE=1`, but this may make it easier to debug incremental
compilation issues. Users who find this too verbose can still manually
set `RUST_BACKTRACE` before invoking the compiler.
This only affects `rustc` (and any tool using `rustc_driver::install_ice_hook`).
It does *not* affect any user crates or the standard library -
backtraces will continue to be off by default in any application
*compiled* by rustc.
Factor convenience functions out of main printer implementation
The pretty printer in rustc_ast_pretty has a section of methods commented "Convenience functions to talk to the printer". This PR pulls those out to a separate module. This leaves pp.rs with only the minimal API that is core to the pretty printing algorithm.
I found this separation to be helpful in https://github.com/dtolnay/prettyplease because it makes clear when changes are adding some fundamental new capability to the pretty printer algorithm vs just making it more convenient to call some already existing functionality.
rustdoc: Fix ICE report
The ICE report in rustdoc was confusing because it was returning an argument parse error:
```
thread 'rustc' panicked at 'aborting due to `-Z treat-err-as-bug=1`', compiler/rustc_errors/src/lib.rs:1212:27
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
error: internal compiler error: unexpected panic
error: Unrecognized option: 'crate-version'
```
This is because the ICE reporter was trying to parse the arguments as rustc, not rustdoc. Since an argument error is a fatal error, it was early-exiting with the argument error due to unwinding.
This changes it to be a more primitive scan of the arguments. The arguments being checked are pretty simple, and only have a small handful of forms that are easy to check for.
It now looks like this:
```
thread 'rustc' panicked at 'aborting due to `-Z treat-err-as-bug=1`', compiler/rustc_errors/src/lib.rs:1212:27
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
error: internal compiler error: unexpected panic
note: the compiler unexpectedly panicked. this is a bug.
note: we would appreciate a bug report: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/new?labels=C-bug%2C+I-ICE%2C+T-compiler&template=ice.md
note: rustc 1.59.0-dev running on x86_64-apple-darwin
note: compiler flags: --crate-type lib -Z treat-err-as-bug
note: some of the compiler flags provided by cargo are hidden
query stack during panic:
end of query stack
```
It still says `rustc`, but I can live with that.
Temporary fix for the layout of aligned enums
Fix for the issue #92464
~~I was after this issue for quite some time now, I have a temporary fix for it.
I think the current problem is [here](e75f96763f/compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/layout.rs (L1305-L1310)) created `tag` value might be wrong, because when I checked `min` and `max` values it's always between 0..1, which results in wrong size comparison in a few lines down below.
I think `min` and `max` values don't take `#[repr(aligned(8))]` into consideration and just act from base values assigned inside the enum. If what I am saying is true, aligned enums were created with the wrong layout for some time.~~
~~As stated in the title this is only a temporary fix and I think this needs further investigation, if someone wants to mentor it I would like to work on that too.~~ 😸
**Edit: Weird some tests fail now going to close this for now...**
**Edit2: I made it work again.**
I think I figured out the main problem of the issue, layout types of aligned enums with custom discriminant types were not handled, which resulted in confusing(such as this issue) behavior down the line, this is a kinda hacky fix for the issue.
Compress amount of hashed bytes for `isize` values in StableHasher
This is another attempt to land https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/92103, this time hopefully with a correct implementation w.r.t. stable hashing guarantees. The previous PR was [reverted](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93014) because it could produce the [same hash](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/92103#issuecomment-1014625442) for different values even in quite simple situations. I have since added a basic [test](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93193) that should guard against that situation, I also added a new test in this PR, specialised for this optimization.
## Why this optimization helps
Since the original PR, I have tried to analyze why this optimization even helps (and why it especially helps for `clap`). I found that the vast majority of stable-hashing `i64` actually comes from hashing `isize` (which is converted to `i64` in the stable hasher). I only found a single place where is this datatype used directly in the compiler, and this place has also been showing up in traces that I used to find out when is `isize` being hashed. This place is `rustc_span::FileName::DocTest`, however, I suppose that isizes also come from other places, but they might not be so easy to find (there were some other entries in the trace). `clap` hashes about 8.5 million `isize`s, and all of them fit into a single byte, which is why this optimization has helped it [quite a lot](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/92103#issuecomment-1005711861).
Now, I'm not sure if special casing `isize` is the correct solution here, maybe something could be done with that `isize` inside `DocTest` or in other places, but that's for another discussion I suppose. In this PR, instead of hardcoding a special case inside `SipHasher128`, I instead put it into `StableHasher`, and only used it for `isize` (I tested that for `i64` it doesn't help, or at least not for `clap` and other few benchmarks that I was testing).
## New approach
Since the most common case is a single byte, I added a fast path for hashing `isize` values which positive value fits within a single byte, and a cold path for the rest of the values.
To avoid the previous correctness problem, we need to make sure that each unique `isize` value will produce a unique hash stream to the hasher. By hash stream I mean a sequence of bytes that will be hashed (a different sequence should produce a different hash, but that is of course not guaranteed).
We have to distinguish different values that produce the same bit pattern when we combine them. For example, if we just simply skipped the leading zero bytes for values that fit within a single byte, `(0xFF, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF)` and `(0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, 0xFF)` would send the same hash stream to the hasher, which must not happen.
To avoid this situation, values `[0, 0xFE]` are hashed as a single byte. When we hash a larger (treating `isize` as `u64`) value, we first hash an additional byte `0xFF`. Since `0xFF` cannot occur when we apply the single byte optimization, we guarantee that the hash streams will be unique when hashing two values `(a, b)` and `(b, a)` if `a != b`:
1) When both `a` and `b` are within `[0, 0xFE]`, their hash streams will be different.
2) When neither `a` and `b` are within `[0, 0xFE]`, their hash streams will be different.
3) When `a` is within `[0, 0xFE]` and `b` isn't, when we hash `(a, b)`, the hash stream will definitely not begin with `0xFF`. When we hash `(b, a)`, the hash stream will definitely begin with `0xFF`. Therefore the hash streams will be different.
r? `@the8472`
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #92528 (Make `Fingerprint::combine_commutative` associative)
- #93221 ([borrowck] Fix help on mutating &self in async fns)
- #93542 (Prevent lifetime elision in type alias)
- #93546 (Validate that values in switch int terminator are unique)
- #93571 (better suggestion for duplicated `where` clause)
- #93574 (don't suggest adding `let` due to bad assignment expressions inside of `while` loop)
- #93590 (More let_else adoptions)
- #93592 (Remove unused dep from rustc_arena)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
