Give more details in `Display` for `hir::Target`
Made because I was making a code change and got a very confusing "should be applied to a method, not a method" error.
```
error[E0718]: `into_try_type` language item must be applied to a method
--> library\core\src\ops\try_trait.rs:352:32
|
352 | #[cfg_attr(not(bootstrap), lang = "into_try_type")]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ attribute should be applied to a method, not a method
```
With this change the error is more actionable
```
error[E0718]: `into_try_type` language item must be applied to a required trait method
--> library\core\src\ops\try_trait.rs:352:32
|
352 | #[cfg_attr(not(bootstrap), lang = "into_try_type")]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ attribute should be applied to a required trait method, not a provided trait method
```
Made because I was making a code change and got a very confusing "should be applied to a method, not a method" error.
```
error[E0718]: `into_try_type` language item must be applied to a method
--> library\core\src\ops\try_trait.rs:352:32
|
352 | #[cfg_attr(not(bootstrap), lang = "into_try_type")]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ attribute should be applied to a method, not a method
```
Always evaluate all cfg predicate in all() and any()
This pull-request adjust the handling of the `all()` and `any()` to always evaluate every cfg predicate because not doing so result in accepting incorrect `cfg`:
```rust
#[cfg(any(unix, foo::bar))] // Should error on foo::bar, but does not on unix platform (but does on non unix platform)
fn foo1() {}
#[cfg(all(foo, foo::bar))] // Should error on foo::bar, but does not
fn foo2() {}
#[cfg(all(foo::bar, foo))] // Correctly error on foo::bar
fn foo3() {}
#[cfg(any(foo::bar, foo))] // Correctly error on foo::bar
fn foo4() {}
```
This pull-request take the side to directly turn it into a hard error instead of having a future incompatibility lint because the combination to get this incorrect behavior is unusual and highly probable that some code have this without noticing.
A [search](https://cs.github.com/?scopeName=All+repos&scope=&q=lang%3Arust+%2Fany%5C%28%5Ba-zA-Z%5D%2C+%5Ba-zA-Z%5D%2B%3A%3A%5Ba-zA-Z%5D%2B%2F) on Github reveal no such instance nevertheless a Crater run should probably be done before merging this.
This was discover in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94175 when trying to lint on the second predicate. Also note that this seems to have being introduce with Rust 1.27.0: https://rust.godbolt.org/z/KnfqKv15f.
r? `@petrochenkov`
It currently has no state, just the three methods `parse_tt`,
`parse_tt_inner`, and `bb_items_ambiguity_error`.
This commit is large but trivial, and mostly consists of changes to the
indentation of those methods. Subsequent commits will do more.
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #95013 (Update browser-ui-test version to 0.8.2)
- #95039 (Make negative coherence work when there's impl negative on super predicates)
- #95047 (Refactor: remove an unnecessary pattern for ignoring all parts)
- #95048 (update Miri)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Implement -Z oom=panic
This PR removes the `#[rustc_allocator_nounwind]` attribute on `alloc_error_handler` which allows it to unwind with a panic instead of always aborting. This is then used to implement `-Z oom=panic` as per RFC 2116 (tracking issue #43596).
Perf and binary size tests show negligible impact.
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #91133 (Improve `unsafe` diagnostic)
- #93222 (Make ErrorReported impossible to construct outside `rustc_errors`)
- #93745 (Stabilize ADX target feature)
- #94309 ([generator_interior] Be more precise with scopes of borrowed places)
- #94698 (Remove redundant code from copy-suggestions)
- #94731 (Suggest adding `{ .. }` around a const function call with arguments)
- #94960 (Fix many spelling mistakes)
- #94982 (Add deprecated_safe feature gate and attribute, cc #94978)
- #94997 (debuginfo: Fix ICE when generating name for type that produces a layout error.)
- #95000 (Fixed wrong type name in comment)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Remove redundant code from copy-suggestions
Follow up to #94375, just remove some code that is not necessary anymore. This may make the perf of such suggestions a little bit worse, but I don't think this is significant.
r? `@estebank`
[generator_interior] Be more precise with scopes of borrowed places
Previously the generator interior type checking analysis would use the nearest temporary scope as the scope of a borrowed value. This ends up being overly broad for cases such as:
```rust
fn status(_client_status: &Client) -> i16 {
200
}
fn main() {
let client = Client;
let g = move || match status(&client) {
_status => yield,
};
assert_send(g);
}
```
In this case, the borrow `&client` could be considered in scope for the entirety of the `match` expression, meaning it would be viewed as live across the `yield`, therefore making the generator not `Send`.
In most cases, we want to use the enclosing expression as the scope for a borrowed value which will be less than or equal to the nearest temporary scope. This PR changes the analysis to use the enclosing expression as the scope for most borrows, with the exception of borrowed RValues which are true temporary values that should have the temporary scope. There's one further exception where borrows of a copy such as happens in autoref cases also should be ignored despite being RValues.
Joint work with `@nikomatsakis`
Fixes#57017
r? `@tmandry`
Stabilize ADX target feature
This is a continuation of #60109, which noted that while the ADX intrinsics were stabilized, the corresponding target feature never was.
This PR follows the same general structure and stabilizes the ADX target feature.
See also https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44839 - tracking issue for target feature
Make ErrorReported impossible to construct outside `rustc_errors`
There are a few places were we have to construct it, though, and a few
places that are more invasive to change. To do this, we create a
constructor with a long obvious name.
cc #69426 `@varkor` `@eddyb` `@estebank`
I actually didn't see that I was assigned to this issue until now...
