Since `WaitTimeoutResult` is poison-agnostic, we want to use the same
type for both variants of `Condvar`.
Signed-off-by: Connor Tsui <connor.tsui20@gmail.com>
Adds tests for the `nonpoison::Mutex` variant by using a macro to
duplicate the existing `poison` tests.
Note that all of the tests here are adapted from the existing `poison`
tests.
Also steals the `test_mutex_arc_condvar` test from `mutex.rs`.
Signed-off-by: Connor Tsui <connor.tsui20@gmail.com>
Adds the equivalent `nonpoison` types to the `poison::condvar` module.
These types and implementations are gated under the `nonpoison_condvar`
feature gate.
Signed-off-by: Connor Tsui <connor.tsui20@gmail.com>
Fixes an issue where if the underlying `Once` panics because it is
poisoned, the panic displays the wrong message.
Signed-off-by: Connor Tsui <connor.tsui20@gmail.com>
stdlib: Replace typedef -> type alias in doc comment
'typedef' is jargon from C and C++.
Since the Rust reference uses the term [type alias](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/items/type-aliases.html),
this patch changes the doc comment in io/error.rs
to also use 'type alias'.
Clarify EOF handling for `BufRead::skip_until`
This aligns `BufRead::skip_until`'s description more with `BufRead::read_until` in terms of how it handles EOF and extends the doctest to include this behavior.
bufreader::Buffer::backshift: don't move the uninit bytes
previous code was perfectly sound because of MaybeUninit, but it did waste cycles on copying memory that is known to be uninitialized.
Rust build fails on OpenBSD after using file_lock feature
PR 130999 added the file_lock feature, but doesn't included OpenBSD in the supported targets (Tier 3 platform), leading to a compilation error ("try_lock() not supported").
Cc `@cberner`
Related to rust-lang/rust#130999
Remove the `From` derive macro from prelude
The new `#[derive(From)]` functionality (implemented in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/144922) caused name resolution ambiguity issues (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/145524). The reproducer looks e.g. like this:
```rust
mod foo {
pub use derive_more::From;
}
use foo::*;
#[derive(From)] // ERROR: `From` is ambiguous
struct S(u32);
```
It's pretty unfortunate that it works like this, but I guess that there's not much to be done here, and we'll have to wait for the next edition to put the `From` macro into the prelude. That will probably require https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/139493 to land.
I created a new module in core (and re-exported it in std) called `from`, where I re-exported the `From` macro. I *think* that since this is a new module, it should not have the same backwards incompatibility issue.
Happy to hear suggestions about the naming - maybe it would make sense as `core::macros::from::From`? But we already had a precedent in the `core::assert_matches` module, so I just followed suit.
Fixes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/145524
r? ``@petrochenkov``
[RTE-513] Ignore sleep_until test on SGX
rust-lang/rust#141829 added a test for `sleep_until`: it checks whether its specification holds:
> Puts the current thread to sleep until the specified deadline has passed.
but in SGX there's no secure time source. There's only the ability to request the `insecure_time` from outside of the enclave through a [usercall](https://github.com/fortanix/rust-sgx/blob/master/intel-sgx/fortanix-sgx-abi/src/lib.rs#L590-L592) and the ability to [wait](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/library/std/src/sys/pal/sgx/abi/usercalls/mod.rs#L173-L179) for a certain event or timeout. But both are under the control of an attacker; users should not depend on the accuracy nor correctness of this time. We try to even enforce this by adding a +/-10% time interval to wait usercalls.
The current `thread::sleep_until` implementation uses this `wait` usercall. When a negative randomization interval is added to the timeout passed in `wait`, the test fails. As users should not rely on the correctness of any time inside the enclave, it should be considered an incorrect test on SGX. This PR ignores this test.
`impl PartialEq<{str,String}> for {Path,PathBuf}`
This is a revival of #105877
Comparison of paths and strings is expected to be possible and needed e.g. in tests. This change adds the impls os `PartialEq` between strings and paths, both owned and unsized, in both directions.
ACP: https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/151
library: Migrate from `cfg_if` to `cfg_select`
Migrate the standard library from using the external `cfg_if` crate to using the now-built-in `cfg_select` macro.
This does not yet eliminate the dependency from `library/std/Cargo.toml`, because while the standard library itself no longer uses `cfg_if`, it also incorporates the `backtrace` crate, which does.
Migration assisted by the following vim command (after selecting the full `cfg_if!` invocation):
```
'<,'>s/\(cfg_if::\)\?cfg_if/cfg_select/ | '<,'>s/^\( *\)} else {/\1}\r\1_ => {/c | '<,'>s/^\( *\)} else if #\[cfg(\(.*\))\] /\1}\r\1\2 => /e | '<,'>s/if #\[cfg(\(.*\))\] {/\1 => {/e
```
This is imperfect, but substantially accelerated the process. This prompts for confirmation on the `} else {` since that can also appear inside one of the arms. This also requires manual intervention to handle any multi-line conditions.
PR 130999 added the file_lock feature, but doesn't included OpenBSD in the supported targets (Tier 3 platform), leading to a compilation error ("try_lock() not supported").
Migrate the standard library from using the external `cfg_if` crate to
using the now-built-in `cfg_select` macro.
This does not yet eliminate the dependency from
`library/std/Cargo.toml`, because while the standard library itself no
longer uses `cfg_if`, it also incorporates the `backtrace` crate, which
does.
Migration assisted by the following vim command (after selecting the
full `cfg_if!` invocation):
```
'<,'>s/\(cfg_if::\)\?cfg_if/cfg_select/ | '<,'>s/^\( *\)} else {/\1}\r\1_ => {/c | '<,'>s/^\( *\)} else if #\[cfg(\(.*\))\] /\1}\r\1\2 => /e | '<,'>s/if #\[cfg(\(.*\))\] {/\1 => {/e
```
This is imperfect, but substantially accelerated the process. This
prompts for confirmation on the `} else {` since that can also appear
inside one of the arms. This also requires manual intervention to handle
any multi-line conditions.
std: thread: Return error if setting thread stack size fails
Currently, when setting the thread stack size fails, it would be rounded up to the nearest multiple of the page size and the code asserts that the next call to `pthread_attr_setstacksize` succeeds.
This may be true for glibc, but it isn't true for musl, which not only enforces a minimum stack size, but also a maximum stack size of `usize::MAX / 4 - PTHREAD_STACK_MIN` [1], triggering the assert rather than erroring gracefully.
There isn't any way to handle this properly other than bailing out and letting the user know it didn't succeed.
[1]: https://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/src/thread/pthread_attr_setstacksize.c#n5
Resolve the prelude import in `build_reduced_graph`
This pr tries to resolve the prelude import at the `build_reduced_graph` stage.
Part of batched import resolution in rust-lang/rust#145108 (cherry picked commit) and maybe needed for rust-lang/rust#139493.
r? petrochenkov
