Tweak errors coming from `for`-loop, `?` and `.await` desugaring
* Suggest removal of `.await` on non-`Future` expression
* Keep track of obligations introduced by desugaring
* Remove span pointing at method for obligation errors coming from desugaring
* Point at called local sync `fn` and suggest making it `async`
```
error[E0277]: `()` is not a future
--> $DIR/unnecessary-await.rs:9:10
|
LL | boo().await;
| -----^^^^^^ `()` is not a future
| |
| this call returns `()`
|
= help: the trait `Future` is not implemented for `()`
help: do not `.await` the expression
|
LL - boo().await;
LL + boo();
|
help: alternatively, consider making `fn boo` asynchronous
|
LL | async fn boo () {}
| +++++
```
Fix#66731.
Stabilize asm! and global_asm!
Tracking issue: #72016
It's been almost 2 years since the original [RFC](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2850) was posted and we're finally ready to stabilize this feature!
The main changes in this PR are:
- Removing `asm!` and `global_asm!` from the prelude as per the decision in #87228.
- Stabilizing the `asm` and `global_asm` features.
- Removing the unstable book pages for `asm` and `global_asm`. The contents are moved to the [reference](https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1105) and [rust by example](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-by-example/pull/1483).
- All links to these pages have been removed to satisfy the link checker. In a later PR these will be replaced with links to the reference or rust by example.
- Removing the automatic suggestion for using `llvm_asm!` instead of `asm!` if you're still using the old syntax, since it doesn't work anymore with `asm!` no longer being in the prelude. This only affects code that predates the old LLVM-style `asm!` being renamed to `llvm_asm!`.
- Updating `stdarch` and `compiler-builtins`.
- Updating all the tests.
r? `@joshtriplett`
Looser check for overflowing_binary_op
Fix for issue #91636 tight check resulted in ICE, this makes the check a little looser. It seems `eq` allows comparing of `supertype` and `subtype` if `lhs = supertype` and `rhs = subtype` but not vice versa, is this intended behavior ?
Return an error when `eval_rvalue_with_identities` fails
Previously some code paths would fail to evaluate the rvalue, while
incorrectly indicating success with `Ok`. As a result the previous value
of lhs could have been incorrectly const propagated.
Fixes#91725.
r? `@oli-obk`
Recover on invalid operators `<>` and `<=>`
Thanks to #89871 for showing me how to do this.
Next, I think it'd be nice to recover on `<=>` too, like #89871 intended, if this even works.
Previously some code paths would fail to evaluate the rvalue, while
incorrectly indicating success with `Ok`. As a result the previous value
of lhs could have been incorrectly const propagated.
This optimization pass previously made excessive assumptions as to the nature of
the blocks being optimized. We remove those assumptions and make sure to
rigorously justify all changes that are made to the MIR. Details can be found
in the file.
Suggest to specify a target triple when lang item is missing
It is very common for newbies to embedded to hit this confusing error when forgetting to specify the target.
Source: me googling this error many times.
## Possible changes
* We could possibly restrict the note+help to only be included on eh_personality lang item if that helped reduce false positives, but its also possible doing so would just increase false negatives
* Open to any suggestions on rewriting the messages
* We could possibly remove the `.cargo/config` alternative to avoid the message getting too noisy but I think its valuable to have as its the correct approach for most embedded projects so that `cargo build` just works.
r? rust-lang/diagnostics
manually implement `Hash` for `DefId`
This might speed up hashing for hashers that can work on individual u64s. Just as an experiment, suggested in a reddit thread on `FxHasher`. cc `@nnethercote`
Note that this should not be merged as is without cfg-ing the code path for 64 bits.
This crate actually had a typo `'ctx` in one of its functions:
```diff
-pub fn same_type_modulo_infer(a: Ty<'tcx>, b: Ty<'ctx>) -> bool {
+pub fn same_type_modulo_infer<'tcx>(a: Ty<'tcx>, b: Ty<'tcx>) -> bool {
```
