The initial wording does not make sense due to an extra 'to'.
There are two potential candidates we can change this to:
- 'you can import it into scope'
- 'to import it into scope'
In keeping the changes minimal, we choose the first, as this is more in line with the grammar of the extended candidates help message.
Fix name resolution in lexical scopes
Currently, `resolve_item_in_lexical_scope` does not check the "ribs" (type parameters and local variables). This can allow items that should be shadowed by type parameters to be named.
For example,
```rust
struct T { i: i32 }
fn f<T>() {
let t = T { i: 0 }; // This use of `T` resolves to the struct, not the type parameter
}
mod Foo {
pub fn f() {}
}
fn g<Foo>() {
Foo::f(); // This use of `Foo` resolves to the module, not the type parameter
}
```
This PR changes `resolve_item_in_lexical_scope` so that it fails when the item is shadowed by a rib (fixes#32120).
This is a [breaking-change], but it looks unlikely to cause breakage in practice.
r? @nikomatsakis
This PR privacy checks paths as they are resolved instead of in `librustc_privacy` (fixes#12334 and fixes#31779). This removes the need for the `LastPrivate` system introduced in PR #9735, the limitations of which cause #31779.
This PR also reports privacy violations in paths to intra- and inter-crate items the same way -- it always reports the first inaccessible segment of the path.
Since it fixes#31779, this is a [breaking-change]. For example, the following code would break:
```rust
mod foo {
pub use foo::bar::S;
mod bar { // `bar` should be private to `foo`
pub struct S;
}
}
impl foo::S {
fn f() {}
}
fn main() {
foo::bar::S::f(); // This is now a privacy error
}
```
r? @alexcrichton
This fixes a bug (#31845) introduced in #31105 in which lexical scopes contain items from all anonymous module ancestors, even if the path to the anonymous module includes a normal module:
```rust
fn f() {
fn g() {}
mod foo {
fn h() {
g(); // This erroneously resolves on nightly
}
}
}
```
This is a [breaking-change] on nightly but not on stable or beta.
r? @nikomatsakis
Now that #31461 is merged, a failing resolution can never become indeterminate or succeed, so we no longer have to keep trying to resolve failing import directives.
r? @nrc
This commit adds functionality that allows the name resolution pass
to search for entities (traits/types/enums/structs) by name, in
order to show recommendations along with the errors.
For now, only E0405 and E0412 have suggestions attached, as per the
request in bug #21221, but it's likely other errors can also benefit
from the ability to generate suggestions.
This commit adds functionality that allows the name resolution pass
to search for entities (traits/types/enums/structs) by name, in
order to show recommendations along with the errors.
For now, only E0405 and E0412 have suggestions attached, as per the
request in bug #21221, but it's likely other errors can also benefit
from the ability to generate suggestions.
Refactor away resolve_name_in_module in resolve_imports.rs
Rewrite and improve the core name resolution procedure in NameResolution::result and Module::resolve_name
Refactor the duplicate checking code into NameResolution::try_define
