When encountering `pub ident`, attempt to identify the code that comes
afterwards, wether it is a brace block (assume it is a struct), a paren
list followed by a colon (assume struct) or a paren list followed by a
block (assume a fn). Consume those blocks to avoid any further parser
errors and return a `Placeholder` item in order to allow the parser to
continue. In the case of unenclosed blocks, the behavior is the same as
it is currently: no further errors are processed.
Fix help for duplicated names: `extern crate (...) as (...)`
On the case of duplicated names caused by an `extern crate` statement
with a rename, don't include the inline suggestion, instead using a span
label with only the text to avoid incorrect rust code output.
Fix#45829.
Detect `=` -> `:` typo in let bindings
When encountering a let binding type error, attempt to parse as
initializer instead. If successful, it is likely just a typo:
```rust
fn main() {
let x: Vec::with_capacity(10);
}
```
```
error: expected type, found `10`
--> file.rs:3:31
|
3 | let x: Vec::with_capacity(10, 20);
| -- ^^
| ||
| |help: did you mean assign here?: `=`
| while parsing the type for `x`
```
Fix#43703.
On the case of duplicated names caused by an `extern crate` statement
with a rename, don't include the inline suggestion, instead using a span
label with only the text to avoid incorrect rust code output.
When encountering a let binding type error, attempt to parse as
initializer instead. If successful, it is likely just a typo:
```rust
fn main() {
let x: Vec::with_capacity(10);
}
```
```
error: expected type, found `10`
--> file.rs:3:31
|
3 | let x: Vec::with_capacity(10, 20);
| -- ^^
| ||
| |help: did you mean assign here?: `=`
| while parsing the type for `x`
```
[Syntax] Implement auto trait syntax
Implements `auto trait Send {}` as a substitute for `trait Send {} impl Send for .. {}`.
See the [internals thread](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/pre-rfc-renaming-oibits-and-changing-their-declaration-syntax/3086) for motivation. Part of #13231.
The first commit is just a rename moving from "default trait" to "auto trait". The rest is parser->AST->HIR work and making it the same as the current syntax for everything below HIR. It's under the `optin_builtin_traits` feature gate.
When can we remove the old syntax? Do we need to wait for a new `stage0`? We also need to formally decide for the new form (even if the keyword is not settled yet).
Observations:
- If you `auto trait Auto {}` and then `impl Auto for .. {}` that's accepted even if it's redundant.
- The new syntax is simpler internally which will allow for a net removal of code, for example well-formedness checks are effectively moved to the parser.
- Rustfmt and clippy are broken, need to fix those.
- Rustdoc just ignores it for now.
ping @petrochenkov @nikomatsakis
DefaultImpl is a highly confusing name for what we now call auto impls,
as in `impl Send for ..`. The name auto impl is not formally decided
but for sanity anything is better than `DefaultImpl` which refers
neither to `default impl` nor to `impl Default`.
Use 128 bit instead of Symbol for crate disambiguator
As discussed on gitter, this changes `crate_disambiguator` from Strings to what they are represented as, a 128 bit number.
There's also one bit I think also needs to change, but wasn't 100% sure how: [create_root_def](f338dba297/src/librustc/hir/map/definitions.rs (L468-L482)). Should I change `DefKey::root_parent_stable_hash` to accept `Fingerprint` as crate_disambiguator to quickly combine the hash of `crate_name` with the new 128 bit hash instead of a string for a disambiguator?
r? @michaelwoerister
EDIT: Are those 3 tests `mir-opt` failing, because the hash is different, because we calculate it a little bit differently (storing directly instead of hashing the hex-string representation)? Should it be updated like in #45319?
Move Generics from MethodSig to TraitItem and ImplItem
As part of `rust-impl-period/WG-compiler-traits`, we want to "lift" `Generics` from `MethodSig` into `TraitItem` and `ImplItem`. This is in preparation for adding associated type generics. (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44265#issuecomment-331172238)
Currently this change is only made in the AST. In the future, it may also impact the HIR. (Still discussing)
To understand this PR, it's probably best to start from the changes to `ast.rs` and then work your way to the other files to understand the far reaching effects of this change.
r? @nikomatsakis
don't suggest placing `use` statements into expanded code
r? @nrc
fixes#44210
```rust
#[derive(Debug)]
struct Foo;
type X = Path;
```
will try to place `use std::path::Path;` between `#[derive(Debug)]` and `struct Foo;`
I am not sure how to obtain a span before the first attribute, because derive attributes are removed during expansion.
It would be trivial to detect this case and place the `use` after the item, but that would be somewhat weird I think.
This'll allow us to reconstruct query parameters purely from the `DepNode`
they're associated with. Some queries could move straight to `HirId` but others
that don't always have a correspondance between `HirId` and `DefId` moved to
two-level maps where the query operates over a `DefIndex`, returning a map,
which is then keyed off `ItemLocalId`.
Closes#44414
In preparation for incremental compilation this commit refactors the lint
handling infrastructure in the compiler to be more "eager" and overall more
incremental-friendly. Many passes of the compiler can emit lints at various
points but before this commit all lints were buffered in a table to be emitted
at the very end of compilation. This commit changes these lints to be emitted
immediately during compilation using pre-calculated lint level-related data
structures.
Linting today is split into two phases, one set of "early" lints run on the
`syntax::ast` and a "late" set of lints run on the HIR. This commit moves the
"early" lints to running as late as possible in compilation, just before HIR
lowering. This notably means that we're catching resolve-related lints just
before HIR lowering. The early linting remains a pass very similar to how it was
before, maintaining context of the current lint level as it walks the tree.
Post-HIR, however, linting is structured as a method on the `TyCtxt` which
transitively executes a query to calculate lint levels. Each request to lint on
a `TyCtxt` will query the entire crate's 'lint level data structure' and then go
from there about whether the lint should be emitted or not.
The query depends on the entire HIR crate but should be very quick to calculate
(just a quick walk of the HIR) and the red-green system should notice that the
lint level data structure rarely changes, and should hopefully preserve
incrementality.
Overall this resulted in a pretty big change to the test suite now that lints
are emitted much earlier in compilation (on-demand vs only at the end). This in
turn necessitated the addition of many `#![allow(warnings)]` directives
throughout the compile-fail test suite and a number of updates to the UI test
suite.
resolve: Try to fix instability in import suggestions
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/42033
`lookup_import_candidates` walks module graph in DFS order and skips modules that were already visited (which is correct because there can be cycles).
However it means that if we visited `std::prelude::v1::Result::Ok` first, we will never visit `std::result::Result::Ok` because `Result` will be skipped as already visited (note: enums are also modules here), and otherwise, if we visited `std::result::Result::Ok` first, we will never get to `std::prelude::v1::Result::Ok`.
What child module of `std` (`prelude` or `result`) we will visit first, depends on randomized hashing, so we have instability in diagnostics.
With this patch modules' children are visited in stable order in `lookup_import_candidates`, this should fix the issue, but let's see what Travis will say.
r? @oli-obk
This PR kicks off the implementation of the [default binding modes RFC][1] by
introducing the `pat_binding_modes` typeck table mentioned in the [mentoring
instructions][2].
`pat_binding_modes` is populated in `librustc_typeck/check/_match.rs` and
used wherever the HIR would be scraped prior to this PR. Unfortunately, one
blemish, namely a two callers to `contains_explicit_ref_binding`, remains.
This will likely have to be removed when the second part of [1], the
`pat_adjustments` table, is tackled. Appropriate comments have been added.
See #42640.
[1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2005
[2]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/42640#issuecomment-313535089
