Fix inline_const with interpolated block
Interpolation already worked when we had a `const $block` that wasn't a statement expr:
```
fn foo() {
let _ = const $block;
}
```
But it was failing when the const block was in statement expr position:
```
fn foo() {
const $block;
}
```
... because of a bug in a check for const items. This fixes that.
---
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/112953#issuecomment-1631354481, though I don't think this requires an FCP since it's already supported in exprs and seems to me to be fully a parser bug.
Use `Cow` in `{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage`.
Each of `{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage::{Str,Eager}` has a comment:
```
// FIXME(davidtwco): can a `Cow<'static, str>` be used here?
```
This commit answers that question in the affirmative. It's not the most compelling change ever, but it might be worth merging.
This requires changing the `impl<'a> From<&'a str>` impls to `impl From<&'static str>`, which involves a bunch of knock-on changes that require/result in call sites being a little more precise about exactly what kind of string they use to create errors, and not just `&str`. This will result in fewer unnecessary allocations, though this will not have any notable perf effects given that these are error paths.
Note that I was lazy within Clippy, using `to_string` in a few places to preserve the existing string imprecision. I could have used `impl Into<{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage>` in various places as is done in the compiler, but that would have required changes to *many* call sites (mostly changing `&format("...")` to `format!("...")`) which didn't seem worthwhile.
r? `@WaffleLapkin`
Each of `{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage::{Str,Eager}` has a comment:
```
// FIXME(davidtwco): can a `Cow<'static, str>` be used here?
```
This commit answers that question in the affirmative. It's not the most
compelling change ever, but it might be worth merging.
This requires changing the `impl<'a> From<&'a str>` impls to `impl
From<&'static str>`, which involves a bunch of knock-on changes that
require/result in call sites being a little more precise about exactly
what kind of string they use to create errors, and not just `&str`. This
will result in fewer unnecessary allocations, though this will not have
any notable perf effects given that these are error paths.
Note that I was lazy within Clippy, using `to_string` in a few places to
preserve the existing string imprecision. I could have used `impl
Into<{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage>` in various places as is done in the
compiler, but that would have required changes to *many* call sites
(mostly changing `&format("...")` to `format!("...")`) which didn't seem
worthwhile.
Give a more useful location for where a span_bug was delayed
Before:
```
= note: delayed at 0: <rustc_errors::HandlerInner>::emit_diagnostic
at ./compiler/rustc_errors/src/lib.rs:1335:29
1: <rustc_errors::Handler>::emit_diagnostic
at ./compiler/rustc_errors/src/lib.rs:1124:9
...
```
After:
```
= note: delayed at compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/diagnostics.rs:2158:28
0: <rustc_errors::HandlerInner>::emit_diagnostic
at ./compiler/rustc_errors/src/lib.rs:1335:29
1: <rustc_errors::Handler>::emit_diagnostic
at ./compiler/rustc_errors/src/lib.rs:1124:9
...
```
This both makes the relevant frame easier to find without having to dig through diagnostic internals, and avoids the weird-looking formatting for the first frame.
Found while working on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/111529.
Do not recover when parsing stmt in cfg-eval.
`parse_stmt` does recovery on its own. When parsing the statement fails, we always get `Ok(None)` instead of an `Err` variant with the diagnostic that we can emit.
To avoid this behaviour, we need to opt-out of recovery for cfg_eval.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/105228
Before:
```
= note: delayed at 0: <rustc_errors::HandlerInner>::emit_diagnostic
at ./compiler/rustc_errors/src/lib.rs:1335:29
1: <rustc_errors::Handler>::emit_diagnostic
at ./compiler/rustc_errors/src/lib.rs:1124:9
...
```
After:
```
= note: delayed at compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/diagnostics.rs:2158:28
0: <rustc_errors::HandlerInner>::emit_diagnostic
at ./compiler/rustc_errors/src/lib.rs:1335:29
1: <rustc_errors::Handler>::emit_diagnostic
at ./compiler/rustc_errors/src/lib.rs:1124:9
```
This both makes the relevant frame easier to find without having to dig
through diagnostic internals, and avoids the weird-looking formatting
for the first frame.
Implement builtin # syntax and use it for offset_of!(...)
Add `builtin #` syntax to the parser, as well as a generic infrastructure to support both item and expression position builtin syntaxes. The PR also uses this infrastructure for the implementation of the `offset_of!` macro, added by #106934.
cc `@petrochenkov` `@DrMeepster`
cc #110680 `builtin #` tracking issue
cc #106655 `offset_of!` tracking issue
add hint for =< as <=
Adds a compiler hint for when `=<` is typed instead of `<=`
Example hint:
```rust
fn foo() {
if 1 =< 3 {
println!("Hello, World!");
}
}
```
```
error: expected type, found `3`
--> main.rs:2:13
|
2 | if 1 =< 3 {
| -- ^ expected type
| |
| help: did you mean: `<=`
```
This PR only emits the suggestion if there is no space between the `=` and `<`. This hopefully narrows the scope of when this error is emitted, however this still allows this error to be emitted in cases such as this:
```
error: expected expression, found `;`
--> main.rs:2:18
|
2 | if 1 =< [i32;; 3]>::hello() {
| -- ^ expected expression
| |
| help: did you mean: `<=`
```
Which could be a good reason not to merge since I haven't been able to think of any other ways of narrowing the scope of this diagnostic.
closes#111128
