Bail on more errors in dyn ty lowering
If we have more than one principal trait, or if we have a principal trait with errors in it, then bail with `TyKind::Error` rather than attempting lowering. Lowering a dyn trait with more than one principal just arbitrarily chooses the first one and drops the subsequent ones, and lowering a dyn trait path with errors in it is just kinda useless.
This suppresses unnecessary errors which I think is net-good, but also is important to make sure that we don't end up leaking `{type error}` in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133388 error messaging :)
r? types
Simplify array length mismatch error reporting (to not try to turn consts into target usizes)
This changes `TypeError::FixedArrayLen` to use `ExpectedFound<ty::Const<'tcx>>` (instead of `ExpectedFound<u64>`), and renames it to `TypeError::ArrayLen`. This allows us to avoid a `try_to_target_usize` call in the type relation, which ICEs when we have a scalar of the wrong bit length (i.e. u8).
This also makes `structurally_relate_tys` to always use this type error kind any time we have a const mismatch resulting from relating the array-len part of `[T; N]`.
This has the effect of changing the error message we issue for array length mismatches involving non-valtree consts. I actually quite like the change, though, since before:
```
LL | fn test<const N: usize, const M: usize>() -> [u8; M] {
| ------- expected `[u8; M]` because of return type
LL | [0; N]
| ^^^^^^ expected `M`, found `N`
|
= note: expected array `[u8; M]`
found array `[u8; N]`
```
and after, which I think is far less verbose:
```
LL | fn test<const N: usize, const M: usize>() -> [u8; M] {
| ------- expected `[u8; M]` because of return type
LL | [0; N]
| ^^^^^^ expected an array with a size of M, found one with a size of N
```
The only questions I have are:
1. Should we do something about backticks here? Right now we don't backtick either fully evaluated consts like `2`, or rigid consts like `Foo::BAR`.... but maybe we should? It seems kinda verbose to do for numbers -- maybe we could intercept those specifically.
2. I guess we may still run the risk of leaking unevaluated consts into error reporting like `2 + 1`...?
r? ``@BoxyUwU``
Fixes#126359Fixes#131101
Remove the `DefinitelyInitializedPlaces` analysis.
Its only use is in the `tests/ui/mir-dataflow/def_inits-1.rs` where it is tested via `rustc_peek_definite_init`.
Also, it's probably buggy. It's supposed to be the inverse of `MaybeUninitializedPlaces`, and it mostly is, except that `apply_terminator_effect` is a little different, and `apply_switch_int_edge_effects` is missing. Unlike `MaybeUninitializedPlaces`, which is used extensively in borrow checking, any bugs in `DefinitelyInitializedPlaces` are easy to overlook because it is only used in one small test.
This commit removes the analysis. It also removes
`rustc_peek_definite_init`, `Dual` and `MeetSemiLattice`, all of which are no longer needed.
r? ``@cjgillot``
Disable `avr-rjmp-offset` on Windows for now
The linker has been randomly crashing on `x86_64-mingw` that's causing spurious failures (#133480). Disable this test on Windows for now.
cc `@jfrimmel` (nothing actionable, just FYI because linker gonna linker)
cc `@ehuss` (who noticed this)
r? compiler (or anyone really)
tests: Add regression test for recursive enum with Cow and Clone
I could not find any existing test. `git grep "(Cow<'[^>]\+\["` gave no hits before this tests.
Closes#100347
Cleanup: delete `//@ pretty-expanded` directive
This PR removes the `//@ pretty-expanded` directive support in compiletest and removes its usage inside ui tests because it does not actually do anything, and its existence is itself misleading. This PR is split into two commits:
1. The first commit just drops `pretty-expanded` directive support in compiletest.
2. The second commit is created by `sd '//@ pretty-expanded.*\n' '' tests/ui/**/*.rs`[^1], reblessing, and slightly adjusting some leading whitespace in a few tests.
We can tell this is fully removed because compiletest doesn't complain about unknown directive when running the `ui` test suite.
cc #23616
### History
Originally, there was some effort to introduce more test coverage for `-Z unpretty=expanded` (in 2015 this was called `--pretty=expanded`). In [Make it an error to not declare used features #23598][pr-23598], there was a flip from `//@ no-pretty-expanded` (opt-out of `-Z
unpretty=expanded` test) to `//@ pretty-expanded` (opt-in to `-Z unpretty=expanded` test). This was needed because back then the dedicated `tests/pretty` ("pretty") test suite did not existed, and the pretty tests were grouped together under `run-pass` tests (I believe the `ui` test suite didn't exist back then either). Unfortunately, in this process the replacement `//@ pretty-expanded` directives contained a `FIXME #23616` linking to [There are very few tests for `-Z unpretty` expansion #23616][issue-23616]. But this was arguably backwards and somewhat misleading, as noted in [#23616](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/23616#issuecomment-484999901):
The attribute is off by default and things just work if you don't
test it, people have not been adding the `pretty-expanded`
annotation to new tests even if it would work.
Which basically renders this useless.
### Current status
As of Nov 2024, we have a dedicated `pretty` test suite, and some time over the years the split between `run-pass` into `ui` and `pretty` test suites caused all the `//@ pretty-expanded` in `ui` tests to do absolutely nothing: the compiletest logic for `pretty-expanded` only triggers in the *pretty* test suite, but none of the pretty tests use it. Oops.
Nobody remembers this, nobody uses this, it's misleading in ui tests. Let's get rid of this directive altogether.
[pr-23598]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/23598
[issue-23616]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/23616
### Follow-ups
- [x] Yeet this directive from rustc-dev-guide docs. https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/2147
[^1]: https://github.com/chmln/sd
r? compiler
Update test expectations to accept LLVM 'initializes' attribute
The test was checking for two `ptr` arguments by matching commas (or non-commas), however after
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117104 LLVM adds an `initializes((0, 16))` attribute, which includes a comma.
So instead, we make the test check for two LLVM values, i.e. something prefixed by %.
(See also https://crbug.com/380707238)
Tweak parameter mismatch explanation to not say `{unknown}`
* Tweak parameter mismatch explanation not to call parameters with no identifier `{unknown}`
* Say "both" when there are two parameters
* Backtick a type parameter name for consistency
Refactor `where` predicates, and reserve for attributes support
Refactor `WherePredicate` to `WherePredicateKind`, and reserve for attributes support in `where` predicates.
This is a part of #115590 and is split from #132388.
r? petrochenkov
The test was checking for two `ptr` arguments by matching commas (or
non-commas), however after
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117104 LLVM adds an
`initializes((0, 16))` attribute, which includes a comma.
So instead, we make the test check for two LLVM values, i.e. something
prefixed by %.
(See also https://crbug.com/380707238)
Support input/output in vector registers of s390x inline assembly (under asm_experimental_reg feature)
This extends currently clobber-only vector registers (`vreg`) support to allow passing `#[repr(simd)]` types, floats (f32/f64/f128), and integers (i32/i64/i128) as input/output.
This is unstable and gated under new `#![feature(asm_experimental_reg)]` (tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133416). If the feature is not enabled, only clober is supported as before.
| Architecture | Register class | Target feature | Allowed types |
| ------------ | -------------- | -------------- | -------------- |
| s390x | `vreg` | `vector` | `i32`, `f32`, `i64`, `f64`, `i128`, `f128`, `i8x16`, `i16x8`, `i32x4`, `i64x2`, `f32x4`, `f64x2` |
This matches the list of types that are supported by the vector registers in LLVM:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/llvmorg-19.1.0/llvm/lib/Target/SystemZ/SystemZRegisterInfo.td#L301-L313
In addition to `core::simd` types and floats listed above, custom `#[repr(simd)]` types of the same size and type are also allowed. All allowed types other than i32/f32/i64/f64/i128, and relevant target features are currently unstable.
Currently there is no SIMD type for s390x in `core::arch`, but this is tracked in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130869.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130869 about vector facility support in s390x
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/125398 & https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116909 about f128 support in asm
`@rustbot` label +O-SystemZ +A-inline-assembly
Fix asm goto with outputs and move it to a separate feature gate
Tracking issue: #119364
This PR addresses 3 aspects of asm goto with outputs:
* Codegen is fixed. My initial implementation has an oversight which cause the output to be only stored in fallthrough path, but not in label blocks.
* Outputs can now be used with `options(noreturn)` if a label block is given.
* All of this is moved to a new feature gate, because we likely want to stabilise `asm_goto` before asm goto with outputs.
`@rustbot` labels: +A-inline-assembly +F-asm
add a test for target-feature-ABI warnings in closures and when calling extern fn
Also update the comment regarding the inheritance of target features into closures, to make it more clear that we really shouldn't do this right now.
Constify the `Deref`/`DerefMut` traits, too
One more constification. Rebased on that one commit that makes it so we don't need to provide stability on const impls.
r? fee1-dead
only store valid proc macro item for doc link
Fixes#132743
The definition item can be detected if it is exported in the doc, so store these items rather than skipping.
r? `@petrochenkov`
When labels are present, the `noreturn` option really means that asm block
won't fallthrough -- if labels are present, then outputs can still be
meaningfully used.
