Reducing `target_feature` check-cfg merge conflicts
It was rightfully pointed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133099#discussion_r1862490542 that the expected values for the `target_feature` cfg are regularly updated and unfortunately the check-cfg tests for it are very merge-conflict prone.
This PR aims at drastically reducing the likely-hood of those, by normalizing the "and X more" diagnostic, as well as making the full expected list multi-line instead of being on a single one.
cc `@RalfJung`
r? `@jieyouxu`
fix ICE when promoted has layout size overflow
Turns out there is no reason to distinguish `tainted_by_errors` and `can_be_spurious` here, we can just track whether we allow this even in "infallible" constants.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/125476
Use c"lit" for CStrings without unwrap
I've reviewed uses of `CString::new("lit")`.
Some could be changed to `c"lit"`. Some could be changed to `c"lit".to_owned()`, avoiding an `unwrap()`.
Many `CString` documentation examples could be simplified. I deliberately haven't changed all the examples to use the exact same expression, so that they can demonstrate many ways of creating `CString`s.
I've left UI tests mostly unchanged, because `c""` requires edition 2021, but most UI tests use 2015, and I didn't want to accidentally change what the tests are testing.
Move `Const::{from_anon_const,try_from_lit}` to hir_ty_lowering
Fixes#128176.
This accomplishes one of the followup items from #131081.
These operations are much more about lowering the HIR than about
`Const`s themselves. They fit better in hir_ty_lowering with
`lower_const_arg` (formerly `Const::from_const_arg`) and the rest.
To accomplish this, `const_evaluatable_predicates_of` had to be changed
to not use `from_anon_const` anymore. Instead of visiting the HIR and
lowering anon consts on the fly, it now visits the `rustc_middle::ty`
data structures instead and directly looks for `UnevaluatedConst`s. This
approach was proposed in:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131081#discussion_r1821189257
r? `@BoxyUwU`
show forbidden_lint_groups in future-compat reports
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81670. This has been a future-compat lint for a while, time to dial it up to show up in reports.
These operations are much more about lowering the HIR than about
`Const`s themselves. They fit better in hir_ty_lowering with
`lower_const_arg` (formerly `Const::from_const_arg`) and the rest.
To accomplish this, `const_evaluatable_predicates_of` had to be changed
to not use `from_anon_const` anymore. Instead of visiting the HIR and
lowering anon consts on the fly, it now visits the `rustc_middle::ty`
data structures instead and directly looks for `UnevaluatedConst`s. This
approach was proposed in:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131081#discussion_r1821189257
Add pretty-printer parenthesis insertion test
This test demonstrates numerous bugs in rustc_ast_pretty, including all five of:
- Failing to insert parentheses where necessary to preserve the meaning of a syntax tree, producing invalid syntax.
- Failing to insert parentheses, producing valid syntax with the wrong meaning.
- Inserting too many parentheses.
- Inserting parentheses in the wrong place, producing invalid syntax.
- Losing syntactically significant parts of the syntax tree.
These pretty-printer bugs have consequences for `-Zunpretty=expanded`. The `cargo expand` subcommand cannot work reliably unless rustc can consistently produce valid Rust output. Erroneous syntax cannot be passed through rustfmt, or queried with [syn-select](https://crates.io/crates/syn-select).
The test in this PR is a port of a test from Syn that tests the automatic parenthesis insertion performed by Syn's `ToTokens` impls. In Syn we actually run this test over every expression in every Rust source file in the whole rust-lang/rust repo, including rustc and the standard library and tools and test suites. For the test here, I have only used a small selection of interesting expressions. This will serve as an easy spot to accumulate regression tests as the various bugs get fixed. Once rustc's pretty-printer is in better shape, it's possible that the test can be expanded to cover a larger set of expressions collected automatically like in Syn.
rustdoc-json: Include safety of `static`s
`static`s in an `extern` block can have an associated safety annotation ["because there is nothing guaranteeing that the bit pattern at the static’s memory is valid for the type it is declared with"](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/items/external-blocks.html#statics). Rustdoc already knows this and displays in for HTML. This PR also includes it in JSON.
Inspired by https://github.com/obi1kenobi/cargo-semver-checks/issues/975 which needs this, but it's probably useful in other places.
r? `@GuillaumeGomez.` Possibly easier to review commit-by-commit.
coverage: Use a query to identify which counter/expression IDs are used
Given that we already have a query to identify the highest-numbered counter ID in a MIR body, we can extend that query to also build bitsets of used counter/expression IDs. That lets us avoid some messy coverage bookkeeping during the main MIR traversal for codegen.
This does mean that we fail to treat some IDs as used in certain MIR-inlining scenarios, but I think that's fine, because it means that the results will be consistent across all instantiations of a function.
---
There's some more cleanup I want to do in the function coverage collector, since it isn't really collecting anything any more, but I'll leave that for future work.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #132974 (Properly pass linker arguments that contain commas)
- #133403 (Make `adjust_fulfillment_errors` work with `HostEffectPredicate` and `const_conditions`)
- #133482 (Only error raw lifetime followed by `\'` in edition 2021+)
- #133595 (Do not emit `missing_doc_code_examples` rustdoc lint on module and a few other items)
- #133669 (Move some functions out of const_swap feature gate)
- #133674 (Fix chaining `carrying_add`s)
- #133691 (Check let source before suggesting annotation)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Do not emit `missing_doc_code_examples` rustdoc lint on module and a few other items
It doesn't make sense to expect modules to have code examples. Same goes for:
* Trait aliases
* Foreign items
* Associated types and constants
Should make the use of this lint a bit nicer.
r? ``@notriddle``
Only error raw lifetime followed by `\'` in edition 2021+
Fixes#133479
cc #132341
I think this fixes a purely theoretical regression since it only affects edition 2015 (who is using that?) and only in the very rare case of a raw lifetime followed immediately by a lifetime like `'r#a'r`.
Make `adjust_fulfillment_errors` work with `HostEffectPredicate` and `const_conditions`
Greatly improves the spans for reporting unsatisfied `~const` bounds :)
r? project-const-traits or maybe ``@lcnr`` (if you want to deal with a diagnostics PR lmao)
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #128184 (std: refactor `pthread`-based synchronization)
- #132047 (Robustify and genericize return-type-notation resolution in `resolve_bound_vars`)
- #133515 (fix: hurd build, stat64.st_fsid was renamed to st_dev)
- #133602 (fix: fix codeblocks in `PathBuf` example)
- #133622 (update link to "C++ Exceptions under the hood" blog)
- #133660 (Do not create trait object type if missing associated types)
- #133686 (Add diagnostic item for `std::ops::ControlFlow`)
- #133689 (Fixed typos by changing `happend` to `happened`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Robustify and genericize return-type-notation resolution in `resolve_bound_vars`
#129629 implemented return-type-notation (RTN) in its path form, like `where T::method(..): Bound`. As part of lowering, we must record the late-bound vars for the where clause introduced by the method (namely, its early- and late-bound lifetime arguments, since `where T::method(..)` turns into a higher-ranked where clause over all of the lifetimes according to [RFC 3654](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3654-return-type-notation.html#converting-to-higher-ranked-trait-bounds)).
However, this logic was only looking at the where clauses of the parent item that the `T::method(..)` bound was written on, and not any parent items. This PR generalizes that logic to look at the parent item (i.e. the outer impl or trait) instead and fixes a (debug only) assertion as an effect.
This logic is also more general and likely easier to adapt to more interesting (though likely very far off) cases like non-lifetime binder `for<T: Trait> T::method(..): Send` bounds.
Tracking:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/109417
Respect verify-llvm-ir option in the backend
We are currently unconditionally verifying the LLVM IR in the backend (twice), ignoring the value of the verify-llvm-ir option. This has substantial compile-time impact for debug builds.
