Hide errors whose suggestions would contain error constants or types
best reviewed commit-by-commit.
This is work towards cleaning up everything around `lit_to_const` and its mir equivalent.
fixes#123809
Do not implement unsafe auto traits for types with unsafe fields
If a type has unsafe fields, its safety invariants are not simply the conjunction of its field types' safety invariants. Consequently, it's invalid to reason about the safety properties of these types in a purely structural manner — i.e., the manner in which `auto` traits are implemented. Consequently, auto implementations of unsafe auto traits should not be generated for types with unsafe fields.
Tracking: #132922
r? `@compiler-errors`
It was inconsistently done (sometimes even within a single function) and
most of the rest of the compiler uses fatal errors instead, which need
to be caught using catch_with_exit_code anyway. Using fatal errors
instead of ErrorGuaranteed everywhere in the driver simplifies things a
bit.
Stabilize noop_waker
Tracking Issue: #98286
This is a handy feature that's been used widely in tests and example async code and it'd be nice to make it available to users.
cc `@rust-lang/wg-async`
rust_for_linux: -Zreg-struct-return commandline flag for X86 (#116973)
Command line flag `-Zreg-struct-return` for X86 (32-bit) for rust-for-linux.
This flag enables the same behavior as the `abi_return_struct_as_int` target spec key.
- Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116973
If a type has unsafe fields, its safety invariants are not simply
the conjunction of its field types' safety invariants. Consequently,
it's invalid to reason about the safety properties of these types
in a purely structural manner — i.e., the manner in which `auto`
traits are implemented.
Makes progress towards #132922.
Adapt codegen tests for NUW inference
These were broken by 462cb3cd6c
Let me know if you think we should have a FIXME / tracking issue to update the tests after the LLVM 20 upgrade to make these required.
`@rustbot` label: +llvm-main
r? `@nikic`
Normalize target-cpus.rs stdout test for LLVM changes
LLVM has recently added support for the `lime1` CPU in 35cce408ee, so the `target-cpus.rs` test currently produces different output depending on the LLVM version.
This CL adds a normalization directive, to remove the new CPU from the output list.
Alternatives fixes I can think of:
* Add two revisions of the test (one per LLVM version)
* Ignore the test on one of the LLVM versions
* I dislike this, because it's possible that the test won't get updated for the next LLVM version.
I don't think the exact list of target CPUs is relevant for this test, so it shouldn't be too bad if the normalization sticks around longer than necessary.
`@rustbot` label: +llvm-main
Replace black with ruff in `tidy`
`ruff` can both lint and format Python code (in fact, it should be a mostly drop-in replacement for `black` in terms of formatting), so it's not needed to use `black` anymore. This PR removes `black` and replaces it with `ruff`, to get rid of one Python dependency, and also to make Python formatting faster (although that's a small thing).
If we decide to merge this, we'll need to "reformat the world" - `ruff` is not perfectly compatible with `black`, and it also looks like `black` was actually ignoring some files before. I tried it locally (`./x test tidy --extra-checks=py:fmt --bless`) and it also reformatted some code in subtrees (e.g. `clippy` or `rustc_codegen_gcc`) - I'm not sure how to handle that.
implement checks for tail calls
Quoting the [RFC draft](https://github.com/phi-go/rfcs/blob/guaranteed-tco/text/0000-explicit-tail-calls.md):
> The argument to become is a function (or method) call, that exactly matches the function signature and calling convention of the callee. The intent is to ensure a matching ABI. Note that lifetimes may differ as long as they pass borrow checking, see [below](https://github.com/phi-go/rfcs/blob/guaranteed-tco/text/0000-explicit-tail-calls.md#return-type-coercion) for specifics on the return type.
> Tail calling closures and tail calling from closures is not allowed. This is due to the high implementation effort, see below, this restriction can be lifted by a future RFC.
> Invocations of operators were considered as valid targets but were rejected on grounds of being too error-prone. In any case, these can still be called as methods.
> Tail calling [variadic functions](https://doc.rust-lang.org/beta/unstable-book/language-features/c-variadic.html) and tail calling from variadic functions is not allowed. As support for variadic function is stabilized on a per target level, support for tail-calls regarding variadic functions would need to follow a similar approach. To avoid this complexity and to minimize implementation effort for backends, this interaction is currently not allowed but support can be added with a future RFC.
-----
The checks are implemented as a query, similarly to `check_unsafety`.
The code is cherry-picked straight out of #112657 which was written more than a year ago, so I expect we might need to change some things ^^"
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #118833 (Add lint against function pointer comparisons)
- #122161 (Fix suggestion when shorthand `self` has erroneous type)
- #133233 (Add context to "const in pattern" errors)
- #133761 (Update books)
- #133843 (Do not emit empty suggestion)
- #133863 (Rename `core_pattern_type` and `core_pattern_types` lib feature gates to `pattern_type_macro`)
- #133872 (No need to create placeholders for GAT args in confirm_object_candidate)
- #133874 (`fn_sig_for_fn_abi` should return a `ty::FnSig`, no need for a binder)
- #133890 (Add a new test ui/incoherent-inherent-impls/no-other-unrelated-errors to check E0116 does not cause unrelated errors)
- #133892 (Revert #133817)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Add a new test ui/incoherent-inherent-impls/no-other-unrelated-errors to check E0116 does not cause unrelated errors
rustc xxx (we do not know) to 1.82.0 emits unrelated errors when E0116 is present (see #125814).
We do not know what caused and fixed it, but add a test to confirm rustc does not cause the same error in the future.
Rename `core_pattern_type` and `core_pattern_types` lib feature gates to `pattern_type_macro`
That's what the gates are actually gating, and the single char difference in naming was not helpful either
fixes#128987
Do not emit empty suggestion
The `println!();` statement's span doesn't include the `;`, and the modified suggestions where trying to get the `;` by getting the differenece between the statement's and the expression's spans, which was an empty suggestion.
Fix#133833, fix#133834.
Add context to "const in pattern" errors
*Each commit addresses specific diagnostics.*
- Add primary span labels
- Point at `const` item, and `const` generic param definition
- Reword messages and notes
- Point at generic param through which an associated `const` is being referenced
- Silence const in pattern with evaluation errors when they come from `const` items that already emit a diagnostic
- On non-structural type in const used as pattern, point at the type that should derive `PartialEq`
Add lint against function pointer comparisons
This is kind of a follow-up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117758 where we added a lint against wide pointer comparisons for being ambiguous and unreliable; well function pointer comparisons are also unreliable. We should IMO follow a similar logic and warn people about it.
-----
## `unpredictable_function_pointer_comparisons`
*warn-by-default*
The `unpredictable_function_pointer_comparisons` lint checks comparison of function pointer as the operands.
### Example
```rust
fn foo() {}
let a = foo as fn();
let _ = a == foo;
```
### Explanation
Function pointers comparisons do not produce meaningful result since they are never guaranteed to be unique and could vary between different code generation units. Furthermore different function could have the same address after being merged together.
----
This PR also uplift the very similar `clippy::fn_address_comparisons` lint, which only linted on if one of the operand was an `ty::FnDef` while this PR lints proposes to lint on all `ty::FnPtr` and `ty::FnDef`.
```@rustbot``` labels +I-lang-nominated
~~Edit: Blocked on https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/323 being accepted and it's follow-up pr~~
Make sure to record deps from cached task in new solver on first run
We weren't actually performing a read of the dep node in `with_cached_task` in the new solver, which meant that all queries that computed a goal for the first time were just not recording the query dependencies that we call in that query.
In the incremental test, the typeck query for `fn poll` isn't being marked red even tho it's invalidated due to its writeback results changing. This happens b/c we normalize `Self::Error` into `Error`, which should call `type_of` which is a red query (since `ty::Adt` contains an `AdtDef`, and that `AdtDef`'s stable hash changes since it's ). However, since we weren't tracking deps in that normalize query, the typeck result was remaining green, and we were trying to decode a def id that no longer exists (the field that got removed).
r? lcnr
rustc xxx (we do not know) to 1.82.0 emits unrelated errors when E0116
is present (see #125814).
We do not know what caused and fixed it, but add a test to confirm rustc
does not cause the same error in the future.
Point at types that need to be marked with `#[derive(PartialEq)]`.
We use a visitor to look at a type that isn't structural, looking for all ADTs that don't derive `PartialEq`. These can either be manual `impl PartialEq`s or no `impl` at all, so we differentiate between those two cases to provide more context to the user. We also only point at types and impls from the local crate, otherwise show only a note.
```
error: constant of non-structural type `&[B]` in a pattern
--> $DIR/issue-61188-match-slice-forbidden-without-eq.rs:15:9
|
LL | struct B(i32);
| -------- must be annotated with `#[derive(PartialEq)]` to be usable in patterns
LL |
LL | const A: &[B] = &[];
| ------------- constant defined here
...
LL | A => (),
| ^ constant of non-structural type
|
= note: see https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/marker/trait.StructuralPartialEq.html for details
```
- Point at type that should derive `PartialEq` to be structural.
- Point at manual `impl PartialEq`, explaining that it is not sufficient to be structural.
```
error: constant of non-structural type `MyType` in a pattern
--> $DIR/const-partial_eq-fallback-ice.rs:14:12
|
LL | struct MyType;
| ------------- `MyType` must be annotated with `#[derive(PartialEq)]` to be usable in patterns
...
LL | const CONSTANT: &&MyType = &&MyType;
| ------------------------ constant defined here
...
LL | if let CONSTANT = &&MyType {
| ^^^^^^^^ constant of non-structural type
|
note: the `PartialEq` trait must be derived, manual `impl`s are not sufficient; see https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/marker/trait.StructuralPartialEq.html for details
--> $DIR/const-partial_eq-fallback-ice.rs:5:1
|
LL | impl PartialEq<usize> for MyType {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
```
error: trait object `dyn Send` cannot be used in patterns
--> $DIR/issue-70972-dyn-trait.rs:6:9
|
LL | const F: &'static dyn Send = &7u32;
| -------------------------- constant defined here
...
LL | F => panic!(),
| ^ trait object can't be used in patterns
```
- Add primary span labels.
- Point at const generic parameter used as pattern.
- Point at statics used as pattern.
- Point at let bindings used in const pattern.
Centralize emitting an error in `const_to_pat` so that all errors from that evaluating a `const` in a pattern can add addditional information. With this, now point at the `const` item's definition:
```
error[E0158]: constant pattern depends on a generic parameter
--> $DIR/associated-const-type-parameter-pattern.rs:20:9
|
LL | pub trait Foo {
| -------------
LL | const X: EFoo;
| ------------- constant defined here
...
LL | A::X => println!("A::X"),
| ^^^^
```
The `println!();` statement's span doesn't include the `;`, and the modified suggestions where trying to get the `;` by getting the differenece between the statement's and the expression's spans, which was an empty suggestion.
Fix#133833, fix#133834.
