Using "having" in both the leading sentence and the bullets is unnecessary.
It makes it read as "it is only possible to have having several immutable...".
ABI compatibility: remove section on target features
Once https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127731 lands, we will properly diagnose ABI issues caused by target feature mismatch (at least on tier 1 targets). So I'd say we can remove the corresponding part of the docs here -- this is now something the compiler can take care of, so programmers don't need to be concerned. For now this is just a lint, but that's just a transition period, like in prior cases where we fix I-unsound bugs by adding a new check that goes through the "future incompatibility" stages. We have decided that it's actually a bug that we have ABI risks around target features, and we shouldn't document that bug as-if it was intended behavior.
Cc `@rust-lang/opsem` `@chorman0773` `@veluca93`
Add new unstable feature `const_eq_ignore_ascii_case`
Tracking issue - #131719
Mark `[u8]`, `str` `eq_ignore_ascii_case` functions const
---
The codegen for this implementation matches the existing `iter::zip` implementation better than incrementing with a counter
while loop with counter - https://rust.godbolt.org/z/h9cs5zajc
while let - https://rust.godbolt.org/z/ecMeMjjEb
The new `is_ascii` function is optimized to use the
`pmovmskb` vector instruction which tests the high bit in a lane.
This corresponds to the same check of whether a byte is ASCII so
ASCII validity checking can be vectorized. This instruction
does not exist on other platforms so it is likely to regress performance
and is gated to all(target_arch = "x86_64", target_feature = "sse2").
Add codegen test
Remove crate::mem import for functions included in the prelude
make char::is_whitespace unstably const
I am adding this to the existing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/132241 feature gate, since `is_digit` and `is_whitespace` seem similar enough that one can group them together.
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #132259 (rustc_codegen_llvm: Add a new 'pc' option to branch-protection)
- #132409 (CI: switch 7 linux jobs to free runners)
- #132498 (Suggest fixing typos and let bindings at the same time)
- #132524 (chore(style): sync submodule exclusion list between tidy and rustfmt)
- #132567 (Properly suggest `E::assoc` when we encounter `E::Variant::assoc`)
- #132571 (add const_eval_select macro to reduce redundancy)
- #132637 (Do not filter empty lint passes & re-do CTFE pass)
- #132642 (Add documentation on `ast::Attribute`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
add const_eval_select macro to reduce redundancy
I played around a bit with a macro to make const_eval_select invocations look a bit nicer and avoid repeating the argument lists. Here's what I got. What do you think?
I didn't apply this everywhere yet because I wanted to gather feedback first.
The second commit moves the macros from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/132542 into a more sensible place. It didn't seem worth its own PR and would conflict with this PR if done separately.
Cc ``@oli-obk`` ``@saethlin`` ``@tgross35``
try-job: dist-aarch64-msvc
[core/fmt] Replace checked slice indexing by unchecked to support panic-free code
Fixes#126425
Replace the potentially panicking `[]` indexing with `get_unchecked()` to prevent linking with panic-related code.
Stabilise `const_char_encode_utf16`.
Closes: #130660
This PR stabilises the `const_char_encode_utf16` feature gate (i.e. support for `char::encode_utf16` in constant expressions).
~~Note that the linked tracking issue is as of this writing currently awaiting FCP until 2024-11-02.~~
Improve example of `impl Pattern for &[char]`
The previous version used `['l', 'l']` as pattern, which would suggest that it matches the `ll` of `Hello world` as a whole.
remove const-support for align_offset and is_aligned
As part of the recent discussion to stabilize `ptr.is_null()` in const context, the general vibe was that it's okay for a const function to panic when the same operation would work at runtime (that's just a case of "dynamically detecting that something is not supported as a const operation"), but it is *not* okay for a const function to just return a different result.
Following that, `is_aligned` and `is_aligned_to` have their const status revoked in this PR, since they do return actively wrong results at const time. In the future we can consider having a new intrinsic or so that can check whether a pointer is "guaranteed to be aligned", but the current implementation based on `align_offset` does not have the behavior we want.
In fact `align_offset` itself behaves quite strangely in const, and that support needs a bunch of special hacks. That doesn't seem worth it. Instead, the users that can fall back to a different implementation should just use const_eval_select directly, and everything else should not be made const-callable. So this PR does exactly that, and entirely removes const support for align_offset.
Closes some tracking issues by removing the associated features:
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90962
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/104203
Cc `@rust-lang/wg-const-eval` `@rust-lang/libs-api`
Yeet the `effects` feature, move it onto `const_trait_impl`
This PR merges the `effects` feature into the `const_trait_impl` feature. There's really no need to have two feature gates for one feature.
After this PR, if `const_trait_impl` **is** enabled:
* Users can use and define const traits
* `HostEffect` const conditions will be enforced on the HIR
* We re-check the predicates in MIR just to make sure that we don't "leak" anything during MIR lowering
And if `const_trait_impl` **is not** enabled:
* Users cannot use nor define const traits
* `HostEffect` const conditions are not enforced on the HIR
* We will raise a const validation error if we call a function that has any const conditions (i.e. const traits and functions with any `~const` in their where clasues)
This should be the last step for us to be able to enable const traits in the standard library. We still need to re-constify `Drop` and `Destruct` and stuff for const traits to be particularly *useful* for some cases, but this is a good step :D
r? fee1-dead
cc `@rust-lang/project-const-traits`
Operations like is_aligned would return actively wrong results at compile-time,
i.e. calling it on the same pointer at compiletime and runtime could yield
different results. That's no good.
Instead of having hacks to make align_offset kind-of work in const-eval, just
use const_eval_select in the few places where it makes sense, which also ensures
those places are all aware they need to make sure the fallback behavior is
consistent.
This change updates the documentation for `NonZero` integer types to
explicitly reference the underlying integer type each `NonZero` variant
wraps, instead of using a general "integer" term.
better test for const HashMap; remove const_hash leftovers
The existing `const_with_hasher` test is kind of silly since the HashMap it constructs can never contain any elements. So this adjusts the test to construct a usable HashMap, which is a bit non-trivial since the default hash builder cannot be built in `const`. `BuildHasherDefault::new()` helps but is unstable (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123197), so we also have a test that does not involve that type.
The second commit removes the last remnants of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/104061, since they aren't actually useful -- without const traits, you can't do any hashing in `const`.
Cc ``@rust-lang/libs-api`` ``@rust-lang/wg-const-eval``
Closes#104061
Related to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/102575
Add LowerExp and UpperExp implementations to NonZero
Adds `LowerExp` and `UpperExp` trait implementations to `NonZero`, as discussed in rust-lang/libs-team#458.
I had to modify the macro to mark the new impls with a different rust version. Let me know if this is the right way to do it (first timer here!)
