Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #133238 (re-export `is_loongarch_feature_detected`)
- #133288 (Support `each_ref` and `each_mut` in `[T; N]` in constant expressions.)
- #133311 (Miri subtree update)
- #133313 (Use arc4random of libc for RTEMS target)
- #133319 (Simplify `fulfill_implication`)
- #133323 (Bail in effects in old solver if self ty is ty var)
- #133330 (library: update comment around close())
- #133337 (Fix typo in `std:🧵:Scope::spawn` documentation.)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Bail in effects in old solver if self ty is ty var
Otherwise when we try to check something like `?t: ~const Trait` we'll immediately stick it to the first param-env candidate, lol.
r? lcnr
Its only use is in the `tests/ui/mir-dataflow/def_inits-1.rs` where it
is tested via `rustc_peek_definite_init`.
Also, it's probably buggy. It's supposed to be the inverse of
`MaybeUninitializedPlaces`, and it mostly is, except that
`apply_terminator_effect` is a little different, and
`apply_switch_int_edge_effects` is missing. Unlike
`MaybeUninitializedPlaces`, which is used extensively in borrow
checking, any bugs in `DefinitelyInitializedPlaces` are easy to overlook
because it is only used in one small test.
This commit removes the analysis. It also removes
`rustc_peek_definite_init`, `Dual` and `MeetSemiLattice`, all of which
are no longer needed.
[AIX] change system dynamic library format
Historically on AIX, almost all dynamic libraries are distributed in `.a` Big Archive Format which can consists of both static and shared objects in the same archive (e.g. `libc++abi.a(libc++abi.so.1)`). During the initial porting process, the dynamic libraries are kept as `.a` to simplify the migration, but semantically having an XCOFF object under the archive extension is wrong. For crate type `cdylib` we want to be able to distribute the libraries as archives as well.
We are migrating to archives with the following format:
```
$ ar -t lib<name>.a
lib<name>.so
```
where each archive contains a single member that is a shared XCOFF object that can be loaded.
Fix closure arg extraction in `extract_callable_info`, generalize it to async closures
* Fix argument extraction in `extract_callable_info`
* FIx `extract_callable_info` to work for async closures
* Remove redundant `is_fn_ty` which is just a less general `extract_callable_info`
* More precisely name what is being called (i.e. call it a "closure" not a "function")
Review this without whitespace -- I ended up reformatting `extract_callable_info` because some pesky `//` comments were keeping the let-chains from being formatted.
For the code pattern reported in
<https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133272>,
```rs
impl Foo {
fn fun() {
let S { ref Self } = todo!();
}
}
```
<https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121208> converted this to a
`span_bug` from a `span_delayed_bug` because this specific self-ctor
code pattern lacked test coverage. It turns out this can be hit but we
just lacked test coverage, so change it back to a `span_delayed_bug` and
add a target tested case.
Add visits to nodes that already have flat_maps in ast::MutVisitor
This PR aims to add `visit_` methods for every node that has a `flat_map_` in MutVisitor, giving implementers free choice over overriding `flat_map` for 1-to-n conversions or `visit` for a 1-to-1.
There is one major problem: `flat_map_stmt`.
While all other default implementations of `flat_map`s are 1-to-1 conversion, as they either only call visits or a internal 1-to-many conversions are natural, `flat_map_stmt` doesn't follow this pattern.
`flat_map_stmt`'s default implementation is a 1-to-n conversion that panics if n > 1 (effectively being a 1-to-[0;1]). This means that it cannot be used as is for a default `visit_stmt`, which would be required to be a 1-to-1.
Implementing `visit_stmt` without runtime checks would require it to reach over a potential `flat_map_item` or `filter_map_expr` overrides and call for their `visit` counterparts directly.
Other than that, if we want to keep the behavior of `flat_map_stmt` it cannot call `visit_stmt` internally.
To me, it seems reasonable to make all default implementations 1-to-1 conversions and let implementers handle `visit_stmt` if they need it, but I don't know if calling `visit` directly when a 1-to-1 is required is ok or not.
related to #128974 & #127615
r? ``@petrochenkov``
Store resolution for self and crate root module segments
Let's make sure to record the segment resolution for `self::`, `crate::` and `$crate::`.
I'm actually somewhat surprised that the only diagnostic that uses this is the one that errors on invalid generics on a module segment... but seems strictly more correct regardless, and there may be other diagnostics using these segments resolutions that just haven't been tested for `self`. Also includes a drive-by on `report_prohibit_generics_error`.
Emscripten: link with -sWASM_BIGINT
When linking an executable without dynamic linking, this is a pure improvement. It significantly reduces code size and avoids a lot of buggy behaviors. It is supported in all browsers for many years and in all maintained versions of Node.
It does change the ABI, so people who are dynamically linking with a library or executable that uses the old ABI may need to turn it off. It can be disabled if needed by passing `-Clink-arg -sWASM_BIGINT=0` to `rustc`. But few people will want to turn it off.
Note this includes a libc bump to 0.2.162!
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #129838 (uefi: process: Add args support)
- #130800 (Mark `get_mut` and `set_position` in `std::io::Cursor` as const.)
- #132708 (Point at `const` definition when used instead of a binding in a `let` statement)
- #133226 (Make `PointerLike` opt-in instead of built-in)
- #133244 (Account for `wasm32v1-none` when exporting TLS symbols)
- #133257 (Add `UnordMap::clear` method)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
I think the control flow in this function is complicated and confusing,
largely due to the use of two booleans `print_formatted` and
`fallback_to_println` that are set in multiple places and then used to
guide proceedings.
As well as hurting readability, this leads to at least one bug: if the
`write_termcolor_buf` call fails and the pager also fails, the function
will try to print color output to stdout, but that output will be empty
because `write_termcolor_buf` failed. I.e. the `if fallback_to_println`
body fails to check `print_formatted`.
This commit rewrites the function to be neater and more Rust-y, e.g. by
putting the result of `write_termcolor_buf` into an `Option` so it can
only be used on success, and by using `?` more. It also changes
terminology a little, using "pretty" to mean "formatted and colorized".
The result is a little shorter, more readable, and less buggy.
Current places where `Interpolated` is used are going to change to
instead use invisible delimiters. This prepares for that.
- It adds invisible delimiter cases to the `can_begin_*`/`may_be_*`
methods and the `failed_to_match_macro` that are equivalent to the
existing `Interpolated` cases.
- It adds panics/asserts in some places where invisible delimiters
should never occur.
- In `Parser::parse_struct_fields` it excludes an ident + invisible
delimiter from special consideration in an error message, because
that's quite different to an ident + paren/brace/bracket.
Pasted metavariables are wrapped in invisible delimiters, which
pretty-print as empty strings, and changing that can break some proc
macros. But error messages saying "expected identifer, found ``" are
bad. So this commit adds support for metavariables in `TokenDescription`
so they print as "metavariable" in error messages, instead of "``".
It's not used meaningfully yet, but will be needed to get rid of
interpolated tokens.
Account for `wasm32v1-none` when exporting TLS symbols
Exporting TLS related symbols was limited to `wasm32-unknown-unknown` because WASI and Emscripten (?) have their own infrastructure to deal with TLS. However, the introduction of `wasm32v1-none` is in the same boat as `wasm32-unknown-unknown`.
This PR adjust the mechanism to account for `wasm32v1-none` as well.
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/102385 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/102440.
r? ``@alexcrichton``
Make `PointerLike` opt-in instead of built-in
The `PointerLike` trait currently is a built-in trait that computes the layout of the type. This is a bit problematic, because types implement this trait automatically. Since this can be broken due to semver-compatible changes to a type's layout, this is undesirable. Also, calling `layout_of` in the trait system also causes cycles.
This PR makes the trait implemented via regular impls, and adds additional validation on top to make sure that those impls are valid. This could eventually be `derive()`d for custom smart pointers, and we can trust *that* as a semver promise rather than risking library authors accidentally breaking it.
On the other hand, we may never expose `PointerLike`, but at least now the implementation doesn't invoke `layout_of` which could cause ICEs or cause cycles.
Right now for a `PointerLike` impl to be valid, it must be an ADT that is `repr(transparent)` and the non-1zst field needs to implement `PointerLike`. There are also some primitive impls for `&T`/ `&mut T`/`*const T`/`*mut T`/`Box<T>`.
Point at `const` definition when used instead of a binding in a `let` statement
Modify `PatKind::InlineConstant` to be `ExpandedConstant` standing in not only for inline `const` blocks but also for `const` items. This allows us to track named `const`s used in patterns when the pattern is a single binding. When we detect that there is a refutable pattern involving a `const` that could have been a binding instead, we point at the `const` item, and suggest renaming. We do this for both `let` bindings and `match` expressions missing a catch-all arm if there's at least one single binding pattern referenced.
After:
```
error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding
--> $DIR/bad-pattern.rs:19:13
|
LL | const PAT: u32 = 0;
| -------------- missing patterns are not covered because `PAT` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable
...
LL | let PAT = v1;
| ^^^ pattern `1_u32..=u32::MAX` not covered
|
= note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant
= note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html
= note: the matched value is of type `u32`
help: introduce a variable instead
|
LL | let PAT_var = v1;
| ~~~~~~~
```
Before:
```
error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding
--> $DIR/bad-pattern.rs:19:13
|
LL | let PAT = v1;
| ^^^
| |
| pattern `1_u32..=u32::MAX` not covered
| missing patterns are not covered because `PAT` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable
| help: introduce a variable instead: `PAT_var`
|
= note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant
= note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html
= note: the matched value is of type `u32`
```
CC #132582.
