Remove a lit_to_const call
We have so many special cases of `match expr.kind { Lit() => {}, Unary(Neg, Lit()) => {} }`... I'm trying to figure out how to get these all unified, but outright removing some is good, too. So let's try it.
Tho we don't have many `const {}` blocks in the perf test suite... But I also don't know how common `const { 42 }` blocks are, I'd expect these to occur mostly from macros (like `thread_local!`)
Corrected a grammatical error in the explanation for E0751. Changed "exists" to "exist" to improve clarity and ensure proper grammar in the error message.
Hide errors whose suggestions would contain error constants or types
best reviewed commit-by-commit.
This is work towards cleaning up everything around `lit_to_const` and its mir equivalent.
fixes#123809
Do not implement unsafe auto traits for types with unsafe fields
If a type has unsafe fields, its safety invariants are not simply the conjunction of its field types' safety invariants. Consequently, it's invalid to reason about the safety properties of these types in a purely structural manner — i.e., the manner in which `auto` traits are implemented. Consequently, auto implementations of unsafe auto traits should not be generated for types with unsafe fields.
Tracking: #132922
r? `@compiler-errors`
It was inconsistently done (sometimes even within a single function) and
most of the rest of the compiler uses fatal errors instead, which need
to be caught using catch_with_exit_code anyway. Using fatal errors
instead of ErrorGuaranteed everywhere in the driver simplifies things a
bit.
Sync cg clif 2024 12 06
The main highlights this time are a Cranelift update disabling the clif ir verifier by default for better performance.
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` label +A-codegen +A-cranelift +T-compiler
Only allow PassMode::Direct for aggregates on wasm when using the C ABI
For the Rust ABI we don't have any ABI compat reasons to allow PassMode::Direct for aggregates.
Extend Miri to correctly pass mutable pointers through FFI
Based off of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129684, this PR further extends Miri to execute native calls that make use of pointers to *mutable* memory.
We adapt Miri's bookkeeping of internal state upon any FFI call that gives external code permission to mutate memory.
Native code may now possibly write and therefore initialize and change the pointer provenance of bytes it has access to: Such memory is assumed to be *initialized* afterwards and bytes are given *arbitrary (wildcard) provenance*. This enables programs that correctly use mutating FFI calls to run Miri without errors, at the cost of possibly missing Undefined Behaviour caused by incorrect usage of mutating FFI.
> <details>
>
> <summary> Simple example </summary>
>
> ```rust
> extern "C" {
> fn init_int(ptr: *mut i32);
> }
>
> fn main() {
> let mut x = std::mem::MaybeUninit::<i32>::uninit();
> let x = unsafe {
> init_int(x.as_mut_ptr());
> x.assume_init()
> };
>
> println!("C initialized my memory to: {x}");
> }
> ```
> ```c
> void init_int(int *ptr) {
> *ptr = 42;
> }
> ```
> should now show `C initialized my memory to: 42`.
>
> </details>
r? ``@RalfJung``
rust_for_linux: -Zreg-struct-return commandline flag for X86 (#116973)
Command line flag `-Zreg-struct-return` for X86 (32-bit) for rust-for-linux.
This flag enables the same behavior as the `abi_return_struct_as_int` target spec key.
- Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116973
If a type has unsafe fields, its safety invariants are not simply
the conjunction of its field types' safety invariants. Consequently,
it's invalid to reason about the safety properties of these types
in a purely structural manner — i.e., the manner in which `auto`
traits are implemented.
Makes progress towards #132922.
implement checks for tail calls
Quoting the [RFC draft](https://github.com/phi-go/rfcs/blob/guaranteed-tco/text/0000-explicit-tail-calls.md):
> The argument to become is a function (or method) call, that exactly matches the function signature and calling convention of the callee. The intent is to ensure a matching ABI. Note that lifetimes may differ as long as they pass borrow checking, see [below](https://github.com/phi-go/rfcs/blob/guaranteed-tco/text/0000-explicit-tail-calls.md#return-type-coercion) for specifics on the return type.
> Tail calling closures and tail calling from closures is not allowed. This is due to the high implementation effort, see below, this restriction can be lifted by a future RFC.
> Invocations of operators were considered as valid targets but were rejected on grounds of being too error-prone. In any case, these can still be called as methods.
> Tail calling [variadic functions](https://doc.rust-lang.org/beta/unstable-book/language-features/c-variadic.html) and tail calling from variadic functions is not allowed. As support for variadic function is stabilized on a per target level, support for tail-calls regarding variadic functions would need to follow a similar approach. To avoid this complexity and to minimize implementation effort for backends, this interaction is currently not allowed but support can be added with a future RFC.
-----
The checks are implemented as a query, similarly to `check_unsafety`.
The code is cherry-picked straight out of #112657 which was written more than a year ago, so I expect we might need to change some things ^^"
Fix "std" support status of some tier 3 targets
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127265 marked targets with empty "std" support status as no-std targets in target-spec metadata:
> * Where a targets 'std' or 'host tools' support is listed as '?' in the rust docs, these are left as 'None' with this PR. The corresponding changes in cargo will only reject an attempt to build std if the 'std' field is 'Some(false)'. In the case it is 'None', cargo will continue trying to build
However, this is not accurate because "std" support status has a marker indicating that it is a no-std target. (empty status is just invalid.)
https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/platform-support.html#tier-3
> The `std` column in the table below has the following meanings:
>
> * ✓ indicates the full standard library is available.
> * \* indicates the target only supports [`no_std`] development.
> * ? indicates the standard library support is unknown or a work-in-progress.
>
> [`no_std`]: https://rust-embedded.github.io/book/intro/no-std.html
This PR fixes the status of targets whose "std" support status is currently set to empty and update target-spec metadata.
The new status is set based on the following criteria:
- Set to ✓ for targets that I regularly check in [rust-cross-toolchain](https://github.com/taiki-e/rust-cross-toolchain) that the `cargo test` works. (riscv32-unknown-linux-gnu,{riscv64,s390x}-unknown-linux-musl)
- Targets where `cargo run` works but `cargo test` does not work tend to have incomplete std support (e.g., riscv32 musl f3068b66e0), so I included them in the group below that means “work in progress” rather than in this group.
- Set powerpc64le FreeBSD to ✓ on both std and host_tools, because the [Rust package](https://www.freshports.org/lang/rust/) is available.
- Set to ? (which means "unknown" or “work in progress”) for all other affected targets because these are Linux, Android, FreeBSD, or Fuchsia, all of which are operating systems that support std if properly supported.
r? Noratrieb
cc ``@harmou01``
It's a performance win because `MixedBitSet` is faster and uses less
memory than `ChunkedBitSet`.
Also reflow some overlong comment lines in
`lint_tail_expr_drop_order.rs`.
It just uses `BitSet` for small/medium sizes (<= 2048 bits) and
`ChunkedBitSet` for larger sizes. This is good because `ChunkedBitSet`
is slow and memory-hungry at smaller sizes.
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #118833 (Add lint against function pointer comparisons)
- #122161 (Fix suggestion when shorthand `self` has erroneous type)
- #133233 (Add context to "const in pattern" errors)
- #133761 (Update books)
- #133843 (Do not emit empty suggestion)
- #133863 (Rename `core_pattern_type` and `core_pattern_types` lib feature gates to `pattern_type_macro`)
- #133872 (No need to create placeholders for GAT args in confirm_object_candidate)
- #133874 (`fn_sig_for_fn_abi` should return a `ty::FnSig`, no need for a binder)
- #133890 (Add a new test ui/incoherent-inherent-impls/no-other-unrelated-errors to check E0116 does not cause unrelated errors)
- #133892 (Revert #133817)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
No need to create placeholders for GAT args in confirm_object_candidate
We no longer need this logic to add placeholders for GAT args since with the removal of the `gat_extended` feature gate (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133768) we no longer allow GATs in dyn trait anyways.
r? oli-obk
Do not emit empty suggestion
The `println!();` statement's span doesn't include the `;`, and the modified suggestions where trying to get the `;` by getting the differenece between the statement's and the expression's spans, which was an empty suggestion.
Fix#133833, fix#133834.
Add context to "const in pattern" errors
*Each commit addresses specific diagnostics.*
- Add primary span labels
- Point at `const` item, and `const` generic param definition
- Reword messages and notes
- Point at generic param through which an associated `const` is being referenced
- Silence const in pattern with evaluation errors when they come from `const` items that already emit a diagnostic
- On non-structural type in const used as pattern, point at the type that should derive `PartialEq`
Add lint against function pointer comparisons
This is kind of a follow-up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117758 where we added a lint against wide pointer comparisons for being ambiguous and unreliable; well function pointer comparisons are also unreliable. We should IMO follow a similar logic and warn people about it.
-----
## `unpredictable_function_pointer_comparisons`
*warn-by-default*
The `unpredictable_function_pointer_comparisons` lint checks comparison of function pointer as the operands.
### Example
```rust
fn foo() {}
let a = foo as fn();
let _ = a == foo;
```
### Explanation
Function pointers comparisons do not produce meaningful result since they are never guaranteed to be unique and could vary between different code generation units. Furthermore different function could have the same address after being merged together.
----
This PR also uplift the very similar `clippy::fn_address_comparisons` lint, which only linted on if one of the operand was an `ty::FnDef` while this PR lints proposes to lint on all `ty::FnPtr` and `ty::FnDef`.
```@rustbot``` labels +I-lang-nominated
~~Edit: Blocked on https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/323 being accepted and it's follow-up pr~~
