As is the current toy program:
fn main() -> std::io::Result<()> {
use std::fs;
let metadata = fs::metadata("foo.txt")?;
assert!(!metadata.is_dir());
Ok(())
}
... observed under strace will issue:
[snip]
statx(0, NULL, AT_STATX_SYNC_AS_STAT, STATX_ALL, NULL) = -1 EFAULT (Bad address)
statx(AT_FDCWD, "foo.txt", AT_STATX_SYNC_AS_STAT, STATX_ALL, {stx_mask=STATX_ALL|STATX_MNT_ID, stx_attributes=0, stx_mode=S_IFREG|0644, stx_size=0, ...}) = 0
While statx is not necessarily always present, checking for it can be
delayed to the first error condition. Said condition may very well never
happen, in which case the check got avoided altogether.
Note this is still suboptimal as there still will be programs issuing
it, but bulk of the problem is removed.
Tested by forbidding the syscall for the binary and observing it
correctly falls back to newfstatat.
While here tidy up the commentary, in particular by denoting some
problems with the current approach.
The `std::os::unix` module is stubbed out when building docs for these
target platforms. The introduction of Linux-specific extension traits
caused `std::os::net` to depend on sub-modules of `std::os::unix`,
which broke rustdoc for the `wasm32-unknown-unknown` target.
Adding an additional `#[cfg]` guard solves that rustdoc failure by
not declaring `linux_ext` on targets with a stubbed `std::os::unix`.
Currently, the `SeqCst` ordering is used, which seems unnecessary:
+ Even `Relaxed` ordering guarantees that all updates are atomic and are executed in total order
+ User code only reads atomic for monitoring purposes, no "happens-before" relationships with actual allocations and deallocations are needed for this
If argumentation above is correct, I propose changing ordering to `Relaxed` to clarify that no synchronization is required here, and improve performance (if somebody copy-pastes this example into their code).
Update `rand` in the stdlib tests, and remove the `getrandom` feature from it.
The main goal is actually removing `getrandom`, so that eventually we can allow running the stdlib test suite on tier3 targets which don't have `getrandom` support. Currently those targets can only run the subset of stdlib tests that exist in uitests, and (generally speaking), we prefer not to test libstd functionality in uitests, which came up recently in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104095 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104185. Additionally, the fact that we can't update `rand`/`getrandom` means we're stuck with the old set of tier3 targets, so can't test new ones.
~~Anyway, I haven't checked that this actually does allow use on tier3 targets (I think it does not, as some work is needed in stdlib submodules) but it moves us slightly closer to this, and seems to allow at least finally updating our `rand` dep, which definitely improves the status quo.~~ Checked and works now.
For the most part, our tests and benchmarks are fine using hard-coded seeds. A couple tests seem to fail with this (stuff manipulating the environment expecting no collisions, for example), or become pointless (all inputs to a function become equivalent). In these cases I've done a (gross) dance (ab)using `RandomState` and `Location::caller()` for some extra "entropy".
Trying to share that code seems *way* more painful than it's worth given that the duplication is a 7-line function, even if the lines are quite gross. (Keeping in mind that sharing it would require adding `rand` as a non-dev dep to std, and exposing a type from it publicly, all of which sounds truly awful, even if done behind a perma-unstable feature).
See also some previous attempts:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/86963 (in particular https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/86963#issuecomment-885438936 which explains why this is non-trivial)
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/89131
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/96626#issuecomment-1114562857 (I tried in that PR at the same time, but settled for just removing the usage of `thread_rng()` from the benchmarks, since that was the main goal).
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104185
- Probably more. It's very tempting of a thing to "just update".
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
default OOM handler: use non-unwinding panic, to match std handler
The OOM handler in std will by default abort. This adjusts the default in liballoc to do the same, using the `can_unwind` flag on the panic info to indicate a non-unwinding panic.
In practice this probably makes little difference since the liballoc default will only come into play in no-std situations where people write a custom panic handler, which most likely will not implement unwinding. But still, this seems more consistent.
Cc `@rust-lang/wg-allocators,` https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66741
Add notes and examples about non-intuitive `PathBuf::set_extension` behavior
Basically, passing the empty string will actually remove the extension instead of setting it to the empty string. This might change what is considered to be an extension. Additionally, passing an extension that contains dots will make the path only consider the last part of it to be the new extension.
Unify id-based thread parking implementations
Multiple platforms currently use thread-id-based parking implementations (NetBSD and SGX[^1]). Even though the strategy does not differ, these are duplicated for each platform, as the id is encoded into an atomic thread variable in different ways for each platform.
Since `park` is only called by one thread, it is possible to move the thread id into a separate field. By ensuring that the field is only written to once, before any other threads access it, these accesses can be unsynchronized, removing any restrictions on the size and niches of the thread id.
This PR also renames the internal `thread_parker` modules to `thread_parking`, as that name now better reflects their contents. I hope this does not add too much reviewing noise.
r? `@m-ou-se`
`@rustbot` label +T-libs
[^1]: SOLID supports this as well, I will switch it over in a follow-up PR.
Basically, passing the empty string will actually remove the extension
instead of setting it to the empty string. This might change what is
considered to be an extension. Additionally, passing an extension that
contains dots will make the path only consider the last part of it to be
the new extension.
Add #[inline] markers to once_cell methods
Added inline markers to all simple methods under the `once_cell` feature. Relates to #74465 and #105587
This should not block #105587
`IN6ADDR_ANY_INIT` and `IN6ADDR_LOOPBACK_INIT` documentation.
Added documentation for IPv6 Addresses `IN6ADDR_ANY_INIT` also known as `in6addr_any` and `IN6ADDR_LOOPBACK_INIT` also known as `in6addr_loopback` similar to `INADDR_ANY` for IPv4 Addresses.
Catch panics/unwinding in destruction of TLS values
`destroy_value` is/can be called from C code (libc). Unwinding from Rust to C code is undefined behavior, which is why unwinding is caught here.
This problem caused an infinite loop inside the unwinding code when running `src/test/ui/threads-sendsync/issue-24313.rs` on a tier 3 target (QNX/Neutrino) on aarch64.
See also https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/182449-t-compiler.2Fhelp/topic/Infinite.20unwinding.20bug.
kmc-solid: Fix memory ordering in thread operations
Fixes two memory ordering issues in the thread state machine (`ThreadInner::lifecycle`) of the [`*-kmc-solid_*`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/platform-support/kmc-solid.html) Tier 3 targets.
1. When detaching a thread that is still running (i.e., the owner updates `lifecycle` first, and the child updates it next), the first update did not synchronize-with the second update, resulting in a data race between the first update and the deallocation of `ThreadInner` by the child thread.
2. When joining on a thread, the joiner has to pass its own task ID to the joinee in order to be woken up later, but in doing so, it did not synchronize-with the read operation, creating possible sequences of execution where the joinee wakes up an incorrect or non-existent task.
Both issue are theoretical and most likely have never manifested in practice because of the stronger guarantees provided by the Arm memory model (particularly due to its barrier-based definition). Compiler optimizations could have subverted this, but the inspection of compiled code did not reveal such optimizations taking place.
Bump master bootstrap compiler
This PR bumps the bootstrap compiler to the beta created earlier this week, cherry-picks the stabilization version number updates, and updates the `cfg(bootstrap)`s.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
adjust message on non-unwinding panic
"thread panicked while panicking" is just plain wrong in case this is a non-unwinding panic, such as
- a panic out of a `nounwind` function
- the sanity checks we have in `mem::uninitialized` and `mem::zeroed`
- the optional debug assertion in various unsafe std library functions
Clarify `catch_unwind` docs about panic hooks
Makes it clear from `catch_unwind` docs that the panic hook will be called before the panic is caught.
Fixes#105432
