[rustc_ty_utils] Treat `drop_in_place`'s *mut argument like &mut when adding LLVM attributes
This resurrects PR #103614, which has sat idle for a while.
This could probably use a new perf run, since we're on a new LLVM version now.
r? `@oli-obk`
cc `@RalfJung`
---
LLVM can make use of the `noalias` parameter attribute on the parameter to `drop_in_place` in areas like argument promotion. Because the Rust compiler fully controls the code for `drop_in_place`, it can soundly deduce parameter attributes on it.
In #103957, Miri was changed to retag `drop_in_place`'s argument as if it was `&mut`, matching this change.
Deal with unnormalized projections when structurally resolving types with new solver
1. Normalize types in `structurally_resolved_type` when the new solver is enabled
2. Normalize built-in autoderef targets in `Autoderef` when the new solver is enabled
3. Normalize-erasing-regions in `resolve_type` in writeback
This is motivated by the UI test provided, which currently fails with:
```
error[E0609]: no field `x` on type `<usize as SliceIndex<[Foo]>>::Output`
--> <source>:9:11
|
9 | xs[0].x = 1;
| ^
```
I'm pretty happy with the approach in (1.) and (2.) and think we'll inevitably need something like this in the long-term, but (3.) seems like a hack to me. It's a *lot* of work to add tons of new calls to every user of these typeck results though (mir build, late lints, etc). Happy to discuss further.
r? `@lcnr`
Give better error when collecting into `&[T]`
The detection of slice reference of `{integral}` in `rustc_on_unimplemented` is hacky, but a proper solution requires changing `FmtPrinter` to add a parameter to print integers as `{integral}` and I didn't want to change it just for `rustc_on_unimplemented`. I can do that if requested, though.
I'm open to better wording; this is the best I could come up with.
fix recursion depth handling after confirmation
fixes#111729
I think having to use `Obligation::with_depth` correctly everywhere is very hard because e.g. the nested obligations from `eq` currently do not have the correct obligation depth.
The new solver [completely removes `recursion_depth` from obligations](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_middle/traits/solve/struct.Goal.html) and instead tracks the depth in the solver itself which is far easier to get right. Moving the old solver towards this shouldn't be that hard but is probably somewhat annoying.
r? `@matthewjasper`
Rather than returning an array of features from to_llvm_features, return a structure that contains
the dependencies. This also contains metadata on how the features depend on each other to allow for
the correct enabling and disabling.
Some features that are tied together only make sense to be folded
together when enabling the feature. For example on AArch64 sve and
neon are tied together, however it doesn't make sense to disable neon
when disabling sve.
In #91608 the fp-armv8 feature was removed as it's tied to the neon
feature. However disabling neon didn't actually disable the use of
floating point registers and instructions, for this `-fp-armv8` is
required.
Add extra debug assertions for equality for Adt/Variant/FieldDef
Would've made it easier to both catch and test https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111494. Maybe not worth it, since it does mean that the compiler is doing extra work when debug-assertions are enabled, but also that's what debug assertions are for :^)
This is a revival of #111523 because I think I pushed an empty branch and bors got a bit too excited it closed the PR.
Replace `QueryStruct` with arrays local to `rustc_query_impl`
This removes `QueryStruct` and instead uses constant arrays of function pointers for `try_collect_active_jobs`, `alloc_self_profile_query_strings` and `encode_query_results`. This further decouples `rustc_query_impl` from `rustc_middle`.
r? `@cjgillot`
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #111745 (Fix overflow in error emitter)
- #111770 (Read beta version from the version file if building from a source tarball)
- #111797 (Migrate GUI colors test to original CSS color format)
- #111809 (Unset MIRI_BLESS for mir-opt-level 4 miri tests)
- #111817 (Migrate GUI colors test to original CSS color format)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Fix overflow in error emitter
Fix#109854Close#94171 (was already fixed before but missing test)
This bug happens when a multipart suggestion spans more than one line.
The fix is to update the `acc` variable, which didn't handle the case when the text to remove spans multiple lines but the text to add spans only one line.
Also, use `usize::try_from` instead of `as usize` to detect overflows earlier in the future, and point to the source of the overflow (the original issue points to a different place where this value is used, not where the overflow had happened).
And finally add an `if start != end` check to avoid doing any extra work in case of empty ranges.
Long explanation:
Given this test case:
```rust
fn generate_setter() {
String::with_capacity(
//~^ ERROR this function takes 1 argument but 3 arguments were supplied
generate_setter,
r#"
pub(crate) struct Person<T: Clone> {}
"#,
r#""#,
);
}
```
The compiler will try to convert that code into the following:
```rust
fn generate_setter() {
String::with_capacity(
//~^ ERROR this function takes 1 argument but 3 arguments were supplied
/* usize */,
);
}
```
So it creates a suggestion with 3 separate parts:
```
// Replace "generate_setter" with "/* usize */"
SubstitutionPart { span: fuzz_input.rs:4:5: 4:20 (#0), snippet: "/* usize */" }
// Remove second arg (multiline string)
SubstitutionPart { span: fuzz_input.rs:4:20: 7:3 (#0), snippet: "" }
// Remove third arg (r#""#)
SubstitutionPart { span: fuzz_input.rs:7:3: 8:11 (#0), snippet: "" }
```
Each of this parts gets a separate `SubstitutionHighlight` (this marks the relevant text green in a terminal, the values are 0-indexed so `start: 4` means column 5):
```
SubstitutionHighlight { start: 4, end: 15 }
SubstitutionHighlight { start: 15, end: 15 }
SubstitutionHighlight { start: 18446744073709551614, end: 18446744073709551614 }
```
The 2nd and 3rd suggestion are empty (start = end) because they only remove text, so there are no additions to highlight. But the 3rd span has overflowed because the compiler assumes that the 3rd suggestion is on the same line as the first suggestion. The 2nd span starts at column 20 and the highlight starts at column 16 (15+1), so that suggestion is good. But since the 3rd span starts at column 3, the result is `3 - 4`, or column -1, which turns into -2 with 0-indexed, and that's equivalent to `18446744073709551614 as isize`.
With this fix, the resulting `SubstitutionHighlight` are:
```
SubstitutionHighlight { start: 4, end: 15 }
SubstitutionHighlight { start: 15, end: 15 }
SubstitutionHighlight { start: 15, end: 15 }
```
As expected. I guess ideally we shouldn't emit empty highlights when removing text, but I am too scared to change that.
Don't inline functions with unsized args
Fixes#111355 .
I have some ideas for how we can get this back in the future, out of scope for this PR though.
r? `@cjgillot`
CFI: Fix encode_ty: unexpected Param(B/#1)
Fixes#111510 and complements #106547 by adding support for encoding type parameters and also by transforming trait objects' traits into their identities before emitting type checks.
don't skip inference for type in `offset_of!`
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/111678 by no longer skipping inference on the type in `offset_of!`. Simply erasing the regions the during writeback isn't enough and can cause ICEs. A test case for this is included.
This reverts https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111661, because it becomes redundant, since inference already erases the regions.
Fix local libs not included when printing native static libs
This PR fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/111643 by adding the local used libs to the printed `--print=native-static-libs` output.
It seems that `--print=native-static-libs` doesn't have any test, so I added one. It's very simple and doesn't even tries to compile the result to a binary as I don't know how to handle external library linking in CI. (Note that https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/tests/run-make/staticlib-dylib-linkage/Makefile does compile to a binary)
r? `@bjorn3`
We've done measurements with Miri and have determined that `noalias` shouldn't
break code. The requirements that allow us to add dereferenceable and align
have been long documented in the standard library documentation.
LLVM can make use of the `noalias` parameter attribute on the parameter to
`drop_in_place` in areas like argument promotion. Because the Rust compiler
fully controls the code for `drop_in_place`, it can soundly deduce parameter
attributes on it. In the case of a value that has a programmer-defined Drop
implementation, we know that the first thing `drop_in_place` will do is pass a
pointer to the object to `Drop::drop`. `Drop::drop` takes `&mut`, so it must be
guaranteed that there are no pointers to the object upon entering that
function. Therefore, it should be safe to mark `noalias` there.
With this patch, we mark `noalias` only when the type is a value with a
programmer-defined Drop implementation. This is possibly overly conservative,
but I thought that proceeding cautiously was best in this instance.
