Suggest to specify a target triple when lang item is missing
It is very common for newbies to embedded to hit this confusing error when forgetting to specify the target.
Source: me googling this error many times.
## Possible changes
* We could possibly restrict the note+help to only be included on eh_personality lang item if that helped reduce false positives, but its also possible doing so would just increase false negatives
* Open to any suggestions on rewriting the messages
* We could possibly remove the `.cargo/config` alternative to avoid the message getting too noisy but I think its valuable to have as its the correct approach for most embedded projects so that `cargo build` just works.
r? rust-lang/diagnostics
manually implement `Hash` for `DefId`
This might speed up hashing for hashers that can work on individual u64s. Just as an experiment, suggested in a reddit thread on `FxHasher`. cc `@nnethercote`
Note that this should not be merged as is without cfg-ing the code path for 64 bits.
This crate actually had a typo `'ctx` in one of its functions:
```diff
-pub fn same_type_modulo_infer(a: Ty<'tcx>, b: Ty<'ctx>) -> bool {
+pub fn same_type_modulo_infer<'tcx>(a: Ty<'tcx>, b: Ty<'tcx>) -> bool {
```
This reverts commit b376f5621b, which is
the main part of #90499, because it turns out that this causes a good
amount of breakage in crates relying on the old behavior.
Fixes#91372.
GATs outlives lint: Try to prove bounds
Fixes#91036Fixes#90888Fixes#91348 (better error + documentation to be added to linked issue)
Instead of checking for bounds directly, try to prove them in the associated type environment.
Also, add a bit of extra information to the error, including a link to the relevant discussion issue (#87479). That should be edited to include a brief summary of the current state of the outlives lint, including a brief background. It also might or might not be worth it to bump this to a full error code at some point.
r? ``@nikomatsakis``
Use module inline assembly to embed bitcode
In LLVM 14, our current method of setting section flags to avoid
embedding the `.llvmbc` section into final compilation artifacts
will no longer work, see issue #90326. The upstream recommendation
is to instead embed the entire bitcode using module-level inline
assembly, which is what this change does.
I've kept the existing code for platforms where we do not need to
set section flags, but possibly we should always be using the
inline asm approach (which would have to look a bit different for MachO).
r? `@nagisa`
