use if let instead of single match arm expressions
use if let instead of single match arm expressions to compact code and reduce nesting (clippy::single_match)
Use const-checking to forbid use of unstable features in const-stable functions
First step towards #76618.
Currently this code isn't ever hit because `qualify_min_const_fn` runs first and catches pretty much everything. One exception is `const_precise_live_drops`, which does not use the newly added code since it runs as part of a separate pass.
Also contains some unrelated refactoring, which is split into separate commits.
r? @oli-obk
New MIR optimization pass to reduce branches on match of tuples of enums
Fixes#68867 by adding a new pass that turns something like
```rust
let x: Option<()>;
let y: Option<()>;
match (x,y) {
(Some(_), Some(_)) => {0},
_ => {1}
}
```
into something like
```rust
let x: Option<()>;
let y: Option<()>;
let discriminant_x = // get discriminant of x
let discriminant_y = // get discriminant of x
if discriminant_x != discriminant_y {1} else {0}
```
The opt-diffs still have the old basic blocks like
```
bb3: {
_8 = discriminant((*(_4.1: &ViewportPercentageLength))); // scope 0 at $DIR/early-otherwise-branch-68867.rs:21:21: 21:30
switchInt(move _8) -> [1_isize: bb7, otherwise: bb2]; // scope 0 at $DIR/early-otherwise-branch-68867.rs:21:21: 21:30
}
bb4: {
_9 = discriminant((*(_4.1: &ViewportPercentageLength))); // scope 0 at $DIR/early-otherwise-branch-68867.rs:22:23: 22:34
switchInt(move _9) -> [2_isize: bb8, otherwise: bb2]; // scope 0 at $DIR/early-otherwise-branch-68867.rs:22:23: 22:34
}
bb5: {
_10 = discriminant((*(_4.1: &ViewportPercentageLength))); // scope 0 at $DIR/early-otherwise-branch-68867.rs:23:23: 23:34
switchInt(move _10) -> [3_isize: bb9, otherwise: bb2]; // scope 0 at $DIR/early-otherwise-branch-68867.rs:23:23: 23:34
}
```
These do get removed on later passes. I'm not sure if I should include those passes in the test to make it clear?
Some promotion cleanup
Based on top of both https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/75502 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/75585, this does some cleanup of the promotion code. The last 2 commits are new.
* Remove the remaining cases where `const fn` is treated different from `fn`. This means no longer promoting ptr-to-int casts, raw ptr operations, and union field accesses in `const fn` -- or anywhere, for that matter. These are all unstable in const-context so this should not break any stable code. Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/75586.
* ~~Promote references to statics even outside statics (i.e., in functions) for consistency.~~
* Promote `&mut []` everywhere, not just in non-`const` functions, for consistency.
* Explain why we do not promote deref's of statics outside statics. ~~(This is the only remaining direct user of `const_kind`.)~~
This can only land once the other two PRs land; I am mostly putting this up already because I couldn't wait ;) and to get some feedback from `@rust-lang/wg-const-eval` .
Implement a generic Destination Propagation optimization on MIR
This takes the work that was originally started by `@eddyb` in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/47954, and then explored by me in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/71003, and implements it in a general (ie. not limited to acyclic CFGs) and dataflow-driven way (so that no additional infrastructure in rustc is needed).
The pass is configured to run at `mir-opt-level=2` and higher only. To enable it by default, some followup work on it is still needed:
* Performance needs to be evaluated. I did some light optimization work and tested against `tuple-stress`, which caused trouble in my last attempt, but didn't go much in depth here.
* We can also enable the pass only at `opt-level=2` and higher, if it is too slow to run in debug mode, but fine when optimizations run anyways.
* Debuginfo needs to be fixed after locals are merged. I did not look into what is required for this.
* Live ranges of locals (aka `StorageLive` and `StorageDead`) are currently deleted. We either need to decide that this is fine, or if not, merge the variable's live ranges (or remove these statements entirely – https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/68622).
Some benchmarks of the pass were done in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/72635.
Some MIR statements and terminators have an (undocumented...) invariant
that some of their input and outputs must not overlap. This records
conflicts between locals used in these positions.
