Turns out, this has some really bad perf implications in large types (issue #88862). While we technically can handle them fine, it doesn't change test output either way. For now, revert with an added benchmark. Future attempts to change this back will have to consider perf.
Previously, we would 'forget' that we had `'static` regions in some
place during trait evaluation. This lead to us producing
`EvaluatedToOkModuloRegions` when we could have produced
`EvaluatedToOk`, causing us to perform unnecessary work.
This PR preserves `'static` regions when we canonicalize a predicate for
`evaluate_obligation`, and when we 'freshen' a predicate during trait
evaluation. Thie ensures that evaluating a predicate containing
`'static` regions can produce `EvaluatedToOk` (assuming that we
don't end up introducing any region dependencies during evaluation).
Building off of this improved caching, we use
`predicate_must_hold_considering_regions` during fulfillment of
projection predicates to see if we can skip performing additional work.
We already do this for trait predicates, but doing this for projection
predicates lead to mixed performance results without the above caching
improvements.
normalize mir::Constant differently from ty::Const in preparation for valtrees
Valtrees are unable to represent many kind of constant values (this is on purpose). For constants that are used at runtime, we do not need a valtree representation and can thus use a different form of evaluation. In order to make this explicit and less fragile, I added a `fold_constant` method to `TypeFolder` and implemented it for normalization. Normalization can now, when it wants to eagerly evaluate a constant, normalize `mir::Constant` directly into a `mir::ConstantKind::Val` instead of relying on the `ty::Const` evaluation.
In the future we can get rid of the `ty::Const` in there entirely and add our own `Unevaluated` variant to `mir::ConstantKind`. This would allow us to remove the `promoted` field from `ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated`, as promoteds can never occur in the type system.
cc `@rust-lang/wg-const-eval`
r? `@lcnr`
Found with https://github.com/est31/warnalyzer.
Dubious changes:
- Is anyone else using rustc_apfloat? I feel weird completely deleting
x87 support.
- Maybe some of the dead code in rustc_data_structures, in case someone
wants to use it in the future?
- Don't change rustc_serialize
I plan to scrap most of the json module in the near future (see
https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/418) and fixing the
tests needed more work than I expected.
TODO: check if any of the comments on the deleted code should be kept.
type is too big -> values of the type are too big
strictly speaking, `[u8; usize::MAX]` or even `[[[u128; usize::MAX]; usize::MAX]; usize::MAX]` are absolutely fine types as long as you don't try to deal with any values of it.
This error message seems to cause some confusion imo, for example in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/79135#issuecomment-729361380 so I would prefer us to be more precise here.
See the added test case which uses one of these types without causing an error.
r? ``@oli-obk``
Replace tuple of infer vars for upvar_tys with single infer var
This commit allows us to decide the number of captures required after
completing capture ananysis, which is required as part of implementing
RFC-2229.
closes https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/4
r? `@nikomatsakis`
This commit allows us to decide the number of captures required after
completing capture ananysis, which is required as part of implementing
RFC-2229.
Co-authored-by: Aman Arora <me@aman-arora.com>
Co-authored-by: Jenny Wills <wills.jenniferg@gmail.com>
