When we encounter a situation where we'd suggest `pin!()`, we now account for that expression exising as part of an assignment and provide an appropriate suggestion:
```
error[E0599]: no method named `poll` found for type parameter `F` in the current scope
--> $DIR/pin-needed-to-poll-3.rs:19:28
|
LL | impl<F> Future for FutureWrapper<F>
| - method `poll` not found for this type parameter
...
LL | let res = self.fut.poll(cx);
| ^^^^ method not found in `F`
|
help: consider pinning the expression
|
LL ~ let mut pinned = std::pin::pin!(self.fut);
LL ~ let res = pinned.as_mut().poll(cx);
|
```
Fix#125661.
The following suggestion is incorrect, as it doesn't account for the binding:
```
error[E0599]: no method named `poll` found for type parameter `F` in the current scope
--> $DIR/pin-needed-to-poll-3.rs:19:28
|
LL | impl<F> Future for FutureWrapper<F>
| - method `poll` not found for this type parameter
...
LL | let res = self.fut.poll(cx);
| ^^^^ method not found in `F`
|
help: consider pinning the expression
|
LL ~ let res = let mut pinned = std::pin::pin!(self.fut);
LL ~ pinned.as_mut().poll(cx);
|
```
NVPTX: Avoid PassMode::Direct for args in C abi
Fixes#117480
I must admit that I'm confused about `PassMode` altogether, is there a good sum-up threads for this anywhere? I'm especially confused about how "indirect" and "byval" goes together. To me it seems like "indirect" basically means "use a indirection through a pointer", while "byval" basically means "do not use indirection through a pointer".
The return used to keep `PassMode::Direct` for small aggregates. It turns out that `make_indirect` messes up the tests and one way to fix it is to keep `PassMode::Direct` for all aggregates. I have mostly seen this PassMode mentioned for args. Is it also a problem for returns? When experimenting with `byval` as an alternative i ran into [this assert](61a3eea804/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/abi.rs (L463C22-L463C22))
I have added tests for the same kind of types that is already tested for the "ptx-kernel" abi. The tests cannot be enabled until something like #117458 is completed and merged.
CC: ``@RalfJung`` since you seem to be the expert on this and have already helped me out tremendously
CC: ``@RDambrosio016`` in case this influence your work on `rustc_codegen_nvvm`
``@rustbot`` label +O-NVPTX
Omit non-needs_drop drop_in_place in vtables
This replaces the drop_in_place reference with null in vtables. On librustc_driver.so, this drops about ~17k (11%) dynamic relocations from the output, since many vtables can now be placed in read-only memory, rather than having a relocated pointer included.
This makes a tradeoff by adding a null check at vtable call sites. I'm not sure that's readily avoidable without changing the vtable format (e.g., so that we can use a pc-relative relocation instead of an absolute address, and avoid the dynamic relocation that way). But it seems likely that the check is cheap at runtime.
Accepted MCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/730
When encountering `use foo::*;` where `foo` fails to be found, and we later
encounter resolution errors, we silence those later errors.
A single case of the above, for an *existing* import on a big codebase would
otherwise have a huge number of knock-down spurious errors.
Ideally, instead of a global flag to silence all subsequent resolve errors,
we'd want to introduce an unameable binding in the appropriate rib as a
sentinel when there's a failed glob import, so when we encounter a resolve
error we can search for that sentinel and if found, and only then, silence
that error. The current approach is just a quick proof of concept to
iterate over.
Partially address #96799.
This adds the `only-apple`/`ignore-apple` compiletest directive, and
uses that basically everywhere instead of `only-macos`/`ignore-macos`.
Some of the updates in `run-make` are a bit redundant, as they use
`ignore-cross-compile` and won't run on iOS - but using Apple in these
is still more correct, so I've made that change anyhow.
`-Znext-solver`: eagerly normalize when adding goals
fixes#125269. I am not totally with this fix and going to keep this open until we have a more general discussion about how to handle hangs caused by lazy norm in the new solver.
We still check for the `rental`/`allsorts-rental` crates. But now if
they are detected we just emit a fatal error, instead of emitting a
warning and providing alternative behaviour.
The original "hack" implementing alternative behaviour was added
in #73345.
The lint was added in #83127.
The tracking issue is #83125.
The direct motivation for the change is that providing the alternative
behaviour is interfering with #125174 and follow-on work.
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #125339 (The number of tests does not depend on the architecture's pointer width)
- #125542 (Migrate rustdoc verify output files)
- #125616 (MIR validation: ensure that downcast projection is followed by field projection)
- #125625 (Use grep to implement verify-line-endings)
Failed merges:
- #125573 (Migrate `run-make/allow-warnings-cmdline-stability` to `rmake.rs`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
This replaces the drop_in_place reference with null in vtables. On
librustc_driver.so, this drops about ~17k dynamic relocations from the
output, since many vtables can now be placed in read-only memory, rather
than having a relocated pointer included.
This makes a tradeoff by adding a null check at vtable call sites.
That's hard to avoid without changing the vtable format (e.g., to use a
pc-relative relocation instead of an absolute address, and avoid the
dynamic relocation that way). But it seems likely that the check is
cheap at runtime.
rustdoc: Clarify const-stability with regard to normal stability
Fixes#125511.
- Elide const-unstable if also unstable overall
- Show "const" for const-unstable if also overall unstable
drop region constraints for ambiguous goals
See the comment in `compute_external_query_constraints`. While the underlying issue is preexisting, this fixes a bug introduced by #125343.
It slightly weakens the leak chec, even if we didn't have any test which was affected. I want to write such a test before merging this PR.
r? `@compiler-errors`
