Cleanup and improve `--check-cfg` implementation
This PR removes some indentation in the code, as well as preventing some bugs/misusages and fix a nit in the doc.
r? ```@petrochenkov``` (maybe)
When encountering sealed traits, point types that implement it
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `S: d::Hidden` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/sealed-trait-local.rs:53:20
|
LL | impl c::Sealed for S {}
| ^ the trait `d::Hidden` is not implemented for `S`
|
note: required by a bound in `c::Sealed`
--> $DIR/sealed-trait-local.rs:17:23
|
LL | pub trait Sealed: self::d::Hidden {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `Sealed`
= note: `Sealed` is a "sealed trait", because to implement it you also need to implement `c::d::Hidden`, which is not accessible; this is usually done to force you to use one of the provided types that already implement it
= help: the following types implement the trait:
- c::X
- c::Y
```
The last `help` is new.
Despite what I claimed in an earlier commit, the ordering does matter to
some degree. Using `FxIndexSet` prevents changes to the error message
order in `tests/ui/check-cfg/mix.rs`.
`parse_cfgspecs` and `parse_check_cfg` run very early, before the main
interner is running. They each use a short-lived interner and convert
all interned symbols to strings in their output data structures. Once
the main interner starts up, these data structures get converted into
new data structures that are identical except with the strings converted
to symbols.
All is not obvious from the current code, which is a mess, particularly
with inconsistent naming that obscures the parallel string/symbol data
structures. This commit clean things up a lot.
- The existing `CheckCfg` type is generic, allowing both
`CheckCfg<String>` and `CheckCfg<Symbol>` forms. This is really
useful, but it defaults to `String`. The commit removes the default so
we have to use `CheckCfg<String>` and `CheckCfg<Symbol>` explicitly,
which makes things clearer.
- Introduces `Cfg`, which is generic over `String` and `Symbol`, similar
to `CheckCfg`.
- Renames some things.
- `parse_cfgspecs` -> `parse_cfg`
- `CfgSpecs` -> `Cfg<String>`, plus it's used in more places, rather
than the underlying `FxHashSet` type.
- `CrateConfig` -> `Cfg<Symbol>`.
- `CrateCheckConfig` -> `CheckCfg<Symbol>`
- Adds some comments explaining the string-to-symbol conversions.
- `to_crate_check_config`, which converts `CheckCfg<String>` to
`CheckCfg<Symbol>`, is inlined and removed and combined with the
overly-general `CheckCfg::map_data` to produce
`CheckCfg::<String>::intern`.
- `build_configuration` now does the `Cfg<String>`-to-`Cfg<Symbol>`
conversion, so callers don't need to, which removes the need for
`to_crate_config`.
The diff for two of the fields in `Config` is a good example of the
improved clarity:
```
- pub crate_cfg: FxHashSet<(String, Option<String>)>,
- pub crate_check_cfg: CheckCfg,
+ pub crate_cfg: Cfg<String>,
+ pub crate_check_cfg: CheckCfg<String>,
```
Compare that with the diff for the corresponding fields in `ParseSess`,
and the relationship to `Config` is much clearer than before:
```
- pub config: CrateConfig,
- pub check_config: CrateCheckConfig,
+ pub config: Cfg<Symbol>,
+ pub check_config: CheckCfg<Symbol>,
```
In `parse_cfg`, we now construct a `FxHashSet<String>` directly instead of
constructing a `FxHashSet<Symbol>` and then immediately converting it to a
`FxHashSet<String>`(!)
(The type names made this behaviour non-obvious. The next commit will
make the type names clearer.)
In `test_edition_parsing`, change the
`build_session_options_and_crate_config` call to
`build_session_options`, because the config isn't used.
That leaves a single call site for
`build_session_options_and_crate_config`, so just inline and remove it.
Allow partially moved values in match
This PR attempts to unify the behaviour between `let _ = PLACE`, `let _: TY = PLACE;` and `match PLACE { _ => {} }`.
The logical conclusion is that the `match` version should not check for uninitialised places nor check that borrows are still live.
The `match PLACE {}` case is handled by keeping a `FakeRead` in the unreachable fallback case to verify that `PLACE` has a legal value.
Schematically, `match PLACE { arms }` in surface rust becomes in MIR:
```rust
PlaceMention(PLACE)
match PLACE {
// Decision tree for the explicit arms
arms,
// An extra fallback arm
_ => {
FakeRead(ForMatchedPlace, PLACE);
unreachable
}
}
```
`match *borrow { _ => {} }` continues to check that `*borrow` is live, but does not read the value.
`match *borrow {}` both checks that `*borrow` is live, and fake-reads the value.
Continuation of ~https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/102256~ ~https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104844~
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99180https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53114
NVPTX: Allow PassMode::Direct for ptx kernels for now
Upgrading the nvptx toolchain to the newest nightly makes it hit the assert that links to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/115666
It seems like most targets get around this by using `PassMode::Indirect`. That is impossible for the kernel as it's not a normal call, but instead the arguments are copied from CPU to GPU and the passed pointer would be invalid when it reached the GPU.
I also made an experiment with `PassMode::Cast` but at least the most simple version of this broke the assembly API tests.
I added fixing the pass mode in my unofficial tracking issue list (I do not have the necessary permissions to update to official one). https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/38788#issuecomment-1079021853
Since the ptx_abi is currently unstable and have been working with `PassMode::Direct` for more than a year now, the steps above is hopefully sufficient to enable it as an exception until I can prioritize to fix it. I'm currently looking at steps to enable the CI for nvptx64 again and would prefer to finish that first.
Fix ICE: Restrict param constraint suggestion
When encountering an associated item with a type param that could be constrained, do not look at the parent item if the type param comes from the associated item.
Fix#117209, fix#89868.
Properly restore snapshot when failing to recover parsing ternary
If the recovery parsed an expression, then failed to eat a `:`, it would return `false` without restoring the snapshot. Fix this by always restoring the snapshot when returning `false`.
Draft for now because I'd like to try and improve this recovery further.
Fixes#117208
Remove `rustc_symbol_mangling/messages.ftl`.
It contains a single message that (a) doesn't contain any natural language, and (b) is only used in tests.
r? `@davidtwco`
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `S: d::Hidden` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/sealed-trait-local.rs:53:20
|
LL | impl c::Sealed for S {}
| ^ the trait `d::Hidden` is not implemented for `S`
|
note: required by a bound in `c::Sealed`
--> $DIR/sealed-trait-local.rs:17:23
|
LL | pub trait Sealed: self::d::Hidden {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ required by this bound in `Sealed`
= note: `Sealed` is a "sealed trait", because to implement it you also need to implement `c::d::Hidden`, which is not accessible; this is usually done to force you to use one of the provided types that already implement it
= help: the following types implement the trait:
- c::X
- c::Y
```
The last `help` is new.
When encountering
```rust
foo()
*bar = baz;
```
We currently emit potentially two errors, one for the return type of
`foo` not being multiplyiable by the type of `bar`, and another for
`foo() * bar` not being assignable.
We now check for this case and suggest adding a semicolon in the right
place.
Fix#80446.
Only call `mir_const_qualif` if absolutely necessary
Pull the perf change out of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113617
This should not have any impact on behaviour (if it does, we'll see an ICE)
Lint overlapping ranges as a separate pass
This reworks the [`overlapping_range_endpoints`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/beta/nightly-rustc/rustc_lint_defs/builtin/static.OVERLAPPING_RANGE_ENDPOINTS.html) lint. My motivations are:
- It was annoying to have this lint entangled with the exhaustiveness algorithm, especially wrt librarification;
- This makes the lint behave consistently.
Here's the consistency story. Take the following matches:
```rust
match (0u8, true) {
(0..=10, true) => {}
(10..20, true) => {}
(10..20, false) => {}
_ => {}
}
match (true, 0u8) {
(true, 0..=10) => {}
(true, 10..20) => {}
(false, 10..20) => {}
_ => {}
}
```
There are two semantically consistent options: option 1 we lint all overlaps between the ranges, option 2 we only lint the overlaps that could actually occur (i.e. the ones with `true`). Option 1 is what this PR does. Option 2 is possible but would require the exhaustiveness algorithm to track more things for the sake of the lint. The status quo is that we're inconsistent between the two.
Option 1 generates more false postives, but I prefer it from a maintainer's perspective. I do think the difference is minimal; cases where the difference is observable seem rare.
This PR adds a separate pass, so this will have a perf impact. Let's see how bad, it looked ok locally.
