Update `error [E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` to be more clear
This updates the error message `error[E0449]: unnecessary visibility qualifier` by clearly indicating that visibility qualifiers already inherit their visibility from a parent item. The error message previously implied that the qualifiers were permitted, which is not the case anymore.
Resolves#109822.
Add support for RISC-V relax target feature
This adds `relax` as an allowed RISC-V target feature. The relax feature in LLVM enables [linker relaxation](https://www.sifive.com/blog/all-aboard-part-3-linker-relaxation-in-riscv-toolchain), an optimization specific to RISC-V that allows global variable accesses to be resolved by the linker by using the global pointer (`gp`) register (rather than constructing the addresses from scratch for each access). Enabling `relax` will cause LLVM to emit relocations in the object file that support this. The feature can be enabled in rustc with `-C target-feature=+relax`.
Currently this feature is disabled by default, but maybe it should be enabled by default since it is an easy performance improvement (but requires the `gp` register to be set up properly). GCC/Clang enable this feature by default (for both hosted/bare-metal targets), and include the `-mno-relax` flag to disable it (see [here](466d554dca/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/RISCV.cpp (L145)) for the code that enables it in Clang). I think it would make sense to enable by default, at least for all hosted targets since the `gp` register should be automatically set up by the runtime. For bare-metal targets, `gp` must be set up manually, so it is probably best to leave off by default to avoid breaking existing applications that do not set up `gp`. Leaving it disabled by default for all targets is also reasonable though.
Let me know your thoughts. Thanks!
Fixes#109426.
We store argument indexes on VarDebugInfo. Unlike the previous method of
relying on the variable index to know whether a variable is an argument,
this survives MIR inlining.
We also no longer check if var.source_info.scope is the outermost scope.
When a function gets inlined, the arguments to the inner function will
no longer be in the outermost scope. What we care about though is
whether they were in the outermost scope prior to inlining, which we
know by whether we assigned an argument index.
rustc_middle: Document which exactly `DefId`s don't have `DefKind`s
I don't currently have time to investigate when and how to create these missing HIR nodes, but if someone else could do that it would be great.
Add suggestion to remove `derive()` if invoked macro is non-derive
Adds to the existing `expected derive macro, found {}` error message:
```
help: remove the surrounding "derive()":
--> $DIR/macro-path-prelude-fail-4.rs:1:3
|
LL | #[derive(inline)]
| ^^^^^^^ ^
```
This suggestion will either fix the issue, in the case that the macro was valid, or provide a better error message if not
Not ready for merge yet, as the highlighted span is only valid for trivial formatting. Is there a nice way to get the parent span of the macro path within `smart_resolve_macro_path`?
Closes#109589
Fix a couple ICEs in the new `CastKind::Transmute` code
Check the sizes of the immediates, rather than the overall types, when deciding whether we can convert types without going through memory.
Fixes#110005Fixes#109992Fixes#110032
cc `@matthiaskrgr`
Migrate remainder of rustc_ty_utils to `SessionDiagnostic`
This moves the remaining errors in `rust_ty_utils` to `SessionsDiagnostic`.
r? ``@davidtwco``
Instantiate instead of erasing binder when probing param methods
Fixes#108836
There is a really old comment saying that a `WhereClauseCandidate` probe candidate "should not contain any inference variables", but I'm not really confident that that comment applies anymore. In contrast, other candidates that we assemble during method probe contain inference variables in their substitutions (e.g. `InherentImplCandidate`)...
Since this change is made only to support a nightly feature, I'm happy to gate the new behavior behind this feature flag or discuss it further.
r? types
The shadowing lead to an incorrect comparison. Rename it and compare it
properly. compiler-errors told me that I should just include the fix
here without a test.
Better diagnostic when pattern matching tuple structs
Fixes#108284
When trying to pattern match a tuple struct we might get a flawed error message if there are missing fields. E.g.
```
let x = Foo(100, 200);
if let Foo { 0: bar } = x { ... }
```
Produces this error:
```
error[E0769]: tuple variant `Foo` written as struct variant
--> hello.rs:5:12
|
5 | if let Foo { 0: foo } = x {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
help: use the tuple variant pattern syntax instead
|
5 | if let Foo(_, _) = x {
| ~~~~~~
```
Which doesn't highlight that we can still use the struct syntax but we need to fill missing fields. This pr changes this error to:
```
error[E0027]: pattern does not mention field `1`
--> hello.rs:5:12
|
5 | if let Foo { 0: foo } = x {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ missing field `1`
|
help: include the missing field in the pattern
|
5 | if let Foo { 0: foo, 1: _ } = x {
| ~~~~~~~~
help: if you don't care about this missing field, you can explicitly ignore it
|
5 | if let Foo { 0: foo, .. } = x {
| ~~~~~~
```
