* Add UI tests with macros for the `expect` attribute (RFC-2383)
* Addressed review comments - mostly UI test updates (RFC-2383)
* Documented lint level attribute on macro not working bug (RFC-2383)
See `rust#87391`
Remove LLVM attribute removal
This was necessary before, because `declare_raw_fn` would always apply
the default optimization attributes to every declared function.
Then `attributes::from_fn_attrs` would have to remove the default
attributes in the case of, e.g. `#[optimize(speed)]` in a `-Os` build.
(see [`src/test/codegen/optimize-attr-1.rs`](03a8cc7df1/src/test/codegen/optimize-attr-1.rs (L33)))
However, every relevant callsite of `declare_raw_fn` (i.e. where we
actually generate code for the function, and not e.g. a call to an
intrinsic, where optimization attributes don't [?] matter)
calls `from_fn_attrs`, so we can remove the attribute setting
from `declare_raw_fn`, and rely on `from_fn_attrs` to apply the correct
attributes all at once.
r? `@ghost` (blocked on #94221)
`@rustbot` label S-blocked
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #94464 (Suggest adding a new lifetime parameter when two elided lifetimes should match up for traits and impls.)
- #94476 (7 - Make more use of `let_chains`)
- #94478 (Fix panic when handling intra doc links generated from macro)
- #94482 (compiler: fix some typos)
- #94490 (Update books)
- #94496 (tests: accept llvm intrinsic in align-checking test)
- #94498 (9 - Make more use of `let_chains`)
- #94503 (Provide C FFI types via core::ffi, not just in std)
- #94513 (update Miri)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Suggest adding a new lifetime parameter when two elided lifetimes should match up for traits and impls.
Suggest adding a new lifetime parameter when two elided lifetimes should match up for functions in traits and impls.
Issue #94462
Direct users towards using Rust target feature names in CLI
This PR consists of a couple of changes on how we handle target features.
In particular there is a bug-fix wherein we avoid passing through features that aren't prefixed by `+` or `-` to LLVM. These appear to be causing LLVM to assert, which is pretty poor a behaviour (and also makes it pretty clear we expect feature names to be prefixed).
The other commit, I anticipate to be somewhat more controversial is outputting a warning when users specify a LLVM-specific, or otherwise unknown, feature name on the CLI. In those situations we request users to either replace it with a known Rust feature name (e.g. `bmi` -> `bmi1`) or file a feature request. I've a couple motivations for this: first of all, if users are specifying these features on the command line, I'm pretty confident there is also a need for these features to be usable via `#[cfg(target_feature)]` machinery. And second, we're growing a fair number of backends recently and having ability to provide some sort of unified-ish interface in this place seems pretty useful to me.
Sponsored by: standard.ai
In `CodegenUnit::items_in_deterministic_order`, there's a comment that
only local HirIds should be taken into account, but #90408 removed the
`as_local` call that sets others to None. Restoring that check fixes the
s390x hangs seen in [RHBZ 2058803].
[RHBZ 2058803]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058803
Previously we've only suggested adding `Copy` bounds when the type being
moved/copied is a type parameter (generic). With this commit we also
suggest adding bounds when a type
- Can be copy
- All predicates that need to be satisfied for that are based on type
params
i.e. we will suggest `T: Copy` for `Option<T>`, but won't suggest
anything for `Option<String>`.
Future work: it would be nice to also suggest adding `.clone()` calls
Rollup of 3 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #94359 (Fix inconsistent symbol mangling of integers constants with -Zverbose)
- #94465 (6 - Make more use of `let_chains`)
- #94470 (⬆️ rust-analyzer)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Fix inconsistent symbol mangling of integers constants with -Zverbose
The `PrettyPrinter` changes formatting of array size and integer
constants based on `-Zverbose`, so its implementation cannot be used in
legacy symbol mangling.
Example symbol demangling before changes:
```console
$ cat a.rs
pub struct A<T>(T);
impl A<[u8; 128]> { pub fn f() {} }
$ rustc --crate-type=lib a.rs -Zverbose=n && nm -C ./liba.rlib
00000000 T a::A<[u8; 128]>::f
$ rustc --crate-type=lib a.rs -Zverbose=y && nm -C ./liba.rlib
00000000 T a::A<[u8; Const { ty. usize, val. Value(Scalar(0x0000000000000080)) }]>::f
```
Add `rustc_middle::ty::suggest_constraining_type_params` that suggests
adding multiple constraints.
`suggest_constraining_type_param` now just forwards params to this new
function.
Check method input expressions once
If the user mistakenly forgets to wrap their method args in a tuple, then the compiler tries to check that types within the tuple match the expression args. This means we call `check_expr` once within this diagnostic code, so when we check the expr once again in `demand_compatible`, we attempt to apply expr adjustments twice, leading to ICEs.
This PR attempts to fix this by skipping the expression type check in `demand_compatible` if we have detected an method arg mismatch at all.
This does lead to a single UI test regressing slightly, due to a diagnostic disappearing, though I don't know if it is generally meaningful to even raise an type error after noting that the argument count is incorrect in a function call, since the user might be providing (in-context) meaningless expressions to the wrong method.
I can adjust this to be a bit more targeted (to just skip checking exprs in `demand_compatible` in the tuple case) if this UI test regression is a problem.
fixes#94334
cc #94291
Also drive-by fixup of `.node_type(expr.hir_id)` to `.expr_ty(expr)`, since that method exists.
Lint against more useless `#[must_use]` attributes
This expands the existing `#[must_use]` check in `unused_attributes` to lint against pretty much everything `#[must_use]` doesn't support.
Fixes#93906.
Generalize "remove `&`" and "add `*`" suggestions to more than one deref
Suggest removing more than one `&` and `&mut`, along with suggesting adding more than one `*` (or a combination of the two).
r? `@estebank`
(since you're experienced with these types of suggestions, feel free to reassign)
If they are trying to use features rustc doesn't yet know about,
request a feature request.
Additionally, also warn against using feature names without leading `+`
or `-` signs.
