Support AVR for inline asm!
A first pass at support for the AVR platform in inline `asm!`. Passes the initial compiler tests, have not yet done more complete verification.
In particular, the register classes could use a lot more fleshing out, this draft PR so far only includes the most basic.
cc `@Amanieu` `@dylanmckay`
Remove a dead code path.
It is neither documented nor can I see any way it could ever be reached.
Also, no tests fail when turning that arm into an ICE
Fix AnonConst ICE
I am not sure if this is even the correct place to fix this issue, but i went down the path where the generic args came from and i wasn't able to find a clear cause for this down there. But if anybody has a suggestion what i should do, just tell me.
This fixes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91267
We already use the object crate for generating uncompressed .rmeta
metadata object files. This switches the generation of compressed
.rustc object files to use the object crate as well. These have
slightly different requirements in that .rmeta should be completely
excluded from any final compilation artifacts, while .rustc should
be part of shared objects, but not loaded into memory.
The primary motivation for this change is #90326: In LLVM 14, the
current way of setting section flags (and in particular, preventing
the setting of SHF_ALLOC) will no longer work. There are other ways
we could work around this, but switching to the object crate seems
like the most elegant, as we already use it for .rmeta, and as it
makes this independent of the codegen backend. In particular, we
don't need separate handling in codegen_llvm and codegen_gcc.
codegen_cranelift should be able to reuse the implementation as
well, though I have omitted that here, as it is not based on
codegen_ssa.
This change mostly extracts the existing code for .rmeta handling
to allow using it for .rustc as well, and adjust the codegen
infrastructure to handle the metadata object file separately: We
no longer create a backend-specific module for it, and directly
produce the compiled module instead.
This does not fix#90326 by itself yet, as .llvmbc will need to be
handled separately.
When we point at a binding to suggest giving it a type, erase all the
type for ADTs that have been resolved, leaving only the ones that could
not be inferred. For small shallow types this is not a problem, but for
big nested types with lots of params, this can otherwise cause a lot of
unnecessary visual output.
This largely avoids remapping from and to the 'real' indices, with the exception
of predecessor lookup and the final merge back, and is conceptually better.
As the paper indicates, the unprocessed vertices in the DFS tree and processed
vertices are disjoint, and we can use them in the same space, tracking only the index
of the split.
This replaces the previous implementation with the simple variant of
Lengauer-Tarjan, which performs better in the general case. Performance on the
keccak benchmark is about equivalent between the two, but we don't see
regressions (and indeed see improvements) on other benchmarks, even on a
partially optimized implementation.
The implementation here follows that of the pseudocode in "Linear-Time
Algorithms for Dominators and Related Problems" thesis by Loukas Georgiadis. The
next few commits will optimize the implementation as suggested in the thesis.
Several related works are cited in the comments within the implementation, as
well.
Implement the simple Lengauer-Tarjan algorithm
This replaces the previous implementation (from #34169), which has not been
optimized since, with the simple variant of Lengauer-Tarjan which performs
better in the general case. A previous attempt -- not kept in commit history --
attempted a replacement with a bitset-based implementation, but this led to
regressions on perf.rust-lang.org benchmarks and equivalent wins for the keccak
benchmark, so was rejected.
The implementation here follows that of the pseudocode in "Linear-Time
Algorithms for Dominators and Related Problems" thesis by Loukas Georgiadis. The
next few commits will optimize the implementation as suggested in the thesis.
Several related works are cited in the comments within the implementation, as
well.
On the keccak benchmark, we were previously spending 15% of our cycles computing
the NCA / intersect function; this function is quite expensive, especially on
modern CPUs, as it chases pointers on every iteration in a tight loop. With this
commit, we spend ~0.05% of our time in dominator computation.
Also add a test case for inserting a semicolon on extern fns.
Without this fix, we got an error like this:
error: expected one of `->`, `where`, or `{`, found `}`
--> chk.rs:3:1
|
2 | fn foo()
| --- - expected one of `->`, `where`, or `{`
| |
| while parsing this `fn`
3 | }
| ^ unexpected token
Since this is inside an extern block, you're required to write function
prototypes with no body. This fixes a regression, and adds a test case
for it.
since the serialization format isn't self-describing we need a way to detect
when encoder and decoder don't match up. but that doesn't have to
be utf8 validation for strings, which does cost a few % of performance.
Instead we can use a marker byte at the end to be reasonably
sure that we're dealing with a string and it wasn't overwritten in some
way.
Stop enabling `in_band_lifetimes` in rustc_data_structures
There's a conversation started in the tracking issue about possibly unaccepting `in_band_lifetimes`, but it's used heavily in the compiler, and thus there'd need to be a bunch of PRs like this if that were to happen.
So here's one to see how much of an impact it has. For this crate, at least, it doesn't seem like in-band was a big win -- about half the places that were using it didn't even need a named lifetime.
(Oh, and I removed `nll` while I was here too, since it didn't seem needed. Let me know if I should put that back.)
r? `@petrochenkov`
Delete duplicated helpers from HIR printer
These functions (`cbox`, `nbsp`, `word_nbsp`, `head`, `bopen`, `space_if_not_bol`, `break_offset_if_not_bol`, `synth_comment`, `maybe_print_trailing_comment`, `print_remaining_comments`) are duplicated with identical behavior across the AST printer and HIR printer, but are not specific to AST or HIR data structures.
There's a conversation in the tracking issue about possibly unaccepting `in_band_lifetimes`, but it's used heavily in the compiler, and thus there'd need to be a bunch of PRs like this if that were to happen.
So here's one to see how much of an impact it has.
(Oh, and I removed `nll` while I was here too, since it didn't seem needed. Let me know if I should put that back.)
Add support for riscv64gc-unknown-freebsd
For https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/target-tier-policy.html#tier-3-target-policy:
* A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target. (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)
For all Rust targets on FreeBSD, it's [rust@FreeBSD.org](mailto:rust@FreeBSD.org).
* Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust (such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important even for a tier 3 target.
Done.
* Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility. For example, if the name of the target makes people extremely likely to form incorrect beliefs about what it targets, the name should be changed or augmented to disambiguate it.
Done
* Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for Rust developers or users.
Done.
* The target must not introduce license incompatibilities.
Done.
* Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust license (MIT OR Apache-2.0).
Fine with me.
* The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding new license exceptions (as specified by the tidy tool in the rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be subject to any new license requirements.
Done.
* If the target supports building host tools (such as rustc or cargo), those host tools must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries, other than ordinary runtime libraries supplied by the platform and commonly used by other binaries built for the target. For instance, rustc built for the target may depend on a common proprietary C runtime library or console output library, but must not depend on a proprietary code generation library or code optimization library. Rust's license permits such combinations, but the Rust project has no interest in maintaining such combinations within the scope of Rust itself, even at tier 3.
Done.
* Targets should not require proprietary (non-FOSS) components to link a functional binary or library.
Done.
* "onerous" here is an intentionally subjective term. At a minimum, "onerous" legal/licensing terms include but are not limited to: non-disclosure requirements, non-compete requirements, contributor license agreements (CLAs) or equivalent, "non-commercial"/"research-only"/etc terms, requirements conditional on the employer or employment of any particular Rust developers, revocable terms, any requirements that create liability for the Rust project or its developers or users, or any requirements that adversely affect the livelihood or prospects of the Rust project or its developers or users.
Fine with me.
* Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise participate in discussions.
Ok.
* This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements.
Ok.
* Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries as possible and appropriate (core for most targets, alloc for targets that can support dynamic memory allocation, std for targets with an operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3 target not implementing those portions.
std is implemented.
* The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target supports running tests (even if they do not pass), the documentation must explain how to run tests for the target, using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.
Building is possible the same way as other Rust on FreeBSD targets.
* Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular, do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or notifications (via any medium, including via `@)` to a PR author or others involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into such messages.
Ok.
* Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested such notifications.
Ok.
* Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2 or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3 target.
Ok.
* In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets, such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target.
Ok.
compiler/rustc_target: make m68k-unknown-linux-gnu use the gnu base
This makes the m68k arch match the other GNU/Linux based targets by setting the environment to gnu.
