Generator drop tracking: improve break and continue handling
This PR fixes two related issues.
One, sometimes break or continue have a block target instead of an expression target. This seems to mainly happen with try blocks. Since the drop tracking analysis only works on expressions, if we see a block target for break or continue, we substitute the last expression of the block as the target instead.
Two, break and continue were incorrectly being treated as the same, so continue would also show up as an exit from the loop or block. This patch corrects the way continue is handled by keeping a stack of loop entry points and uses those to find the target of the continue.
Fixes#93197
r? `@nikomatsakis`
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D114543 the uwtable attribute gained a flag
so that we can ask for sync uwtables instead of async, as the former are
much cheaper. The default is async, so that's what I've done here, but I
left a TODO that we might be able to do better.
While in here I went ahead and dropped support for removing uwtable
attributes in rustc: we never did it, so I didn't write the extra C++
bridge code to make it work. Maybe I should have done the same thing
with the `sync|async` parameter but we'll see.
i'd guess about 70% of "bad escape" cases occur when someone meant to
use a raw string literal because they're passing it directly to
Regex::new(). this emits an advisory (Applicability::MaybeIncorrect)
help: suggestion to the user that they use an r"" string,
on top of the normal notes about looking at the
string literal documentation/spec.
This change adds a flag for configuring control-flow protection in the
LLVM backend. In Clang, this flag is exposed as `-fcf-protection` with
options `none|branch|return|full`. This convention is followed for
`rustc`, though as a codegen option: `rustc -Z
cf-protection=<none|branch|return|full>`.
Co-authored-by: BlackHoleFox <blackholefoxdev@gmail.com>
This thus still makes it technically possible to enable the feature, and thus
to trigger UB without `unsafe`, but this is fine since incomplete features are
known to be potentially unsound (labelled "may not be safe").
This follows from the discussion at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93176#discussion_r799413561
make `find_similar_impl_candidates` even fuzzier
continues the good work of `@BGR360` in #92223. I might have overshot a bit and we're now slightly too fuzzy 😅
with this we can now also simplify `simplify_type`, which is nice :3
Make `Res::SelfTy` a struct variant and update docs
I found pattern matching on a `(Option<DefId>, Option<(DefId, bool)>)` to not be super readable, additionally the doc comments on the types in a tuple variant aren't visible anywhere at use sites as far as I can tell (using rust analyzer + vscode)
The docs incorrectly assumed that the `DefId` in `Option<(DefId, bool)>` would only ever be for an impl item and I also found the code examples to be somewhat unclear about which `DefId` was being talked about.
r? `@lcnr` since you reviewed the last PR changing these docs
Remove Config::stderr
1. It captured stdout and not stderr
2. It isn't used anywhere
3. All error messages should go to the DiagnosticOutput instead
4. It modifies thread local state
Marking as blocked as it will conflict a bit with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93936.
1. It captured stdout and not stderr
2. It isn't used anywhere
3. All error messages should go to the DiagnosticOutput instead
4. It modifies thread local state
Couple of driver cleanups
* Remove the `RustcDefaultCalls` struct, which hasn't been necessary since the introduction of `rustc_interface`.
* Move the `setup_callbacks` call around for a tiny code deduplication.
* Remove the `SPAN_DEBUG` global as it isn't actually necessary.
Improve chalk integration
- Support subtype bounds in chalk lowering
- Handle universes in canonicalization
- Handle type parameters in chalk responses
- Use `chalk_ir::LifetimeData::Empty` for `ty::ReEmpty`
- Remove `ignore-compare-mode-chalk` for tests that no longer hang (they may still fail or ICE)
This is enough to get a hello world program to compile with `-Zchalk` now. Some of the remaining issues that are needed to get Chalk integration working on larger programs are:
- rust-lang/chalk#234
- rust-lang/chalk#548
- rust-lang/chalk#734
- Generators are handled differently in chalk and rustc
r? `@jackh726`
Apply noundef attribute to &T, &mut T, Box<T>, bool
This doesn't handle `char` because it's a bit awkward to distinguish it from `u32` at this point in codegen.
Note that this _does not_ change whether or not it is UB for `&`, `&mut`, or `Box` to point to undef. It only applies to the pointer itself, not the pointed-to memory.
Fixes (partially) #74378.
r? `@nikic` cc `@RalfJung`
Inherit lifetimes for async fn instead of duplicating them.
The current desugaring of `async fn foo<'a>(&usize) -> &u8` is equivalent to
```rust
fn foo<'a, '0>(&'0 usize) -> foo<'static, 'static>::Opaque<'a, '0, '_>;
type foo<'_a, '_0>::Opaque<'a, '0, '1> = impl Future<Output = &'1 u8>;
```
following the RPIT model.
Duplicating all the inherited lifetime parameters and setting the inherited version to `'static` makes lowering more complex and causes issues like #61949. This PR removes the duplication of inherited lifetimes to directly use
```rust
fn foo<'a, '0>(&'0 usize) -> foo<'a, '0>::Opaque<'_>;
type foo<'a, '0>::Opaque<'1> = impl Future<Output = &'1 u8>;
```
following the TAIT model.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/61949
The only difference between the default and rustc_interface set version
is that the default accesses the source map from SESSION_GLOBALS while
the rustc_interface version accesses the source map from the global
TyCtxt. SESSION_GLOBALS is always set while running the compiler while
the global TyCtxt is not always set. If the global TyCtxt is set, it's
source map is identical to the one in SESSION_GLOBALS
This ensures that it is called even when run_in_thread_pool_with_globals
is avoided and reduces code duplication between the parallel and
non-parallel version of run_in_thread_pool_with_globals
tidy: Extend error code check
We discovered in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93845 that the error code tidy check didn't check everything: if you remove an error code from the listing even if it has an explanation, then it should error.
It also allowed me to put back `E0192` in that listing as well.
r? ```@Mark-Simulacrum```
fix ICE when parsing lifetime as function argument
I don't really like this, but we basically need to emit an error instead of just delaying an bug, because there are too many places in the AST that aren't covered by my previous PRs...
cc: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/93282#issuecomment-1028052945
