Revert non-power-of-two vector restriction
Removes the power of two restriction from rustc. As discussed in https://github.com/rust-lang/stdsimd/issues/63
r? ```@calebzulawski```
cc ```@workingjubilee``` ```@thomcc```
Optimize counting digits in line numbers during error reporting further
This one-ups #82248 by switching the strategy: Instead of dividing the value by 10 repeatedly, we compare with a limit that we multiply by 10 repeatedly. In my benchmarks, this took between 50% and 25% of the original time. The reasons for being faster are:
1. While LLVM is able to replace a division by constant with a multiply + shift, a plain multiplication is still faster. However, this doesn't even factor, because
2. Multiplication, unlike division, is const. We also use a simple for-loop instead of a more complex loop + break, which allows
3. rustc to const-fold the whole loop, and indeed the assembly output simply shows a series of comparisons.
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #80189 (Convert primitives in the standard library to intra-doc links)
- #80874 (Update intra-doc link documentation to match the implementation)
- #82376 (Add option to enable MIR inlining independently of mir-opt-level)
- #82516 (Add incomplete feature gate for inherent associate types.)
- #82579 (Fix turbofish recovery with multiple generic args)
- #82593 (Teach rustdoc how to display WASI.)
- #82597 (Get TyCtxt from self instead of passing as argument in AutoTraitFinder)
- #82627 (Erase late bound regions to avoid ICE)
- #82661 (⬆️ rust-analyzer)
- #82691 (Update books)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Add incomplete feature gate for inherent associate types.
Mentored by ``````@oli-obk``````
So far the only change is that instead of giving an automatic error, the following code compiles:
```rust
struct Foo;
impl Foo {
type Bar = isize;
}
```
The backend work to make it actually usable isn't there yet. In particular, this:
```rust
let x : Foo::Bar;
```
will give you:
```sh
error[E0223]: ambiguous associated type
--> /$RUSTC_DIR/src/test/ui/assoc-inherent.rs:15:13
|
LL | let x : Foo::Bar;
| ^^^^^^^^ help: use fully-qualified syntax: `<Foo as Trait>::Bar`
```
Add option to enable MIR inlining independently of mir-opt-level
Add `-Zinline-mir` option that enables MIR inlining independently of the
current MIR opt level. The primary use-case is enabling MIR inlining on the
default MIR opt level.
Turn inlining thresholds into optional values to make it possible to configure
different defaults depending on the current mir-opt-level (although thresholds
are yet to be used in such a manner).
Remove an old FIXME comment and inline attribute
Apparently #35870 caused a problem in this code (which originally
returned an impl trait) and `#[inline]` was added as a workaround, in
ade79d7609.
The issue is now fixed and the comment and `#[inline]` can now be
removed.
Note that the FIXME was removed because this can't be fixed,
`register_renamed` calls LintId::of and there's no LintId for rustdoc
lints when rustc is running.
- Move MISSING_CRATE_LEVEL_DOCS to rustdoc directly
- Update documentation
This also takes the opportunity to make the `no-crate-level-doc-lint`
test more specific.
- Use `register_renamed` when rustdoc is running so the lint will still
be active and use a structured suggestion
- Test the behavior for rustc, not just for rustdoc (because it differs)
- Rename `broken_intra_doc_links` to `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links`
- Ensure that the old lint names still work and give deprecation errors
- Register lints even when running doctests
Otherwise, all `rustdoc::` lints would be ignored.
- Register all existing lints as removed
This unfortunately doesn't work with `register_renamed` because tool
lints have not yet been registered when rustc is running. For similar
reasons, `check_backwards_compat` doesn't work either. Call
`register_removed` directly instead.
- Fix fallout
+ Rustdoc lints for compiler/
+ Rustdoc lints for library/
Note that this does *not* suggest `rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links` for
`rustdoc::intra_doc_link_resolution_failure`, since there was no time
when the latter was valid.
Highlight identifier span instead of whole pattern span in `unused` lint
Fixes#81314
This pretty much just changes the span highlighted in the lint from `pat_sp` to `ident.span`. There's however an exception, which is in patterns with shorthands like `Point { y, ref mut x }`, where a suggestion to change just `x` would be invalid; in those cases I had to keep the pattern span. Another option would be suggesting something like `Point { y, x: ref mut _x }`.
I also added a new test since there weren't any test that checked the `unused` lint with optional patterns.
The definition of this struct changes in LLVM 12 due to the addition
of branch coverage support. To avoid future mismatches, declare our
own struct and then convert between them.
Whether for Rust's own `target_os`, LLVM's triples, or GNU config's, the
OS-related have fields have been for code running *on* that OS, not code
that is *part* of the OS.
The difference is huge, as syscall interfaces are nothing like
freestanding interfaces. Kernels are (hypervisors and other more exotic
situations aside) freestanding programs that use the interfaces provided
by the hardware. It's *those* interfaces, the ones external to the
program being built and its software dependencies, that are the content
of the target.
For the Linux Kernel in particular, `target_env: "gnu"` is removed for
the same reason: that `-gnu` refers to glibc or GNU/linux, neither of
which applies to the kernel itself.
Relates to #74247
Thanks @ojeda for catching some things.
Apply lint restrictions from renamed lints
Previously, if you denied the old name of a renamed lint, it would warn
about using the new name, but otherwise do nothing. Now, it will behave
the same as if you'd used the new name.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82615.
r? `@ehuss`
make x86_64-pc-solaris the default target for x86-64 Solaris
This change makes `x86_64-pc-solaris` the default compilation target for x86-64 Solaris/Illumos (based on [this exchange](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/68214#issuecomment-748042054) with `@varkor).`
I tried several ways of doing this (leveraging the alias support added with #61761 and improved/fixed with #80073) and found out that cross-compilation to the new one is by far the simplest way of doing this. It can be achieved by adding the following arguments: `--build x86_64-sun-solaris --host x86_64-pc-solaris --target x86_64-pc-solaris` and enabling the cross compilation with `PKG_CONFIG_ALLOW_CROSS=1` environment variable.
I also removed alias support altogether - `x86_64-pc-solaris` and `x86_64-sun-solaris` are now two separate targets. The problem with aliases is that even if rust internally knows that two are the same, other tools building with rust don't know that, resulting in build issues like the one with firefox mentioned [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/68214#issuecomment-746144229). I think that once the dust settles and `x86_64-pc-solaris` becomes the default, `x86_64-sun-solaris` can be removed.
If you agree with the above, I have two subsequent questions:
1. Is there a preferred way to display deprecation warnings when `x86_64-sun-solaris` is passed into the compiler as an argument? I am not sure whether target deprecation was done before.
2. Where would be the best way to document this change for those using rust on Solaris? Without the cross-compilation arguments (used once to build a new version), the build won't work. Should I add it into [RELEASES.md](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/RELEASES.md)?
Thanks!
Remove storage markers if they won't be used during code generation
The storage markers constitute a substantial portion of all MIR
statements. At the same time, for builds without any optimizations,
the storage markers have no further use during and after MIR
optimization phase.
If storage markers are not necessary for code generation, remove them.
Fixed support for macOS Catalyst on ARM64
When I initially added Arm64 Catalyst support in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/77484 I had access to a DTK. However, while waiting to merge the PR some other changes were merged which caused conflicts in the branch. When fixing those conflicts I had no access to the DTK anymore and didn't try out if the resulting binaries did indeed work on Apple Silicon. I finally have a M1 and I realized that some small changes were necessary to support Apple Silicon. This PR adds the required changes. I've been running binaries generated with this branch for some time now and they work without issues.
