Key changes include:
- Removal of the word "syntax" from the lint message. More accurately,
it could have been something like "syntax group" or "syntax
category", but avoiding it completely is easier.
- The primary lint message now reflects exactly which mismatch is
occurring, instead of trying to be general. A new `help` line is
general across the mismatch kinds.
- Suggestions have been reduced to be more minimal, no longer also
changing non-idiomatic but unrelated aspects.
- Suggestion text no longer mentions changes when those changes don't
occur in that specific suggestion.
Check assoc consts and tys later like assoc fns
This PR
1. checks assoc consts and tys later like assoc fns
2. marks assoc consts appear in poly-trait-ref live
For assoc consts, considering
```rust
#![deny(dead_code)]
trait Tr { // ERROR trait `Tr` is never used
const I: Self;
}
struct Foo; //~ ERROR struct `Foo` is never constructed
impl Tr for Foo {
const I: Self = Foo;
}
fn main() {}
```
Current this will produce unused `I` instead of unused `Tr` and `Foo` ([play](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2024&gist=e0490d4a2d522cb70437b26e514a3d9c)), because `const I: Self = Foo;` will be added into the worklist at first:
```
error: associated constant `I` is never used
--> src/main.rs:4:11
|
3 | trait Tr { // ERROR trait `Tr` is never used
| -- associated constant in this trait
4 | const I: Self;
| ^
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> src/main.rs:1:9
|
1 | #![deny(dead_code)]
| ^^^^^^^^^
error: could not compile `playground` (bin "playground") due to 1 previous error
```
This also happens to assoc tys, see the [new test](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/compare/master...mu001999-contrib:rust:dead-code/impl-items?expand=1#diff-bf45fa403934a31c9d610a073ed2603d885e7e81572e8edf38b7f4e08a1f3531)
Fixesrust-lang/rust#126729
r? `````@petrochenkov`````
New tracking issues for const_ops and const_cmp
Let's do a clean start with new tracking issues to avoid mixing things up with the previous constification.
I assume the fact that the `PartialEq` *trait* and *impls* used different feature names was a mistake (the feature name on the impl is entirely irrelevant anyway).
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/143800, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/143802
r? ``@oli-obk``
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#143403 (Port several trait/coherence-related attributes the new attribute system)
- rust-lang/rust#143633 (fix: correct assertion to check for 'noinline' attribute presence before removal)
- rust-lang/rust#143647 (Clarify and expand documentation for std::sys_common dependency structure)
- rust-lang/rust#143716 (compiler: doc/comment some codegen-for-functions interfaces)
- rust-lang/rust#143747 (Add target maintainer information for aarch64-unknown-linux-musl)
- rust-lang/rust#143759 (Fix typos in function names in the `target_feature` test)
- rust-lang/rust#143767 (Bump `src/tools/x` to Edition 2024 and some cleanups)
- rust-lang/rust#143769 (Remove support for SwitchInt edge effects in backward dataflow)
- rust-lang/rust#143770 (build-helper: clippy fixes)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Port several trait/coherence-related attributes the new attribute system
Part of rust-lang/rust#131229
This ports:
- `#[const_trait]`
- `#[rustc_deny_explicit_impl]`
- `#[rustc_do_not_implement_via_object]`
- `#[rustc_coinductive]`
- `#[type_const]`
- `#[rustc_specialization_trait]`
- `#[rustc_unsafe_specialization_marker]`
- `#[marker]`
- `#[fundamental]`
- `#[rustc_paren_sugar]`
- `#[rustc_allow_incoherent_impl]`
- `#[rustc_coherence_is_core]`
This also changes `#[marker]` to error on duplicates instead of warning.
cc rust-lang/rust#142838, but I don't think it matters too much, since it's unstable.
r? ``@oli-obk``
When a trait bound fails due to the Self type parameter, adjust_fulfillment_errors
now correctly points to the corresponding function argument instead of incorrectly
pointing to other arguments.
Signed-off-by: xizheyin <xizheyin@smail.nju.edu.cn>
gce: don't ICE on non-local const
Fixesrust-lang/rust#133808
I have absolutely no idea what I'm doing here, but I followed `@BoxyUwU` 's [instructions](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133808#issuecomment-3009122957), and turns out this small change fixesrust-lang/rust#133808, and doesn't seem to break anything else.
(This code path is only reachable when the GCE feature gate is enabled, so even if it does break in a way that is not caught by current test coverage, I guess it's not as bad as breaking stable or non-incomplete features?)
Anyways, r? `@BoxyUwU` , if you don't mind.
New const traits syntax
This PR only affects the AST and doesn't actually change anything semantically.
All occurrences of `~const` outside of libcore have been replaced by `[const]`. Within libcore we have to wait for rustfmt to be bumped in the bootstrap compiler. This will happen "automatically" (when rustfmt is run) during the bootstrap bump, as rustfmt converts `~const` into `[const]`. After this we can remove the `~const` support from the parser
Caveat discovered during impl: there is no legacy bare trait object recovery for `[const] Trait` as that snippet in type position goes down the slice /array parsing code and will error
r? ``@fee1-dead``
cc ``@nikomatsakis`` ``@traviscross`` ``@compiler-errors``
This centralizes the placeholder type error reporting in one location, but it also exposes the granularity at which we convert things from hir to ty more. E.g. previously infer types in where bounds were errored together with the function signature, but now they are independent.
Marks ADT live if it appears in pattern
Marks ADT live if it appears in pattern, it implies the construction of the ADT.
1. Then we can detect unused private ADTs impl `Default`, without special logics for `Default` and other std traits.
2. We can also remove `rustc_trivial_field_reads` on `Default`, and the logic in `should_ignore_item` (introduced by rust-lang/rust#126302).
Fixesrust-lang/rust#120770
Extracted from rust-lang/rust#128637.
r? `@petrochenkov`
These tests just need blessing, they don't have any interesting behaviour
changes.
Some of these tests have new errors because `LegacyReceiver` cannot be
proven to be implemented now that it is also testing for `MetaSized` -
but this is just a consequence of the other errors in the test.
rustc_resolve: Improve `resolve_const_param_in_non_trivial_anon_const` wording
In some contexts, const expressions are OK. Add a `here` to the error message to clarify this.
Closesrust-lang/rust#79429 which has 15 x 👍
Verbose suggestion to make param `const`
```
error[E0747]: type provided when a constant was expected
--> $DIR/invalid-const-arguments.rs:10:19
|
LL | impl<N> Foo for B<N> {}
| ^
|
help: consider changing this type parameter to a const parameter
|
LL - impl<N> Foo for B<N> {}
LL + impl<const N: u8> Foo for B<N> {}
|
```
Part of rust-lang/rust#141973.
Add a new `mismatched-lifetime-syntaxes` lint
The lang-team [discussed this](https://hackmd.io/nf4ZUYd7Rp6rq-1svJZSaQ) and I attempted to [summarize](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120808#issuecomment-2701863833) their decision. The summary-of-the-summary is:
- Using two different kinds of syntax for elided lifetimes is confusing. In rare cases, it may even [lead to unsound code](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48686)! Some examples:
```rust
// Lint will warn about these
fn(v: ContainsLifetime) -> ContainsLifetime<'_>;
fn(&'static u8) -> &u8;
```
- Matching up references with no lifetime syntax, references with anonymous lifetime syntax, and paths with anonymous lifetime syntax is an exception to the simplest possible rule:
```rust
// Lint will not warn about these
fn(&u8) -> &'_ u8;
fn(&'_ u8) -> &u8;
fn(&u8) -> ContainsLifetime<'_>;
```
- Having a lint for consistent syntax of elided lifetimes will make the [future goal](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91639) of warning-by-default for paths participating in elision much simpler.
---
This new lint attempts to accomplish the goal of enforcing consistent syntax. In the process, it supersedes and replaces the existing `elided-named-lifetimes` lint, which means it starts out life as warn-by-default.
```
error[E0747]: type provided when a constant was expected
--> $DIR/invalid-const-arguments.rs:10:19
|
LL | impl<N> Foo for B<N> {}
| ^
|
help: consider changing this type parameter to a const parameter
|
LL - impl<N> Foo for B<N> {}
LL + impl<const N: u8> Foo for B<N> {}
|
```
Defer evaluating type system constants when they use infers or params
Split out of #137972, the parts necessary for associated const equality and min generic const args to make progress and have correct semantics around when CTFE is invoked. According to a [previous perf run](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=93257e2d20809d82d1bc0fcc1942480d1a66d7cd&end=01b4cbf0f47c3f782330db88fa5ba199bba1f8a2&stat=instructions:u) of adding the new `const_arg_kind` query we should expect minor regressions here.
I think this is acceptable as we should be able to remove this query relatively soon once mgca is more complete as we'll then be able to implement GCE in terms of mgca and rip out `GCEConst` at which point it's trivial to determine what kind of anon const we're dealing with (either it has generics and is a repeat expr hack, or it doesnt and is a normal anon const).
This should only affect unstable code as we handle repeat exprs specially and those are the only kinds of type system consts that are allowed to make use of generic parameters.
Fixes#133066Fixes#133199Fixes#136894Fixes#137813
r? compiler-errors
Don't FCW assoc consts in patterns
Fixes#140447
See comment in added test. We could also check that the anon const is a const arg by looking at the HIR. I'm not sure that's necessary though 🤔 The only consts that are evaluated "for the type system" are const args (which *should* get FCWs) and const patterns (which cant be anon consts afaik).
