UnsafePinned: also include the effects of UnsafeCell
This tackles https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/137750 by including an `UnsafeCell` in `UnsafePinned`, thus imbuing it with all the usual properties of interior mutability (no `noalias` nor `dereferenceable` on shared refs, special treatment by Miri's aliasing model). The soundness issue is not fixed yet because coroutine lowering does not use `UnsafePinned`.
The RFC said that `UnsafePinned` would not permit mutability on shared references, but since then, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/137750 has demonstrated that this is not tenable. In the face of those examples, I propose that we do the "obvious" thing and permit shared mutable state inside `UnsafePinned`. This seems loosely consistent with the fact that we allow going from `Pin<&mut T>` to `&T` (where the former can be aliased with other pointers that perform mutation, and hence the same goes for the latter) -- but the `as_ref` example shows that we in fact would need to add this `UnsafeCell` even if we didn't have a safe conversion to `&T`, since for the compiler and Miri, `&T` and `Pin<&T>` are basically the same type.
To make this possible, I had to remove the `Copy` and `Clone` impls for `UnsafePinned`.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/125735
Cc ``@rust-lang/lang`` ``@rust-lang/opsem`` ``@Sky9x``
I don't think this needs FCP since the type is still unstable -- we'll finally decide whether we like this approach when `UnsafePinned` is moved towards stabilization (IOW, this PR is reversible). However, I'd still like to make sure that the lang team is okay with the direction I am proposing here.
Improve the documentation of `Display` and `FromStr`, and their interactions
In particular:
- `Display` is not necessarily lossless
- The output of `Display` might not be parseable by `FromStr`, and might
not produce the same value if it is.
- Calling `.parse()` on the output of `Display` is usually a mistake
unless a type's documented output and input formats match.
- The input formats accepted by `FromStr` depend on the type.
This documentation adds no API surface area and makes no guarantees about stability. To the best of my knowledge, everything it says is already established to be true. As such, I don't think it needs an FCP.
- Drop the phrasing "usually a mistake".
- Mention that `Display` may not be lossless.
- Drop a misplaced parenthetical about round-tripping that didn't fit
the paragraph it was in.
In particular:
- `Display` is not necessarily lossless
- The output of `Display` might not be parseable by `FromStr`, and might
not produce the same value if it is.
- Calling `.parse()` on the output of `Display` is usually a mistake
unless a type's documented output and input formats match.
- The input formats accepted by `FromStr` depend on the type.
Remove bootstrap cfgs from library/
These `cfg(bootstrap)` are always false now that rust-lang/rust#119899 has landed, and likewise `cfg(not(bootstrap))` is always true. Therefore, we don't need to wait for the usual stage0 bump to clean these up.
This adds an `iter!` macro that can be used to create movable
generators.
This also adds a yield_expr feature so the `yield` keyword can be used
within iter! macro bodies. This was needed because several unstable
features each need `yield` expressions, so this allows us to stabilize
them separately from any individual feature.
Co-authored-by: Oli Scherer <github35764891676564198441@oli-obk.de>
Co-authored-by: Jieyou Xu <jieyouxu@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Travis Cross <tc@traviscross.com>
Streamlined the explanation of covariance for `NonNull<T>`,
focusing on practical usage and reducing scary explanation.
Added a concise example for cases where invariance is required,
showing how to use `PhantomData<Cell<T>>
Signed-off-by: xizheyin <xizheyin@smail.nju.edu.cn>
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#141554 (Improve documentation for codegen options)
- rust-lang/rust#141817 (rustc_llvm: add Windows system libs only when cross-compiling from Wi…)
- rust-lang/rust#141843 (Add `visit_id` to ast `Visitor`)
- rust-lang/rust#141881 (Subtree update of `rust-analyzer`)
- rust-lang/rust#141898 ([rustdoc-json] Implement PartialOrd and Ord for rustdoc_types::Id)
- rust-lang/rust#141921 (Disable f64 minimum/maximum tests for arm 32)
- rust-lang/rust#141930 (Enable triagebot `[concern]` functionality)
- rust-lang/rust#141936 (Decouple "reporting in deps" from `FutureIncompatibilityReason`)
- rust-lang/rust#141949 (move `test-float-parse` tool into `src/tools` dir)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Disable f64 minimum/maximum tests for arm 32
This disables the f64 minimum/maximum tests for the arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf job. The next release will be supporting cross-compiled doctests, and these tests fail on that platform.
It looks like this was just fixed via https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142170, but I assume that will not trickle down to our copy of llvm in the next couple of weeks. Assuming that does get fixed when llvm is updated, then these can be removed.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/141087
Add that the enum must be `#[repr(Rust)]` and not `#[repr(packed)]` or `#[repr(align)]` in order to be ABI-compatible with its null-pointer-optimized field.
This disables the f64 minimum/maximum tests for the
arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf job. The next release will be supporting
cross-compiled doctests, and these tests fail on that platform.
It looks like this was just fixed via
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142170, but I assume that will
not trickle down to our copy of llvm in the next couple of weeks.
Assuming that does get fixed when llvm is updated, then these can be
removed.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/141087
terminology: allocated object → allocation
Rust does not have "objects" in memory so "allocated object" is a somewhat odd name. I am not sure where the term comes from. "object" has been used to refer to allocations already [in 1.0 docs](https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.0.0/std/primitive.pointer.html#method.offset); this was apparently later changed to "allocated object".
"Allocation" is already the terminology used in Miri and in the [UCG](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#allocation). We should properly move to that terminology, and avoid any confusion about whether Rust has an object memory model. (It does not. Memory contains untyped bytes.)
Cc ``@rust-lang/opsem`` ``@rust-lang/lang``
Add `const` support for float rounding methods
# Add `const` support for float rounding methods
This PR makes the following float rounding methods `const`:
- `f64::{floor, ceil, trunc, round, round_ties_even}`
- and the corresponding methods for `f16`, `f32` and `f128`
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/141555
## Procedure
I followed c09ed3e767 as closely as I could in making float methods `const`, and also received great guidance from https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/const-rounding-methods-in-float-types/22957/3?u=ruancomelli.
## Note
This is my first code contribution to the Rust project, so please let me know if I missed anything - I'd be more than happy to revise and learn more. Thank you for taking the time to review it!
std: clarify Clone trait documentation about duplication semantics
Closesrust-lang/rust#141138
The change explicitly explains that cloning behavior varies by type and clarifies that smart pointers (`Arc`, `Rc`) share the same underlying data. I've also added an example of cloning to Arc.
`slice.get(i)` should use a slice projection in MIR, like `slice[i]` does
`slice[i]` is built-in magic, so ends up being quite different from `slice.get(i)` in MIR, even though they're both doing nearly identical operations -- checking the length of the slice then getting a ref/ptr to the element if it's in-bounds.
This PR adds a `slice_get_unchecked` intrinsic for `impl SliceIndex for usize` to use to fix that, so it no longer needs to do a bunch of lines of pointer math and instead just gets the obvious single statement. (This is *not* used for the range versions, since `slice[i..]` and `slice[..k]` can't use the mir Slice projection as they're using fenceposts, not indices.)
I originally tried to do this with some kind of GVN pattern, but realized that I'm pretty sure it's not legal to optimize `BinOp::Offset` to `PlaceElem::Index` without an extremely complicated condition. Basically, the problem is that the `Index` projection on a dereferenced slice pointer *cares about the metadata*, since it's UB to `PlaceElem::Index` outside the range described by the metadata. But then you cast the fat pointer to a thin pointer then offset it, that *ignores* the slice length metadata, so it's possible to write things that are legal with `Offset` but would be UB if translated in the obvious way to `Index`. Checking (or even determining) the necessary conditions for that would be complicated and error-prone, whereas this intrinsic-based approach is quite straight-forward.
Zero backend changes, because it just lowers to MIR, so it's already supported naturally by CTFE/Miri/cg_llvm/cg_clif.
Add const support for the float rounding methods floor, ceil, trunc,
fract, round and round_ties_even.
This works by moving the calculation logic from
src/tools/miri/src/intrinsics/mod.rs
into
compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/intrinsics.rs.
All relevant method definitions were adjusted to include the `const`
keyword for all supported float types: f16, f32, f64 and f128.
The constness is hidden behind the feature gate
feature(const_float_round_methods)
which is tracked in
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/141555
This commit is a squash of the following commits:
- test: add tests that we expect to pass when float rounding becomes const
- feat: make float rounding methods `const`
- fix: replace `rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable(core_intrinsics)` attribute with `#[rustc_const_unstable(feature = "f128", issue = "116909")]` in `library/core/src/num/f128.rs`
- revert: undo update to `library/stdarch`
- refactor: replace multiple `float_<mode>_intrinsic` rounding methods with a single, parametrized one
- fix: add `#[cfg(not(bootstrap))]` to new const method tests
- test: add extra sign tests to check `+0.0` and `-0.0`
- revert: undo accidental changes to `round` docs
- fix: gate `const` float round method behind `const_float_round_methods`
- fix: remove unnecessary `#![feature(const_float_methods)]`
- fix: remove unnecessary `#![feature(const_float_methods)]` [2]
- revert: undo changes to `tests/ui/consts/const-eval/float_methods.rs`
- fix: adjust after rebase
- test: fix float tests
- test: add tests for `fract`
- chore: add commented-out `const_float_round_methods` feature gates to `f16` and `f128`
- fix: adjust NaN when rounding floats
- chore: add FIXME comment for de-duplicating float tests
- test: remove unnecessary test file `tests/ui/consts/const-eval/float_methods.rs`
- test: fix tests after upstream simplification of how float tests are run
This commit improves the Clone trait documentation to address confusion
around what "duplication" means for different types, especially for smart
pointers like Arc<Mutex<T>>.
Signed-off-by: xizheyin <xizheyin@smail.nju.edu.cn>
core: begin deduplicating pointer docs
this also cleans up two inconsistancies:
1. both doctests on the ::add methods were actually calling the const version.
2. on of the ::offset methods was missing a line of clarification.
part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/139190
Implement ((un)checked_)exact_div methods for integers
tracking issue: #139911
I see that there might still be some bikeshedding to be done, so if people want changes to this implementation, I'm happy to make those. I did also see that there was a previous attempt at this PR (#116632), but I'm not sure why it got closed.
atomic_load intrinsic: use const generic parameter for ordering
We have a gazillion intrinsics for the atomics because we encode the ordering into the intrinsic name rather than making it a parameter. This is particularly bad for those operations that take two orderings. Let's fix that!
This PR only converts `load`, to see if there's any feedback that would fundamentally change the strategy we pursue for the const generic intrinsics.
The first two commits are preparation and could be a separate PR if you prefer.
`@BoxyUwU` -- I hope this is a use of const generics that is unlikely to explode? All we need is a const generic of enum type. We could funnel it through an integer if we had to but an enum is obviously nicer...
`@bjorn3` it seems like the cranelift backend entirely ignores the ordering?
Add `loongarch64` with `d` feature to `f32::midpoint` fast path
This patch enables the optimized implementation of `f32::midpoint` for `loongarch64` targets that support the `d`feature. Targets with reliable 64-bit float support can safely use the faster and more accurate computation via `f64`, avoiding the fallback branchy version.
