Tweak some attributes to improve panic_immediate_abort
This is similar to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117332; I did the same approach as before where I build a really big project with `-Zbuild-std -Zbuild-std-features=panic_immediate_abort` and grep its symbols for things that look panic-related.
Fix typos in floating-point primitive type docs
Fixes a few typos. Also reflows the text of a couple of paragraphs in the source code to the standard line width to make the source easier to read (will have no effect on the rendered documentation).
As our implementation of MCP411 nears completion and we begin to
solicit testing, it's no longer reasonable to expect testers to
type or remember `BikeshedIntrinsicFrom`. The name degrades the
ease-of-reading of documentation, and the overall experience of
using compiler safe transmute.
Tentatively, we'll instead adopt `TransmuteFrom`.
This name seems to be the one most likely to be stabilized, after
discussion on Zulip [1]. We may want to revisit the ordering of
`Src` and `Dst` before stabilization, at which point we'd likely
consider `TransmuteInto` or `Transmute`.
[1] https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/216762-project-safe-transmute/topic/What.20should.20.60BikeshedIntrinsicFrom.60.20be.20named.3F
simd_shuffle intrinsic: allow argument to be passed as vector
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/128738 for context.
I'd like to get rid of [this hack](6c0b89dfac/compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/block.rs (L922-L935)). https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/128537 almost lets us do that since constant SIMD vectors will then be passed as immediate arguments. However, simd_shuffle for some reason actually takes an *array* as argument, not a vector, so the hack is still required to ensure that the array becomes an immediate (which then later stages of codegen convert into a vector, as that's what LLVM needs).
This PR prepares simd_shuffle to also support a vector as the `idx` argument. Once this lands, stdarch can hopefully be updated to pass `idx` as a vector, and then support for arrays can be removed, which finally lets us get rid of that hack.
Document & implement the transmutation modeled by `BikeshedIntrinsicFrom`
Documents that `BikeshedIntrinsicFrom` models transmute-via-union, which is slightly more expressive than the transmute-via-cast implemented by `transmute_copy`. Additionally, we provide an implementation of transmute-via-union as a method on the `BikeshedIntrinsicFrom` trait with additional documentation on the boundary between trait invariants and caller obligations.
Whether or not transmute-via-union is the right kind of transmute to model remains up for discussion [1]. Regardless, it seems wise to document the present behavior.
[1] https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/216762-project-safe-transmute/topic/What.20'kind'.20of.20transmute.20to.20model.3F/near/426331967
Tracking Issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99571
r? `@compiler-errors`
cc `@scottmcm,` `@Lokathor`
Remove cfg(test) from library/core
The diff here is very small with the ignore whitespace option.
`core` doesn't/can't have unit tests. All of its tests are just modules under `tests/`, so it has no use for `cfg(test)`, because the entire contents of `library/core/src` are only ever compiled with that cfg off, and the entire contents of `library/core/tests` are only ever compiled with that cfg on.
You can tell this is what's happening because we had `#[cfg(test)]` on a module declaration that has no source file.
I also deleted the extra `mod tests {` layer of nesting; there's no need to mention again in the module path that this is a module of tests. This exposes a name collision between the `u128` module of tests and `core::u128`. Fixed that by using `<u128>::MAX` like is done in the `check!` macro, which is what avoids this name ambiguity for the other types.
link to Future::poll from the Poll docs
The most important thing about Poll is that Future::poll returns it, but previously the docs didn't emphasize this.
Add implementations for `unbounded_shl`/`unbounded_shr`
Tracking Issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/129375
This implements `unbounded_shl` and `unbounded_shr` under the feature gate `unbounded_shifts`
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #129288 (Use subtyping for `UnsafeFnPointer` coercion, too)
- #129405 (Fixing span manipulation and indentation of the suggestion introduced by #126187)
- #129518 (gitignore: ignore ICE reports regardless of directory)
- #129519 (Remove redundant flags from `lower_ty_common` that can be inferred from the HIR)
- #129525 (rustdoc: clean up tuple <-> primitive conversion docs)
- #129526 (Use `FxHasher` on new solver unconditionally)
- #129544 (Removes dead code from the compiler)
- #129553 (add back test for stable-const-can-only-call-stable-const)
- #129590 (Avoid taking reference of &TyKind)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rustdoc: clean up tuple <-> primitive conversion docs
This adds a minor missing feature to `fake_variadic`, so that it can render `impl From<(T,)> for [T; 1]` correctly.
- Stable sort uses a simple merge-sort that re-uses the existing - rather gnarly - merge function.
- Unstable sort jumps directly to the branchless heapsort fallback.
- select_nth_unstable jumps directly to the median_of_medians fallback, which is augmented with a
custom tiny smallsort and partition impl.
Some code is duplicated but de-duplication would bring it's own problems. For example `swap_if_less`
is critical for performance, if the sorting networks don't inline it perf drops drastically,
however `#[inline(always)]` is also a poor fit, if the provided comparison function is huge,
it gives the compiler an out to only instantiate `swap_if_less` once and call it. Another aspect
that would suffer when making `swap_if_less` pub, is having to cfg out dozens of functions in
in smallsort module.
Put Pin::as_deref_mut in impl Pin<Ptr> / rearrange Pin methods
Tracking issue: #86918
Based on the suggestion in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/86918#issuecomment-2189367582
> Some advantages:
>
> * Synergy with the existing `as_ref` and `as_mut` signatures (stable since Rust 1.33)
>
> * Lifetime elision reduces noise in the signature
>
> * Turbofish less verbose: `Pin::<&mut T>::as_deref_mut` vs `Pin::<&mut Pin<&mut T>>::as_deref_mut`
The comment seemed to imply that `Pin::as_ref` and `Pin::as_mut` already share an impl block, which they don't. So, I rearranged it so that they do, and we can see which looks better in the docs.
<details><summary><b>Docs screenshots</b></summary>
Current nightly:
`Pin::as_deref_mut` moved into the same block as `as_mut`:
`Pin::as_ref`, `as_mut`, and `as_deref_mut` all in the same block:
</details>
I think I like the last one the most; obviously I'm biased since I'm the one who rearranged it, but it doesn't make sense to me to have `as_ref` methods split up by an `into_inner` method.
r? dtolnay
Add a special case for `CStr`/`CString` in the `improper_ctypes` lint
Revives #120176. Just needed to bless a test and fix an argument, but seemed reasonable to me otherwise.
Instead of saying to "consider adding a `#[repr(C)]` or `#[repr(transparent)]` attribute to this struct", we now tell users to "Use `*const ffi::c_char` instead, and pass the value from `CStr::as_ptr()`" when the type involved is a `CStr` or a `CString`.
The suggestion is not made for `&mut CString` or `*mut CString`.
r? ``````@cjgillot`````` (since you were the reviewer of the original PR #120176, but feel free to reroll)
remove invalid `TyCompat` relation for effects
if the current impl uses `Maybe` (`impl const`), the parent impl must use `Maybe` (`impl const`) as well.
I'd like to rename `TyCompat` to `Sub` which is probably clearer. But it would conflict with my other PR.
r? ``@rust-lang/project-const-traits``
Documents that `BikeshedIntrinsicFrom` models transmute-via-union,
which is slightly more expressive than the transmute-via-cast
implemented by `transmute_copy`. Additionally, we provide an
implementation of transmute-via-union as a method on the
`BikeshedIntrinsicFrom` trait with additional documentation on
the boundary between trait invariants and caller obligations.
Whether or not transmute-via-union is the right kind of transmute
to model remains up for discussion [1]. Regardless, it seems wise
to document the present behavior.
[1] https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/216762-project-safe-transmute/topic/What.20'kind'.20of.20transmute.20to.20model.3F/near/426331967
