Remove mention of `exhaustive_patterns` from `never` docs
The example shows an exhaustive match:
```rust
#![feature(exhaustive_patterns)]
use std::str::FromStr;
let Ok(s) = String::from_str("hello");
```
But https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/119612 moved this functionality to `#![feature(min_exhaustive_patterns)` and then stabilized it.
Switch some rustc_on_unimplemented uses to diagnostic::on_unimplemented
The use on the SliceIndex impl appears unreachable, there is no mention of "vector indices" in any test output and I could not get it to show up in error messages.
Simplify expansion for format_args!().
Instead of calling `Placeholder::new()`, we can just use a struct expression directly.
Before:
```rust
Placeholder::new(…, …, …, …)
```
After:
```rust
Placeholder {
position: …,
flags: …,
width: …,
precision: …,
}
```
(I originally avoided the struct expression, because `Placeholder` had a lot of fields. But now that https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136974 is merged, it only has four fields left.)
This will make the `fmt` argument to `fmt::Arguments::new_v1_formatted()` a candidate for const promotion, which is important if we ever hope to tackle https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/92698 (It doesn't change anything yet though, because the `args` argument to `fmt::Arguments::new_v1_formatted()` is not const-promotable.)
Remove unsafe `split_at_unchecked` and `split_at_mut_unchecked`
in some slice `split_first_chunk`/`split_last_chunk` methods.
Replace those calls with the safe `split_at` and `split_at_checked` where
applicable.
Add codegen tests to check for no panics when calculating the last
chunk index using `checked_sub` and `split_at`
Instead of calling new(), we can just use a struct expression directly.
Before:
Placeholder::new(…, …, …, …)
After:
Placeholder {
position: …,
flags: …,
width: …,
precision: …,
}
stabilize const_cell
``@rust-lang/libs-api`` ``@rust-lang/wg-const-eval`` I see no reason to wait any longer, so I propose we stabilize the use of `Cell` in `const fn` -- specifically the APIs listed here:
```rust
// core::cell
impl<T> Cell<T> {
pub const fn replace(&self, val: T) -> T;
}
impl<T: Copy> Cell<T> {
pub const fn get(&self) -> T;
}
impl<T: ?Sized> Cell<T> {
pub const fn get_mut(&mut self) -> &mut T;
pub const fn from_mut(t: &mut T) -> &Cell<T>;
}
impl<T> Cell<[T]> {
pub const fn as_slice_of_cells(&self) -> &[Cell<T>];
}
```
Unfortunately, `set` cannot be made `const fn` yet as it drops the old contents.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131283
Override PartialOrd methods for bool
I noticed that `PartialOrd` implementation for `bool` does not override the individual operator methods, unlike the other primitive types like `char` and integers.
This commit extracts these `PartialOrd` overrides shared by the other primitive types into a macro and calls it on `bool` too.
CC `@scottmcm` for our recent adventures in `PartialOrd` land
I noticed that `PartialOrd` implementation for `bool` does not override the
individual operator methods, unlike the other primitive types like `char`
and integers.
This commit extracts these `PartialOrd` overrides shared by the other
primitive types into a macro and calls it on `bool` too.
Simplify `PartialOrd` on tuples containing primitives
We noticed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133984#issuecomment-2704011800 that currently the tuple comparison code, while it [does optimize down](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/tests/codegen/comparison-operators-2-tuple.rs) today, is kinda huge: <https://rust.godbolt.org/z/xqMoeYbhE>
This PR changes the tuple code to go through an overridable "chaining" version of the comparison functions, so that for simple things like `(i16, u16)` and `(f32, f32)` (as seen in the new MIR pre-codegen test) we just directly get the
```rust
if lhs.0 == rhs.0 { lhs.0 OP rhs.0 }
else { lhs.1 OP rhs.1 }
```
version in MIR, rather than emitting a mess for LLVM to have to clean up.
Test added in the first commit, so you can see the MIR diff in the second one.
core: optimize `RepeatN`
...by adding an optimized implementation of `try_fold` and `fold` as well as replacing some unnecessary `mem::replace` calls with `MaybeUninit` helper methods.
...by adding an optimized implementation of `try_fold` and `fold` as well as replacing some unnecessary `mem::replace` calls with `MaybeUninit` helper methods.
Reduce FormattingOptions to 64 bits
This is part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99012
This reduces FormattingOptions from 6-7 machine words (384 bits on 64-bit platforms, 224 bits on 32-bit platforms) to just 64 bits (a single register on 64-bit platforms).
Before:
```rust
pub struct FormattingOptions {
flags: u32, // only 6 bits used
fill: char,
align: Option<Alignment>,
width: Option<usize>,
precision: Option<usize>,
}
```
After:
```rust
pub struct FormattingOptions {
/// Bits:
/// - 0-20: fill character (21 bits, a full `char`)
/// - 21: `+` flag
/// - 22: `-` flag
/// - 23: `#` flag
/// - 24: `0` flag
/// - 25: `x?` flag
/// - 26: `X?` flag
/// - 27: Width flag (if set, the width field below is used)
/// - 28: Precision flag (if set, the precision field below is used)
/// - 29-30: Alignment (0: Left, 1: Right, 2: Center, 3: Unknown)
/// - 31: Always set to 1
flags: u32,
/// Width if width flag above is set. Otherwise, always 0.
width: u16,
/// Precision if precision flag above is set. Otherwise, always 0.
precision: u16,
}
```
Add an attribute that makes the spans from a macro edition 2021, and fix pin on edition 2024 with it
Fixes a regression, see issue below. This is a temporary fix, super let is the real solution.
Closes#138596
This commit adds the 5f00::/16 range defined by RFC9602 to those ranges which Ipv6Addr::is_global recognises as a non-global IP. This range is used for Segment Routing (SRv6) SIDs.
Optimize `io::Write::write_fmt` for constant strings
When the formatting args to `fmt::Write::write_fmt` are a statically known string, it simplifies to only calling `write_str` without a runtime branch. Do the same in `io::Write::write_fmt` with `write_all`.
Also, match the convention of `fmt::Write` for the name of `args`.
`MaybeUninit` inherent slice methods part 2
These were moved out of #129259 since they require additional libs-api approval. Tracking issue: #117428.
New API surface:
```rust
impl<T> [MaybeUninit<T>] {
// replacing fill; renamed to avoid conflict
pub fn write_filled(&mut self, value: T) -> &mut [T] where T: Clone;
// replacing fill_with; renamed to avoid conflict
pub fn write_with<F>(&mut self, value: F) -> &mut [T] where F: FnMut() -> T;
// renamed to remove "fill" terminology, since this is closer to the write_*_of_slice methods
pub fn write_iter<I>(&mut self, iter: I) -> (&mut [T], &mut Self) where I: Iterator<Item = T>;
}
```
Relevant motivation for these methods; see #129259 for earlier methods' motiviations.
* I chose `write_filled` since `filled` is being used as an object here, whereas it's being used as an action in `fill`.
* I chose `write_with` instead of `write_filled_with` since it's shorter and still matches well.
* I chose `write_iter` because it feels completely different from the fill methods, and still has the intent clear.
In all of the methods, it felt appropriate to ensure that they contained `write` to clarify that they are effectively just special ways of doing `MaybeUninit::write` for each element of a slice.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/117428
r? libs-api
When the formatting args to `fmt::Write::write_fmt` are a statically
known string, it simplifies to only calling `write_str` without a
runtime branch. Do the same in `io::Write::write_fmt` with `write_all`.
Also, match the convention of `fmt::Write` for the name of `args`.
Denote `ControlFlow` as `#[must_use]`
I've repeatedly hit bugs in the compiler due to `ControlFlow` not being marked `#[must_use]`. There seems to be an accepted ACP to make the type `#[must_use]` (https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/444), so this PR implements that part of it.
Most of the usages in the compiler that trigger this new warning are "root" usages (calling into an API that uses control-flow internally, but for which the callee doesn't really care) and have been suppressed by `let _ = ...`, but I did legitimately find one instance of a missing `?` and one for a never-used `ControlFlow` value in #137448.
Presumably this needs an FCP too, so I'm opening this and nominating it for T-libs-api.
This PR also touches the tools (incl. rust-analyzer), but if this went into FCP, I'd split those out into separate PRs which can land before this one does.
r? libs-api
`@rustbot` label: T-libs-api I-libs-api-nominated
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #136293 (document capacity for ZST as example)
- #136359 (doc all differences of ptr:copy(_nonoverlapping) with memcpy and memmove)
- #136816 (refactor `notable_traits_button` to use iterator combinators instead of for loop)
- #138552 (Misc print request handling cleanups + a centralized test for print request stability gating)
- #138573 (Make `_Unwind_Action` a type alias, not enum)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Add `From<{integer}>` for `f16`/`f128` impls
This PR adds `impl From<{bool,i8,u8}> for f16` and `impl From<{bool,i8,u8,i16,u16,i32,u32}> for f128`.
The `From<{i64,u64}> for f128` impls are left commented out as adding them would allow using `f128` on stable before it is stabilised like in the following example:
```rust
fn f<T: From<u64>>(x: T) -> T { x }
fn main() {
let x = f(1.0); // the type of the literal is inferred to be `f128`
}
```
None of the impls added in this PR have this issue as they are all, at minimum, also implemented by `f64`.
This PR will need a crater run for the `From<{i32,u32}>` impls, as `f64` is no longer the only float type to implement them (similar to the cause of #125198).
cc `@bjoernager`
r? `@tgross35`
Tracking issue: #116909
Optimize multi-char string patterns
Uses specialization for `[T]::contains` from #130991 to optimize multi-char patterns in string searches.
Requesting a perf run to see if this actually has an effect 🙏
(I think that adding `char` to the list of types for which the `SliceContains` is specialized is a good idea, even if it doesn't show up on perf - might be helpful for downstream users)
core: Make `Debug` impl of raw pointers print metadata if present
Make Rust pointers appear less magic by including metadata information in their `Debug` output.
This does not break Rust stability guarantees because `Debug` impl are explicitly exempted from stability:
https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/fmt/trait.Debug.html#stability
> ## Stability
>
> Derived `Debug` formats are not stable, and so may change with future Rust versions. Additionally, `Debug` implementations of types provided by the standard library (`std`, `core`, `alloc`, etc.) are not stable, and may also change with future Rust versions.
Note that a regression test is added as a separate commit to make it clear what impact the last commit has on the output.
Closes#128684 because the output of that code now becomes:
```
thread 'main' panicked at src/main.rs:5:5:
assertion `left == right` failed
left: Pointer { addr: 0x7ffd45c6fc6b, metadata: 5 }
right: Pointer { addr: 0x7ffd45c6fc6b, metadata: 3 }
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
```
