Update the stdsimd submodule
This brings in a few updates:
* Update wasm intrinsic naming for atomics
* Update and reimplement most simd128 wasm intrinsics
* Other misc improvements here and there, including a small start to
AVX-512 intrinsics
Adding unwinding support for x86_64_fortanix_unknown_sgx target.
Unwinding support is provided by our port of LLVM's libunwind which is available from https://github.com/fortanix/libunwind/tree/release_50.
libunwind requires support for rwlock and printing to stderr, which is only provided by `std` for this target. This poses two problems: 1) how to expose the `std` functionality to C and 2) dependency inversion.
### Exposing `std`
For exposing the functionality we chose to expose the following symbols:
* __rust_rwlock_rdlock
* __rust_rwlock_wrlock
* __rust_rwlock_unlock
* __rust_print_err
* __rust_abort
Also, the following are needed from `alloc`:
* __rust_alloc
* __rust_dealloc
#### Rust RWLock in C
In `libunwind`, RWLock is initialized as a templated static variable:
```c
pthread_rwlock_t DwarfFDECache<A>::_lock = PTHREAD_RWLOCK_INITIALIZER;
```
I don't know of a good way to use the Rust sys::rwlock::RWLock type and initializer there. We could have a static global variable in Rust, but that doesn't work with the templating. The variable needs to be initialized statically, since this target doesn't support the .init section. Currently, I just used a byte array and standard C array initialization. The mapping between this C type and the Rust type needs to be manually maintained. There is a compile-time check and a unit test to make sure the Rust versions of these C definitions match the actual Rust type. If any reviewer knows of a better solution, please do tell.
### Dependency inversion issue
`std` depends on `panic_unwind` which depends on `libunwind`, and `libunwind` depends on `std`. This is not normally supported by Rust's linking system. Therefore we use raw C exports from `std` *and* `libunwind.a` is linked last in the target `post_link_objects` instead of being built as part of the Rust `libunwind`. Currently, all C exports are defined in `src/libstd/sys/sgx/rwlock.rs` to overcome LTO issues. Only the `__rust_rwlock_*` definitions *need* to live there for privacy reasons. Once again, if any reviewer knows of a better solution, please do tell.
r? @alexcrichton
On musl targets assume certain symbols exist (like pipe2 and accept4).
This fixes#56675.
I don't know if this is the best solution, or if I should also add some tests so I'm waiting for some feedback.
Thanks!
This brings in a few updates:
* Update wasm intrinsic naming for atomics
* Update and reimplement most simd128 wasm intrinsics
* Other misc improvements here and there, including a small start to
AVX-512 intrinsics
Add checked_add method to Instant time type
Appending functionality to the already opened topic of `checked_add` on time types over at #55940.
Doing checked addition between an `Instant` and a `Duration` is important to reliably determine a future instant. We could use this in the `parking_lot` crate to compute an instant when in the future to wake a thread up without risking a panic.
* Update bootstrap compiler
* Update version to 1.33.0
* Remove some `#[cfg(stage0)]` annotations
Actually updating the version number is blocked on updating Cargo
Ever since we added a Cargo-based build system for the compiler the
standard library has always been a little special, it's never been able
to depend on crates.io crates for runtime dependencies. This has been a
result of various limitations, namely that Cargo doesn't understand that
crates from crates.io depend on libcore, so Cargo tries to build crates
before libcore is finished.
I had an idea this afternoon, however, which lifts the strategy
from #52919 to directly depend on crates.io crates from the standard
library. After all is said and done this removes a whopping three
submodules that we need to manage!
The basic idea here is that for any crate `std` depends on it adds an
*optional* dependency on an empty crate on crates.io, in this case named
`rustc-std-workspace-core`. This crate is overridden via `[patch]` in
this repository to point to a local crate we write, and *that* has a
`path` dependency on libcore.
Note that all `no_std` crates also depend on `compiler_builtins`, but if
we're not using submodules we can publish `compiler_builtins` to
crates.io and all crates can depend on it anyway! The basic strategy
then looks like:
* The standard library (or some transitive dep) decides to depend on a
crate `foo`.
* The standard library adds
```toml
[dependencies]
foo = { version = "0.1", features = ['rustc-dep-of-std'] }
```
* The crate `foo` has an optional dependency on `rustc-std-workspace-core`
* The crate `foo` has an optional dependency on `compiler_builtins`
* The crate `foo` has a feature `rustc-dep-of-std` which activates these
crates and any other necessary infrastructure in the crate.
A sample commit for `dlmalloc` [turns out to be quite simple][commit].
After that all `no_std` crates should largely build "as is" and still be
publishable on crates.io! Notably they should be able to continue to use
stable Rust if necessary, since the `rename-dependency` feature of Cargo
is soon stabilizing.
As a proof of concept, this commit removes the `dlmalloc`,
`libcompiler_builtins`, and `libc` submodules from this repository. Long
thorns in our side these are now gone for good and we can directly
depend on crates.io! It's hoped that in the long term we can bring in
other crates as necessary, but for now this is largely intended to
simply make it easier to manage these crates and remove submodules.
This should be a transparent non-breaking change for all users, but one
possible stickler is that this almost for sure breaks out-of-tree
`std`-building tools like `xargo` and `cargo-xbuild`. I think it should
be relatively easy to get them working, however, as all that's needed is
an entry in the `[patch]` section used to build the standard library.
Hopefully we can work with these tools to solve this problem!
[commit]: 28ee12db81
Replace usages of `..i + 1` ranges with `..=i`.
Before this change we were using old computer code techniques. After this change we use the new and improved computer code techniques.
