Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #138283 (Enforce type of const param correctly in MIR typeck)
- #138439 (feat: check ARG_MAX on Unix platforms)
- #138502 (resolve: Avoid some unstable iteration)
- #138514 (Remove fake borrows of refs that are converted into non-refs in `MakeByMoveBody`)
- #138524 (Mark myself as unavailable for reviews temporarily)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Remove fake borrows of refs that are converted into non-refs in `MakeByMoveBody`
Remove fake borrows of closure captures if that capture has been replaced with a by-move version of that capture.
For example, given an async closure that looks like:
```
let f: Foo;
let c = async move || {
match f { ... }
};
```
... in this pair of coroutine-closure + coroutine, we capture `Foo` in the parent and `&Foo` in the child. We will emit two fake borrows like:
```
_2 = &fake shallow (*(_1.0: &Foo));
_3 = &fake shallow (_1.0: &Foo);
```
However, since the by-move-body transform is responsible for replacing `_1.0: &Foo` with `_1.0: Foo` (since the `AsyncFnOnce` coroutine will own `Foo` by value), that makes the second fake borrow obsolete since we never have an upvar of type `&Foo`, and we should replace it with a `nop`.
As a side-note, we don't actually even care about fake borrows here at all since they're fully a MIR borrowck artifact, and we don't need to borrowck by-move MIR bodies. But it's best to preserve as much as we can between these two bodies :)
Fixes#138501
r? oli-obk
feat: check ARG_MAX on Unix platforms
On Unix the limits can be gargantuan anyway so we're pretty unlikely to hit them, but might still exceed it.
We consult ARG_MAX here to get an estimate.
Fixes#138421
r? `@jieyouxu`
Enforce type of const param correctly in MIR typeck
Properly intercepts and then annotates the type for a `ConstKind::Param` in the MIR.
This code should probably be cleaned up, it's kinda spaghetti, but no better structure really occurred to me when writing this case.
We could probably gate this behind the feature gate or add a fast path when the args have no free regions if perf is bad.
r? `@BoxyUwU`
Use `rustc_type_ir` directly less in the codebase
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/138449
This is a somewhat opinionated bundle of changes that will make working on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/138449 more easy, since it cuts out the bulk of the changes that would be necessitated by the lint. Namely:
1. Fold `rustc_middle::ty::fold` and `rustc_middle::ty::visit` into `rustc_middle::ty`. This is because we already reexport some parts of these modules into `rustc_middle::ty`, and there's really no benefit from namespacing away the rest of these modules's functionality given how important folding and visiting is to the type layer.
2. Rename `{Decodable,Encodable}_Generic` to `{Decodable,Encodable}_NoContext`[^why], change it to be "perfect derive" (`synstructure::AddBounds::Fields`), use it throughout `rustc_type_ir` instead of `TyEncodable`/`TyDecodable`.
3. Make `TyEncodable` and `TyDecodable` derives use `::rustc_middle::ty::codec::TyEncoder` (etc) for its generated paths, and move the `rustc_type_ir::codec` module back to `rustc_middle::ty::codec` 🎉.
4. Stop using `rustc_type_ir` in crates that aren't "fundamental" to the type system, namely middle/infer/trait-selection. This amounted mostly to changing imports from `use rustc_type_ir::...` to `use rustc_middle::ty::...`, but also this means that we can't glob import `TyKind::*` since the reexport into `rustc_middle::ty::TyKind` is a type alias. Instead, use the prefixed variants like `ty::Str` everywhere -- IMO this is a good change, since it makes it more regularized with most of the rest of the compiler.
[^why]: `_NoContext` is the name for derive macros with no additional generic bounds and which do "perfect derive" by generating bounds based on field types. See `HashStable_NoContext`.
I'm happy to cut out some of these changes into separate PRs to make landing it a bit easier, though I don't expect to have much trouble with bitrot.
r? lcnr
Do not suggest using `-Zmacro-backtrace` for builtin macros
For macros that are implemented on the compiler, or that are annotated with `rustc_diagnostic_item`, which have arbitrary implementations from the point of view of the user and might as well be intrinsics, we do *not* mention the `-Zmacro-backtrace` flag. This includes `derive`s and standard macros like `panic!` and `format!`.
This PR adds a field to every `Span`'s `ExpnData` stating whether it comes from a builtin macro. This is determined by the macro being annotated with either `#[rustc_builtin_macro]` or `#[rustc_diagnostic_item]`. An alternative to using these attributes that already exist for other uses would be to introduce another attribute like `#[rustc_no_backtrace]` to have finer control on which macros are affected (for example, an error within `vec![]` now doesn't mention the backtrace, but one could make the case that it should). Ideally, instead of carrying this information in the `ExpnData` we'd instead try to query the `DefId` of the macro (that is already stored) to see if it is annotated in some way, but we do not have access to the `TyCtxt` from `rustc_errors`.
r? `@petrochenkov`
Make `Parser::parse_expr_cond` public
This allows usage in rustfmt and rustfmt forks.
I'm using this for custom macro formatting, see 30c83df9e1/src/parse/macros/html.rs (L57)
It would be great if this could be upstreamed so I don't need to rely on a fork.
Fix HIR printing of parameters
HIR pretty printing does the wrong thing for anonymous parameters, and there is no test coverage for it. This PR remedies both of those things.
r? ``@lcnr``
Refactor is_snake_case.
I wondered what the definition of this actually was, and found the original hard to read. I believe this change preserves the original behavior, but is hopefully clearer.
rustc_target: Add target features for LoongArch v1.1
This patch adds new target features for LoongArch v1.1:
* div32
* lam-bh
* lamcas
* ld-seq-sa
* scq
This clarifies the explanation of why this is not allowed and also what to do instead.
Fixes 62071
PS There was suggestion of adding a link to the book. I did not yet do that, but if desired that could be added.
Provide helpful diagnostics for shebang lookalikes
When `[` is not found after a `#!`, a note will be added to the exisiting error
```
error: expected `[`, found `/`
--> src/main.rs:2:3
|
2 | #!/usr/bin/env -S cargo +nightly -Zscript
| ^ expected `[`
|
= note: the token sequence `#!` here looks like the start of a shebang interpreter directive but it is not
= help: if you meant this to be a shebang interpreter directive, move it to the very start of the file
```
Fixes#137249
r? `@fmease`
On Unix the limits can be gargantuan anyway so we're pretty
unlikely to hit them, but might still exceed it.
We consult ARG_MAX here to get an estimate.
EUV: fix place of deref pattern's interior's scrutinee
The place previously used here was that of the temporary holding the reference returned by `Deref::deref` or `DerefMut::deref_mut`. However, since the inner pattern of `deref!(inner)` expects the deref-target type itself, this would ICE when that type was inspected (e.g. by the EUV case for slice patterns). This adds a deref projection to fix that.
Since current in-tree consumers of EUV (upvar inference and clippy) don't care about Rvalues, the place could be simplified to `self.cat_rvalue(pat.hir_id, self.pat_ty_adjusted(subpat)?)` to save some cycles. I personally find EUV to be a bit fragile, so I've opted for pedantic correctness. Maybe a `HACK` comment would suffice though?
Fixes#125059
r? `@compiler-errors`
Visit `PatField` when collecting lint levels
Fixes#138428
Side-note, I vaguely skimmed over the other nodes we could be visiting here and it doesn't *seem* to me that we're missing anything, though I may be mistaken given recent(?) support for attrs in where clauses(??). Can be fixed in a follow-up PR.
fix: remove the check of lld not supporting @response-file
In LLVM v9, lld has supported `@response-file.`
LLVM v9 was released on 2019-09-19.
The check was added back to 2018-03-14 (1.26.0) via 04442af18b.
It has been more than five years, and we ship our own lld regardlessly.
This should be happily removed.
See also:
* <bb12396f91>
* <https://reviews.llvm.org/D63024>
