Use select in projection lookup in `report_projection_error`
Using `for_each_relevant_impl` doesn't actually select the correct impl; we can use `select` here to actually get the correct impl with certainty. Follow-up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140278.
r? oli-obk
Rollup of 12 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #134034 (handle paren in macro expand for let-init-else expr)
- #137474 (pretty-print: Print shebang at the top of the output)
- #138872 (rustc_target: RISC-V `Zfinx` is incompatible with `{ILP32,LP64}[FD]` ABIs)
- #139046 (Improve `Lifetime::suggestion`)
- #139206 (std: use the address of `errno` to identify threads in `unique_thread_exit`)
- #139608 (Clarify `async` block behaviour)
- #139847 (Delegate to inner `vec::IntoIter` from `env::ArgsOs`)
- #140159 (Avoid redundant WTF-8 checks in `PathBuf`)
- #140197 (Document breaking out of a named code block)
- #140389 (Remove `avx512dq` and `avx512vl` implication for `avx512fp16`)
- #140430 (Improve test coverage of HIR pretty printing.)
- #140507 (rustc_target: RISC-V: feature addition batch 3)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rustc_target: RISC-V `Zfinx` is incompatible with `{ILP32,LP64}[FD]` ABIs
Because RISC-V Calling Conventions note that:
> This means code targeting the `Zfinx` extension always uses the ILP32, ILP32E or LP64 integer calling-convention only ABIs as there is no dedicated hardware floating-point register file.
`{ILP32,LP64}[FD]` ABIs with hardware floating-point calling conventions are incompatible with the `Zfinx` extension.
This commit adds `"zfinx"` to the incompatible feature list to those ABIs and tests whether trying to add `"zdinx"` (that is analogous to `"zfinx"` but in double-precision) on a LP64D ABI configuration results in an error (it also tests extension implication; `Zdinx` requires `Zfinx` extension).
Links: RISC-V psABI specification version 1.0
<https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/blob/v1.0/riscv-cc.adoc#named-abis>
<https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/releases/tag/v1.0>
handle paren in macro expand for let-init-else expr
Fixes#131655
This PR modifies the codegen logic of the macro expansion within `let-init-else` expression:
- Before: The expression `let xxx = (mac! {}) else {}` expands to `let xxx = (expanded_ast) else {}`.
- After: The same expression expands to `let xxx = expanded_ast else {}`.
An alternative solution to this issue could involve handling the source code directly when encountering unused parentheses in `let-init-else` expressions. However, this approach might be more cumbersome due to the absence of the necessary data structure.
r? `@petrochenkov`
By taking the existing `expanded-exhaustive.rs` test and running it with
both `Zunpretty=expanded` *and* `Zunpretty=hir`.
Also rename some files, and split the asm parts out so they only run on
x86-64.
allow `#[rustc_std_internal_symbol]` in combination with `#[naked]`
The need for this came up in https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-builtins/pull/897, but in general this seems useful and valid to allow.
Based on a quick scan, I don't think changes to the generated assembly are needed.
cc ``@bjorn3``
Clean up "const" situation in format_args!().
This cleans up the "const" situation in the format_args!() expansion/lowering.
Rather than marking the Argument::new_display etc. functions as non-const, this marks the Arguments::new_v1 functions as non-const.
Example expansion/lowering of format_args!() in const:
```rust
// Error: cannot call non-const formatting macro in constant functions
const {
fmt::Arguments::new_v1( // Now the error is produced here.
&["Hello, ", "!\n"],
&[
fmt::Argument::new_display(&world) // The error used to be produced here.
],
)
}
```
rustdoc: Fix doctest heuristic for main fn wrapping
Fixes#140412 which regressed in #140220 that I reviewed. As mentioned in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140220#issuecomment-2837061779, at the time I didn't have the time to re-review its latest changes and should've therefore invalided my previous "r=me" and blocked the PR on another review given the fragile nature of the doctest impl. This didn't happen which is my fault.
Contains some other small changes. Diff best reviewed modulo whitespace.
r? ``@GuillaumeGomez``
Because RISC-V Calling Conventions note that:
> This means code targeting the Zfinx extension always uses the ILP32,
> ILP32E or LP64 integer calling-convention only ABIs as there is no
> dedicated hardware floating-point register file.
{ILP32,LP64}[FD] ABIs with hardware floating-point calling conventions
are incompatible with the "Zfinx" extension.
This commit adds "zfinx" to the incompatible feature list to those ABIs
and tests whether trying to add "zdinx" (that is analogous to "zfinx" but
in double-precision) on a LP64D ABI configuration results in an error
(it also tests extension implication; "Zdinx" requires "Zfinx" extension).
Link: RISC-V psABI specification version 1.0
<https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/releases/tag/v1.0>
This commit adds three ratified unprivileged RISC-V extensions related to
BFloat16 (BF16) handling.
Although that they are far from stabilization due to ABI issues, they are
optional extensions of the RVA23U64 profile (application-class processor
profile) and going to be discoverable from the Linux kernel
(as of version 6.15-rc4).
This commit mainly prepares runtime detection of those extensions.
This commit adds a part of RISC-V extensions that are mandatory part of
the RVA23U64 profile (application-class processor profile) and related to
memory/atomic constraints.
The Zic64b extension constrains the cache line to naturally-aligned 64 bytes
that would make certain memory operations (like zeroing the memory using
the Zicboz extension) easier.
The Zicbom and Zicbop extensions enable managing cache block-based
operations (the Zicbop contains hints that will work as a NOP when this
extension is absent and the Zicbom contains control instructions).
Of which, the Zicbom extension is going to be discoverable from the Linux
kernel (as of the version 6.15-rc4) and this commit prepares for
corresponding stdarch changes.
The Zicc* extensions add certain constraints to "the main memory" (usually
true on the user mode application on the application-class processor but
those extensions make sure such constraints exist).
Require sanitizers be enabled for asan_odr_windows.rs
Issue Details:
The `asan_odr_windows.rs` test is failing on AArch64 Windows, as sanitizers aren't supported on that platform.
Fix Details:
Apply the correct "need sanitizer" requirements to the test.
chore: delete unused ui/auxiliary crates
It appears that all the tests that used it have been moved to tests/ui/editions/ (or elsewhere) already.
r? `````@jieyouxu`````
Don't FCW assoc consts in patterns
Fixes#140447
See comment in added test. We could also check that the anon const is a const arg by looking at the HIR. I'm not sure that's necessary though 🤔 The only consts that are evaluated "for the type system" are const args (which *should* get FCWs) and const patterns (which cant be anon consts afaik).
chore: edit and move tests
I deleted `ui/non-copyable-void.rs`: added in ab4105d9e8 to test that "nonconstructable" enums are "noncopyable", but these properties are not correlated anymore.
Second commit is kinda messy because I moved/edited/renamed some files at the same time, but I deleted nothing there.
transmutability: ensure_sufficient_stack when answering query
Based on #140380.
Fixes#118860. The compile time was addressed earlier, this merely addresses stack overflow part of the issue.
r? `@jswrenn` `@joshlf`
