Rework dyn trait lowering to stop being so intertwined with trait alias expansion
This PR reworks the trait object lowering code to stop handling trait aliases so funky, and removes the `TraitAliasExpander` in favor of a much simpler design. This refactoring is important for making the code that I'm writing in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133397 understandable and easy to maintain, so the diagnostics regressions are IMO inevitable.
In the old trait object lowering code, we used to be a bit sloppy with the lists of traits in their unexpanded and expanded forms. This PR largely rewrites this logic to expand the trait aliases *once* and handle them more responsibly throughout afterwards.
Please review this with whitespace disabled.
r? lcnr
I think the diagnostic could use some work, but it's more helpful than
the alternative. The previous error was misleading, since it ignored the
inherited reference altogether.
The debug assertion ensuring that the pattern mutability cap holds
assumes the presence of Rule 3, so it now checks for that. I
considered going back to only tracking the mutability cap when Rule 3
is present, but since the mutability cap is used in Rule 5's
implementation too, the debug assertion would still need to check
which typing rules are present.
This also required some changes to tests:
- `ref_pat_eat_one_layer_2021.rs` had a test for Rule 3; I'll be
handling tests for earlier editions in a later commit, so as a stopgap
I've #[cfg]ed it out.
- One test case had to be moved from `well-typed-edition-2024.rs` to
`borrowck-errors.rs` in order to get borrowck to run on it and emit an
error.
These targets have always generated DWARF debuginfo and not CodeView/PDB debuginfo
like the MSVC Windows targets. Correct their target definitions to reflect this.
The newly added tests for the various combinations of `*-windows-gnu*` targets and
`-Csplit-debuginfo` show that this does not change any stable behavior.
Subtree sync for rustc_codegen_cranelift
Nothing too exciting this time, but this includes a fix for a linker hang on Windows: https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc_codegen_cranelift/pull/1554
r? ``@ghost``
``@rustbot`` label +A-codegen +A-cranelift +T-compiler
Partial progress on #132735: Replace extern "rust-intrinsic" with #[rustc_intrinsic] across the codebase
Part of #132735: Replace `extern "rust-intrinsic"` with `#[rustc_intrinsic]` macro
- Updated all instances of `extern "rust-intrinsic"` to use the `#[rustc_intrinsic]` macro.
- Skipped `.md` files and test files to avoid unnecessary changes.
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #135433 (Add Profile Override for Non-Git Sources)
- #135626 (doc: Point to methods on `Command` as alternatives to `set/remove_var`)
- #135658 (Do not include GCC source code in source tarballs)
- #135676 (rustc_resolve: use structured fields in traces)
- #135762 (Correct counting to four in cell module docs)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
When LLVM's location discriminator value limit is exceeded, emit locations with dummy spans instead of dropping them entirely
Dropping them fails `-Zverify-llvm-ir`.
Fixes#135332.
r? `@jieyouxu`
rustc_resolve: use structured fields in traces
I think this crate was written before `tracing` was adopted, and was manually writing fields into trace logs instead of using structured fields.
I kept function names in the trace messages even though I added `#[instrument]` invocations so that the events will be in named spans, wasn't sure if spans are always printed.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #135542 (Add the concrete syntax for precise capturing to 1.82 release notes.)
- #135700 (Emit single privacy error for struct literal with multiple private fields and add test for `default_field_values` privacy)
- #135722 (make it possible to use ci-rustc on tarball sources)
- #135729 (Add debug assertions to compiler profile)
- #135736 (rustdoc: Fix flaky doctest test)
- #135738 (Replace usages of `map_or(bool, ...)` with `is_{some_and|none_or|ok_and}`)
- #135747 (Rename FileName::QuoteExpansion to CfgSpec)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Always force non-trimming of path in `unreachable_patterns` lint
Creating a "trimmed DefID path" when no error is being emitted is an ICE (on purpose). If we create a trimmed path for a lint that is then silenced before being emitted causes a known ICE. This side-steps the issue by always using `with_no_trimmed_path!`.
This was verified to fix https://github.com/quinn-rs/quinn/, but couldn't write a repro case for the test suite.
Fix#135289.
Match Ergonomics 2024: document and reorganize the currently-implemented feature gates
The hope here is to make it easier to adjust, understand, and test the experimental pattern typing rules implemented in the compiler. This PR doesn't (or at isn't intended to) change any behavior or add any new tests; I'll be handling that later. I've also included some reasoning/commentary on the more involved changes in the commit messages.
Relevant tracking issue: #123076
r? `@Nadrieril`
fully de-stabilize all custom inner attributes
`#![test]` and `#![rustfmt::skip]` were accidentally accepted in more places than they should. These have been marked as soft-unstable since forever (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/82399) and shown in future-compat reports since Rust 1.77 (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116274).
Cc `@rust-lang/lang` `@petrochenkov`
Rename FileName::QuoteExpansion to CfgSpec
I believe this variant name was used incorrectly. The timeline is roughly:
* `FileName::cfg_spec_source_code` was added in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/54517. However, it used `FileName::Quote` instead of `FileName::CfgSpec` which I believe was a mistake.
* Quote stuff was removed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/51285, but did not remove `FileName::Quote`.
* `FileName::CfgSpec` was removed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116474 because it was unused.
This restores it so that the `--cfg` variant uses a name that makes more sense with how it is used, and restores what I think is the original intent.
Replace usages of `map_or(bool, ...)` with `is_{some_and|none_or|ok_and}`
Split out from #135732 according to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/135732?pullrequestreview-2561072330 ,
same thing but just for the compiler:
> The usage of `map_or(bool, ...)` is really hard to understand IMHO.
> This PR simply uses clippy (with `--fix`) to replace that with `is_{some_and|none_or|ok_and}`.
> (no manual modifications were made, just machine applicable clippy fixes and then fmt)
r? ``@compiler-errors``
Emit single privacy error for struct literal with multiple private fields and add test for `default_field_values` privacy
Add test ensuring that struct with default field values is not constructable if the fields are not accessible.
Collect all unreachable fields in a single struct literal struct and emit a single error, instead of one error per private field.
```
error[E0451]: fields `beta` and `gamma` of struct `Alpha` are private
--> $DIR/visibility.rs:18:13
|
LL | let _x = Alpha {
| ----- in this type
LL | beta: 0,
| ^^^^^^^ private field
LL | ..
| ^^ field `gamma` is private
```
This adds explanation of inherited references and how they relate to the default binding mode.
Co-authored-by: Nadrieril <Nadrieril@users.noreply.github.com>
I believe this variant name was used incorrectly. The timeline is roughly:
* `FileName::cfg_spec_source_code` was added in
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/54517. However, it used
`FileName::Quote` instead of `FileName::CfgSpec` which I believe was a
mistake.
* Quote stuff was removed in
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/51285, but did not remove
`FileName::Quote`.
* `FileName::CfgSpec` was removed in
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116474 because it was unused.
This restores it so that the `--cfg` variant uses a name that makes more
sense with how it is used, and restores what I think is the original
intent.
