Do not eagerly fold consts in `normalize_param_env_or_error` if new solver
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/213
Given:
```
trait Trait: Deref<Target = [u8; { 1 + 1 }]> {}
```
when elaborating param env for `Trait`, we have `Self: Trait`, `Self: Deref<Target = [u8; {anon const}]>`.
Before this PR, we would fold the anon consts away *before* elaborating. However, we end up getting another *un-folded* copy of the anon const from elaborating `Self: Trait`. This leads to normalization ambiguity.
r? lcnr
only resolve top-level guard patterns' guards once
We resolve guard patterns' guards in `resolve_pattern_inner`, so to avoid resolving them multiple times, we must avoid doing so earlier. To accomplish this, `LateResolutionVisitor::visit_pat` contains a case for guard patterns that avoids visiting their guards while walking patterns.
This PR fixes#141265, which was due to `visit::walk_pat` being used instead; this meant guards at the top level of a pattern would be visited twice. e.g. it would ICE on `for x if x in [] {}`, but not `for (x if x) in [] {}`. `visit_pat` was already used for the guard pattern in the second example, on account of the top-level pattern being parens.
Match on lang item kind instead of using an if/else chain
Similar to how the new solver does this. Just noticed while I was adding a new entry to the chain 😆
typeck: catch `continue`s pointing to blocks
This taints the typeck results with errors if a `continue` is found not pointing to a loop.
A few things were going wrong here. First, since this wasn't caught in typeck, we'd end up building the THIR and then running liveness lints on ill-formed HIR. Since liveness assumes all `continue`s point to loops, it wasn't setting a live node for the `continue`'s destination. There was a fallback for if it couldn't retrieve that live node, but it was faulty; it would create a new live node to represent an erroneous state after the analysis's RWU table had already been built. This would ICE if the new live node was used in operations, such as merging results from the arms of a match. I've removed this error-recovery since it was buggy, and we should really catch bad labels before liveness.
I've also replaced an outdated comment about when liveness lints are run. At this point, I think the call to `check_liveness` could be moved elsewhere, but if it can be run when the typeck results are tainted by errors, it'll need some slight refactoring so it can bail out in that case. In lieu of that, I've added an assert.
Fixes#113379Fixes#121623
Allow trailing comma after argument in query definition
Don't catastrophically fail the query macro if you put a comma after your query key!
r? oli-obk
Suggest use "{}", self.x instead of {self.x} when resolve x as field of `self`
Fixes#141136
Changes can be seen in the second commit: 9de7fff0d8
r? compiler
collect doc alias as tips during resolution
Close#124273
Collect the symbol in the doc alias attributes and provide a tip when a match is found.
r? `@estebank`
This taints the typeck results with errors if a `continue` is found not
pointing to a loop, which fixes an ICE.
A few things were going wrong here. First, since this wasn't caught in
typeck, we'd end up building the THIR and then running liveness lints on
ill-formed HIR. Since liveness assumes all `continue`s point to loops,
it wasn't setting a live node for the `continue`'s destination. However,
the fallback for this was faulty; it would create a new live node to
represent the erroneous state after the analysis's RWU table had already
been built. This would ICE if the new live node was used in operations,
such as merging results from the arms of a match. I've removed this
error-recovery since it was buggy, and we should really catch bad labels
before liveness.
I've also replaced an outdated comment about when liveness lints are
run. At this point, I think the call to `check_liveness` could be moved
elsewhere, but if it can be run when the typeck results are tainted by
errors, it'll need some slight refactoring so it can bail out in that
case. In lieu of that, I've added an assertion.
Add TRACING_ENABLED to Machine and add enter_trace_span!()
This PR adds the necessary infrastructure to make it possible to do tracing calls from within `rustc_const_eval` when running Miri, while making sure they don't impact the performance of normal compiler execution. This is done by adding a `const` boolean to `Machine`, false by default, but that will be set to true in Miri only. The tracing macro `enter_trace_span!()` checks if it is true before doing anything, and since the value of a `const` is known at compile time, if it it false it the whole tracing call should be optimized out.
I will soon open further PRs to add tracing macro calls similar to this one, so that afterwards it will be possible to learn more about Miri's time spent in the various interpretation steps:
```rs
let _guard = enter_trace_span!(M, "eval_statement", "{:?}", stmt);
```
r? `@RalfJung`
`gather_locals`: only visit guard pattern guards when checking the guard
When checking a pattern with guards in it, `GatherLocalsVisitor` will visit both the pattern (when type-checking the let, arm, or param containing it) and local declarations in the guard expression (when checking the guard itself). This keeps it from visiting the guard when visiting the pattern, since otherwise it would gather locals from the guard twice, which would lead to a delayed bug: "evaluated expression more than once".
Tracking issue for guard patterns: #129967
Warning added when dependency crate has async drop types, and the feature is disabled
In continue of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/141031.
When dependency crate has non-empty `adt_async_destructor` table in metadata, and `async_drop` feature is disabled for local crate, warning will be emitted.
Test `dependency-dropped` has two revisions - with and without feature enabled. With feature enabled, async drop for dropee is executed ("Async drop" printed). Without the feature enabled, sync drop is executed ("Sync drop" printed) and warning is emitted.
Warning example:
```
warning: found async drop types in dependecy `async_drop_dep`, but async_drop feature is disabled for `dependency_dropped`
--> $DIR/dependency-dropped.rs:7:1
|
LL | #![cfg_attr(with_feature, feature(async_drop))]
| ^
|
= help: if async drop type will be dropped in a crate without `feature(async_drop)`, sync Drop will be used
```
Resolved issue with mismatched types triggering ICE in certain scenarios
## Background
The function `annotate_mut_binding_to_immutable_binding` called in `emit_coerce_suggestions` performs a type comparison between the `expected` and `found` types from `ExpectedFound` in the `TypeError`. This can fail if the `found` type contains a region variable that's been rolled back.
## What is being changed?
This updates `annotate_mut_binding_to_immutable_binding` to use `expr_ty` and `expected` from the parent function instead of the types from the `TypeError`. This sidesteps the issue of using `found` from `TypeError` which may leak lingering inference region variables.
This does change the diagnostic behavior to _only_ support cases where the expected outermost type is `&T`, but that seems to be the intended functionality.
Also fixed the example in the `annotate_mut_binding_to_immutable_binding` rustdocs.
r? rust-lang/types
Fixes#140823
When checking a pattern with guards in it, `GatherLocalsVisitor` will
visit both the pattern (when type-checking the let, arm, or param
containing it) and the guard expression (when checking the guard
itself). This keeps it from visiting the guard when visiting the
pattern, since otherwise it would gather locals from the guard twice,
which would lead to a delayed bug: "evaluated expression more than
once".
We resolve guard patterns' guards in `resolve_pattern_inner`, so to
avoid resolving them multiple times, we must avoid doing so earlier. To
accomplish this, `LateResolutionVisitor::visit_pat` contains a case for
guard patterns that avoids visiting their guards while walking patterns.
This fixes an ICE due to `visit::walk_pat` being used instead, which
meant guards at the top level of a pattern would be visited twice.
