Fix ICE-133117: multiple never-pattern arm doesn't have false_edge_start_block
Fixes#133117 , and close fixes#133063 , fixes#130779
In order to fix ICE-133117, at first I needed to tackle to ICE-133063 (this fixed 130779 as well).
### ICE-133063 and ICE-130779
This ICE is caused by those steps:
1. An arm has or-pattern, and all of the sub-candidates are never-pattern
2. In that case, all sub-candidates are removed in remove_never_subcandidates(). So the arm (candidate) has no sub-candidate.
3. In the current implementation, if there is no sub-candidate, the function assigns `pre_binding_block` into the candidate ([here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/builder/matches/mod.rs#L2002-L2004)). However, otherwise_block should be assigned to the candidate as well, because the otherwise_block is unwrapped in multiple place (like in lower_match_tree()). As a result, it causes the panic.
I simply added the same block as pre_binding_block into otherwise_block, but I'm wondering if there is a better block to assign to otherwise_block (is it ok to assign the same block into pre_binding and otherwise?)
### ICE-133117
This is caused by those steps:
1. There are two arms, both are or-pattern and each has one match-pair (in the test code, both are `(!|!)`), and the second arm has a guard.
2. In match_candidate() for the first arm, it expands the second arm’s sub-candidates as well ([here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/builder/matches/mod.rs#L1800-L1805)). As a result, the root candidate of the second arm is not evaluated/modified in match_candidate(). So a false_edge_start_block is not assigned to the candidate.
3. merge_trivial_subcandidates() is called against the candidate for the second arm. It just returns immediately because the candidate has a guard. So a flase_edge_start_block is not assigned to the candidate also in this function.
4. remove_never_subcandidates() is called against the candidate. Since all sub-candidates are never-pattern. they are removed.
5. In lower_match_tree(), since there is no sub-candidate for the candidate, the candidate itself is evaluated in visit_leave_rev ([here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/builder/matches/mod.rs#L1532)). Because the candidate has no false_edge_start_block, it causes the panic.
So I modified the order of if blocks in merge_trivial_subcandidates() to assign a false_edge_start_block if the candidate doesn't have.
The candidate shouldn't have false_edge_start_block if it has sub candidates.
In remove_never_subcandidates(), the false_edge_start_block from the first sub candidte is assigned to a value and the value is later used if all sub candidates are removed and candidate doesn't have false_edge_start_block.
In merge_trivial_subcandidates, I leave the if block which assign a false_edge_start_block into the candidate as before I put this commit since compile panics.
Signed-off-by: Shunpoco <tkngsnsk313320@gmail.com>
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #135542 (Add the concrete syntax for precise capturing to 1.82 release notes.)
- #135700 (Emit single privacy error for struct literal with multiple private fields and add test for `default_field_values` privacy)
- #135722 (make it possible to use ci-rustc on tarball sources)
- #135729 (Add debug assertions to compiler profile)
- #135736 (rustdoc: Fix flaky doctest test)
- #135738 (Replace usages of `map_or(bool, ...)` with `is_{some_and|none_or|ok_and}`)
- #135747 (Rename FileName::QuoteExpansion to CfgSpec)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Always force non-trimming of path in `unreachable_patterns` lint
Creating a "trimmed DefID path" when no error is being emitted is an ICE (on purpose). If we create a trimmed path for a lint that is then silenced before being emitted causes a known ICE. This side-steps the issue by always using `with_no_trimmed_path!`.
This was verified to fix https://github.com/quinn-rs/quinn/, but couldn't write a repro case for the test suite.
Fix#135289.
If all subcandidates have never-pattern, we should assign false_edge_start_block to the parent candidate
if it doesn't have. merge_trivial_subcandidates does so, but if the candidate has guard it returns before the assignment.
Signed-off-by: Shunpoco <tkngsnsk313320@gmail.com>
If all subcandidates have never-pattern, the parent candidate should have otherwise_block
because some methods expect the candidate has the block.
Signed-off-by: Shunpoco <tkngsnsk313320@gmail.com>
When we encounter a constant in a pattern, we check if it is non-structural. If so, we check if the type implements `PartialEq`, but for types with escaping bound vars the check would be incorrect as is, so we break early. This is ok because these types would be filtered anyways.
Fix#134764.
Creating a "trimmed DefID path" when no error is being emitted is an ICE (on purpose). If we create a trimmed path for a lint that is then silenced before being emitted causes a known ICE. This side-steps the issue by always using `with_no_trimmed_path!`.
This was verified to fix https://github.com/quinn-rs/quinn/, but couldn't write a repro case for the test suite.
Fix#135289.
turn rustc_box into an intrinsic
I am not entirely sure why this was made a special magic attribute, but an intrinsic seems like a more natural way to add magic expressions to the language.
rustc_intrinsic: support functions without body
We synthesize a HIR body `loop {}` but such bodyless intrinsics.
Most of the diff is due to turning `ItemKind::Fn` into a brace (named-field) enum variant, because it carries a `bool`-typed field now. This is to remember whether the function has a body. MIR building panics to avoid ever translating the fake `loop {}` body, and the intrinsic logic uses the lack of a body to implicitly mark that intrinsic as must-be-overridden.
I first tried actually having no body rather than generating the fake body, but there's a *lot* of code that assumes that all function items have HIR and MIR, so this didn't work very well. Then I noticed that even `rustc_intrinsic_must_be_overridden` intrinsics have MIR generated (they are filled with an `Unreachable` terminator) so I guess I am not the first to discover this. ;)
r? `@oli-obk`
Make sure we handle `backwards_incompatible_lint` drops appropriately in drop elaboration
In #131326, a new kind of scheduled drop (`drop_kind: DropKind::Value` + `backwards_incompatible_lint: true`) was added so that we could insert a new kind of no-op MIR statement (`backward incompatible drop`) for linting purposes.
These drops were intended to have *no side-effects*, but drop elaboration code forgot to handle these drops specially and they were handled otherwise as normal drops in most of the code. This ends up being **unsound** since we insert more than one drop call for some values, which means that `Drop::drop` could be called more than once.
This PR fixes this by splitting out the `DropKind::ForLint` and adjusting the code. I'm not totally certain if all of the places I've adjusted are either reachable or correct, but I'm pretty certain that it's *more* correct than it was previously.
cc `@dingxiangfei2009`
r? nikomatsakis
Fixes#134482
Do not do if ! else, use unnegated cond and swap the branches instead
I'm tidying up my ergonomic ref counting PR and I'm going to make some small, simple and unrelated changes outside that PR, so the main PR sticks more straight to the point.
Clarify the match ergonomics 2024 migration lint's output
This makes a few changes:
- Rather than using the whole pattern as a span for the lint, this collects spans for each problematic default binding mode reset and labels them with why they're problems.
- The lint's suggestions are now verbose-styled, so that it's clear what's being suggested vs. what's problematic.
- The wording is now less technical, and the hard error version of this diagnostic now links to the same reference material as the lint (currently an unwritten page of the edition guide).
I'm not totally confident in the wording or formatting, so I'd appreciate feedback on that in particular. I tried to draw a connection with word choice between the labels and the suggestion, but it might be imprecise, unclear, or cluttered. If so, it might be worth making the labels more terse and adding notes that explain them, but that's harder to read in a way too.
cc ```@Nadrieril``` ```@Jules-Bertholet```
Closes#133854. For reference, the error from that issue becomes:
```
error: pattern uses features incompatible with edition 2024
--> $DIR/remove-me.rs:6:25
|
LL | map.iter().filter(|(&(_x, _y), &_c)| false);
| ^ ^ cannot implicitly match against multiple layers of reference
| |
| cannot implicitly match against multiple layers of reference
|
help: make the implied reference pattern explicit
|
LL | map.iter().filter(|&(&(_x, _y), &_c)| false);
| +
```
