There are several `mk_foo`/`intern_foo` pairs, where the former takes an
iterator and the latter takes a slice. (This naming convention is bad,
but that's a fix for another PR.)
This commit changes several `mk_foo` occurrences into `intern_foo`,
avoiding the need for some `.iter()`/`.into_iter()` calls. Affected
cases:
- mk_type_list
- mk_tup
- mk_substs
- mk_const_list
Don't ICE in `might_permit_raw_init` if reference is polymorphic
Emitting optimized MIR for a polymorphic function may require computing layout of a type that isn't (yet) known. This happens in the instcombine pass, for example. Let's fail gracefully in that condition.
cc `@saethlin`
fixes#107999
Use `target` instead of `machine` for mir interpreter integer handling.
The naming of `machine` only makes sense from a mir interpreter internals perspective, but outside users talk about the `target` platform. As per https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/108029#issuecomment-1429791015
r? `@RalfJung`
Avoid accessing HIR when it can be avoided
Experiment to see if it helps some incremental cases.
Will be rebased once https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/107942 gets merged.
r? `@ghost`
interpret: rename Pointer::from_addr → from_addr_invalid
This function corresponds to `ptr::invalid` in the standard library; the previous name was not clear enough IMO.
Extend support for `implies_by` (from `#[stable]` and `#[unstable]`)
to `#[rustc_const_stable]` and `#[rustc_const_unstable]`.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
Rename `PointerSized` to `PointerLike`
The old name was unnecessarily vague. This PR renames a nightly language feature that I added, so I don't think it needs any additional approval, though anyone can feel free to speak up if you dislike the rename.
It's still unsatisfying that we don't the user which of {size, alignment} is wrong, but this trait really is just a stepping stone for a more generalized mechanism to create `dyn*`, just meant for nightly testing, so I don't think it really deserves additional diagnostic machinery for now.
Fixes#107696, cc ``@RalfJung``
r? ``@eholk``
Modify existing bounds if they exist
Fixes#107335.
This implementation is kinda gross but I don't really see a better way to do it.
This primarily does two things: Modifies `suggest_constraining_type_param` to accept a new parameter that indicates a span to be replaced instead of added, if presented, and limit the additive suggestions to either suggest a new bound on an existing bound (see newly added unit test) or add the generics argument if a generics argument wasn't found.
The former change is required to retain the capability to add an entirely new bounds if it was entirely omitted.
r? ``@compiler-errors``
